A comparison of maceration methods for the preparation of infant skeletal remains for forensic anthropological analysis.

Bones Detergent Forensic anthropology Juvenile Maceration Skeleton

Journal

International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 19 10 2023
accepted: 15 11 2023
medline: 23 11 2023
pubmed: 23 11 2023
entrez: 22 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Very little literature currently exists prescribing which maceration method to use when preparing infant human remains, resulting in bone quality that is suitable for forensic anthropological analysis. The aim of the study was to test five maceration methods to determine which is most suitable for infant remains for forensic anthropological analysis. The sample included five neonate pig carcasses (Sus scrofa domesticus), ranging between one to three days old. Five maceration methods were tested on the pig carcasses (one pig per maceration method) to determine their effectiveness. The methods included invertebrate maceration by meal worms, chemical maceration by bleach, chemical maceration by borax solution, enzymatic maceration by laundry detergent and sodium carbonate solution, and chemical maceration by sodium hypochlorite. A scoring method was created to assess the effectiveness of each maceration method. Invertebrate maceration and chemical maceration using bleach were the least successful methods of maceration (total maceration score = 8 respectively). Chemical maceration using borax and chemical maceration using sodium hypochlorite achieved complete maceration of the skeletal remains; however, they both resulted in artifacts that are unsuitable for forensic analysis (total maceration score = 14 respectively). Enzymatic maceration using laundry detergent and sodium carbonate was the most successful method (total maceration score = 17). The detergent technique subsequently successfully macerated all five sets of infant human remains. This study has validated that the enzymatic maceration technique using laundry detergent and sodium carbonate can be used to effectively macerate the remains of infant skeletal remains for forensic anthropological analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37993753
doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03137-4
pii: 10.1007/s00414-023-03137-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Research Foundation
ID : 83492

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Mairs S, Swift B, Rutty GN (2004) Detergent: an alternative approach to traditional bone cleaning methods for forensic practice. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 25:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.paf.0000147320.70639.41
doi: 10.1097/01.paf.0000147320.70639.41 pubmed: 15577515
Hefti E, Trechsel U, Rüfenacht H, Fleisch H (1980) Use of dermestid beetles for cleaning bones. Calcif Tissue Int 31:45–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407166
doi: 10.1007/BF02407166 pubmed: 6770972
King C, Birch W (2015) Assessment of maceration techniques used to remove soft tissue from bone in cut mark analysis. J Forensic Sci 60:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12582
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12582 pubmed: 25585666
Mann RW, Berryman HE (2012) A method for defleshing human remains using household bleach. J Forensic Sci 57:440–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01987.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01987.x pubmed: 22150429
Simonsen KP, Rasmussen AR, Mathisen P, Petersen H, Borup F (2011) A fast preparation of skeletal materials using enzyme maceration. J Forensic Sci 56:480–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01668.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01668.x pubmed: 21342190
Steadman DW, DiAntonio LL, Wilson JJ, Sheridan KE, Tammariello SP (2006) The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recovery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone*. J Forensic Sci 51:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00001.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00001.x pubmed: 16423217
Triaca A, Mahon T, Myburgh J (2022) A comparison of different maceration techniques on burnt remains. J Forensic Sci 67:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14939
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14939 pubmed: 34747030
Brough AL, Rutty GN, Black S, Morgan B (2012) Post-mortem computed tomography and 3D imaging: anthropological applications for juvenile remains. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8:270–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-012-9344-z
doi: 10.1007/s12024-012-9344-z pubmed: 22581318
Schaefer M, Scheuer L, Black SM (2009) Juvenile osteology: a laboratory and field manual. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, Burlington, MA
Love JC, Sanchez LA (2009) Recognition of skeletal fractures in infants: an autopsy technique. J Forensic Sci 54:1443–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01148.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01148.x pubmed: 19732272
Pearce A, Richards R, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce S (2007) Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 13:1–10. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v013a01
doi: 10.22203/eCM.v013a01 pubmed: 17334975
Allen E, Neill W (1950) Cleaning mammal skeletons with meal worms. J Mammal 31:464–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/31.4.464a
doi: 10.1093/jmammal/31.4.464a
Snyder RG, Burdi A, Gaul G (1975) A rapid technique for preparation of human fetal and adult skeletal material. J Forensic Sci 20:10306J. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS10306J
doi: 10.1520/JFS10306J
Mooney MP, Kraus EM, Bardach J, Snodgass JI (1982) Skull preparation using the enzyme-active detergent technique. Anat Rec 202:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092020115
doi: 10.1002/ar.1092020115 pubmed: 7059016
Fenton TW, Birkby WH, Cornelison J (2003) A fast and safe non-bleaching method for forensic skeletal preparation. J Forensic Sci 48:2002034. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2002034
doi: 10.1520/JFS2002034
Mahon T-J, Maboke N, Myburgh J (2021) The use of different detergents in skeletal preparations. Forensic Sci Int 327:110967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110967
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110967 pubmed: 34455400
Dayal MR, Kegley ADT, Štrkalj G, Bidmos MA, Kuykendall KL (2009) The history and composition of the Raymond A. Dart Collection of Human Skeletons at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol 140:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21072
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21072 pubmed: 19382178

Auteurs

C A Keyes (CA)

Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. craig.keyes@wits.ac.za.

K R Giltrow (KR)

Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

T-J Mahon (TJ)

Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH