Comparative efficacy of aflibercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with retinal pigment epithelial detachment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Humans
Ranibizumab
/ therapeutic use
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Retinal Detachment
/ drug therapy
Network Meta-Analysis
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Retrospective Studies
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ therapeutic use
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ therapeutic use
Intravitreal Injections
Macular Degeneration
/ drug therapy
Aflibercept
Age-related macular degeneration
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor
Meta-analysis
Pigment epithelial detachment
Ranibizumab
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Nov 2023
21 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
10
07
2023
accepted:
09
11
2023
medline:
23
11
2023
pubmed:
22
11
2023
entrez:
22
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED). Systematic review identifying studies comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) published before Mar 2022. One randomized controlled trial and 6 observational studies were selected for meta-analysis (1,069 patients). The change of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in IVA 2.0 mg group was better than IVR 0.5 mg (average difference 0.07) and IVR 2.0 mg (average difference 0.10), the differences were statistically significant. The change of the height of PED in IVA 2.0 group was better than IVR 0.5 group (average difference 45.30), the difference was statistically significant. The proportion of patients without PED at last visit in IVA 2.0 group were better than those in IVR 2.0 group (hazard ratio 1.91), the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference compared with IVR 0.5 group (hazard ratio 1.45). IVA required fewer injections than IVR, with a mean difference of -1.58. IVA appears to be superior to IVR in improvement of BCVA, height decrease of PED and regression of PED with less injections in nAMD with PED.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37990182
doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03214-7
pii: 10.1186/s12886-023-03214-7
pmc: PMC10664577
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
aflibercept
15C2VL427D
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
473Subventions
Organisme : National Key R&D Program of China
ID : 2020YFC2008200
Organisme : National Key R&D Program of China
ID : 2020YFC2008200
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 04;3:CD005139
pubmed: 30834517
Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2213-24
pubmed: 27566855
Retina. 1984 Fall-Winter;4(4):205-20
pubmed: 6085179
Retina. 2018 Oct;38(10):1954-1961
pubmed: 28820848
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;41(4):1363-1372
pubmed: 33481151
Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(4):739-756
pubmed: 32809132
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;13(2):158-169
pubmed: 29719645
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48
pubmed: 23084240
Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Sep;109(9):1242-57
pubmed: 1718252
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;258(7):1411-1417
pubmed: 32306096
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1144-67
pubmed: 25136079
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):68
pubmed: 36593323
J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Dec;120(12):2061-2071
pubmed: 34274193
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 19;364(20):1897-908
pubmed: 21526923
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;144(4):592-9
pubmed: 17698019
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jun;121(6):1237-45
pubmed: 24684838
Eye (Lond). 2015 Jan;29(1):80-7
pubmed: 25277305
Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Nov;102(11):1640-2
pubmed: 6208888
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):822-32
pubmed: 25578255
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 3;23(1):83
pubmed: 36869310
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):P1-P65
pubmed: 31757502
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):566-83
pubmed: 17386270
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;101(7):970-975
pubmed: 27913442
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;172:13-27
pubmed: 27637783
Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;55:282-94
pubmed: 26501481
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;37(5):1205-1214
pubmed: 27826933
Surv Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan - Feb;66(1):68-97
pubmed: 32428539
Eye (Lond). 2015 Jun;29(6):721-31
pubmed: 25882328
Semin Ophthalmol. 2011 May;26(3):198-208
pubmed: 21609233
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;39(2):431-440
pubmed: 29404860
Retina. 2023 Oct 9;:
pubmed: 37824807
Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 May-Jun;48(3):257-93
pubmed: 12745003