Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2023
accepted:
17
10
2023
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
22
11
2023
entrez:
22
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On June 23rd 2016 the UK voted to leave the European Union. The period leading up to the referendum was characterized by a significant volume of misinformation and disinformation. Existing literature has established the importance of cognitive ability in processing and discounting (mis/dis) information in decision making. We use a dataset of couples within households from a nationally representative UK survey to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability and the propensity to vote Leave / Remain in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership. We find that a one standard deviation increase in cognitive ability, all else being equal, increases the likelihood of a Remain vote by 9.7%. Similarly, we find that an increase in partner's cognitive ability further increases the respondent's likelihood of a Remain vote (7.6%). In a final test, restricting our analysis to couples who voted in a conflicting manner, we find that having a cognitive ability advantage over one's partner increases the likelihood of voting Remain (10.9%). An important question then becomes how to improve individual and household decision making in the face of increasing amounts of (mis/dis) information.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37992005
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289312
pii: PONE-D-23-06300
pmc: PMC10664886
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0289312Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Dawson, Baker. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Common Mark Stud. 2022 Sep;60(5):1449-1469
pubmed: 36248058
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1077354
pubmed: 37034948
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50
pubmed: 29935897
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Apr;111:229-245
pubmed: 31968216
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):301
pubmed: 36065426
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):E4532-E4540
pubmed: 29674447
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1121-34
pubmed: 10626367
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(1):42-71
pubmed: 24580119
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;19(1):1-6
pubmed: 18181782
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096
pubmed: 29590025
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780
pubmed: 32603243
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):938-956
pubmed: 17484614
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200424
pubmed: 33611995
Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;30(10):1449-1459
pubmed: 31432746
Intelligence. 2016 Nov-Dec;59:39-50
pubmed: 27932853
Brain Behav Immun. 2021 Aug;96:100-105
pubmed: 34022372
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604
pubmed: 33971789
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200
pubmed: 30929263