Nationwide consensus on the clinical management of treatment-resistant depression in Italy: a Delphi panel.
Antidepressants
Consensus statement
Customized treatment
Esketamine
Major depressive disorder
Treatment-resistant depression
Journal
Annals of general psychiatry
ISSN: 1744-859X
Titre abrégé: Ann Gen Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101236515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Nov 2023
23 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2023
accepted:
09
11
2023
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
23
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined by the European Medicines Agency as a lack of clinically meaningful improvement after treatment, with at least two different antidepressants. Individual, familiar, and socio-economic burden of TRD is huge. Given the lack of clear guidelines, the large variability of TRD approaches across different countries and the availability of new medications to meet the need of effective and rapid acting therapeutic strategies, it is important to understand the consensus regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment pathways of patients with TRD in Italian routine clinical practice, particularly in view of the recent availability of esketamine nasal spray. A Delphi questionnaire with 17 statements (with a 7 points Likert scale for agreement) was administered via a customized web-based platform to Italian psychiatrists with at least 5 years of experience and specific expertise in the field of depression. In the second-round physicians were asked to answer the same statements considering the interquartile range of each question as an index of their colleagues' responses. Stata 16.1 software was used for the analyses. Sixty panellists, representative of the Italian territory, answered the questionnaire at the first round. For 8/17 statements more than 75% of panellists reached agreement and a high consensus as they assigned similar scores; for 4 statements the panellists assigned similar scores but in the middle of the Likert scale showing a moderate agreement with the statement, while for 5 statements there was indecision in the agreement and low consensus with the statement. This Delphi Panel showed that there is a wide heterogeneity in Italy in the management of TRD patients, and a compelling need of standardised strategies and treatments specifically approved for TRD. A high level of consensus and agreement was obtained about the importance of adding lithium and/or antipsychotics as augmentation therapies and in the meantime about the need for long-term maintenance therapy. A high level of consensus and agreement was equally reached for the identification of esketamine nasal spray as the best option for TRD patients and for the possibility to administrate without difficulties esketamine in a community outpatient setting, highlighting the benefit of an appropriate educational support for patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined by the European Medicines Agency as a lack of clinically meaningful improvement after treatment, with at least two different antidepressants. Individual, familiar, and socio-economic burden of TRD is huge. Given the lack of clear guidelines, the large variability of TRD approaches across different countries and the availability of new medications to meet the need of effective and rapid acting therapeutic strategies, it is important to understand the consensus regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment pathways of patients with TRD in Italian routine clinical practice, particularly in view of the recent availability of esketamine nasal spray.
METHODS
METHODS
A Delphi questionnaire with 17 statements (with a 7 points Likert scale for agreement) was administered via a customized web-based platform to Italian psychiatrists with at least 5 years of experience and specific expertise in the field of depression. In the second-round physicians were asked to answer the same statements considering the interquartile range of each question as an index of their colleagues' responses. Stata 16.1 software was used for the analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty panellists, representative of the Italian territory, answered the questionnaire at the first round. For 8/17 statements more than 75% of panellists reached agreement and a high consensus as they assigned similar scores; for 4 statements the panellists assigned similar scores but in the middle of the Likert scale showing a moderate agreement with the statement, while for 5 statements there was indecision in the agreement and low consensus with the statement.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This Delphi Panel showed that there is a wide heterogeneity in Italy in the management of TRD patients, and a compelling need of standardised strategies and treatments specifically approved for TRD. A high level of consensus and agreement was obtained about the importance of adding lithium and/or antipsychotics as augmentation therapies and in the meantime about the need for long-term maintenance therapy. A high level of consensus and agreement was equally reached for the identification of esketamine nasal spray as the best option for TRD patients and for the possibility to administrate without difficulties esketamine in a community outpatient setting, highlighting the benefit of an appropriate educational support for patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37996836
doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00478-7
pii: 10.1186/s12991-023-00478-7
pmc: PMC10668442
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
48Investigateurs
Tiziano Acciavatti
(T)
Umberto Albert
(U)
Sara Andreoli
(S)
Ileana Andriola
(I)
Fausto Antonielli Romanini
(FA)
Roberta Bassetti
(R)
Francesca Bettini
(F)
Graziella Boi
(G)
Paolo Cacciani
(P)
Paola Calò
(P)
Alessandro Carano
(A)
Ilaria Casolaro
(I)
Stefania Chiappini
(S)
Paola Clemente
(P)
Virginia D'Ambrosio
(V)
Giacomo d'Andrea
(G)
Tiziana Dario
(T)
Pasquale De Fazio
(P)
Renato de Filippis
(R)
Francesco Di Carlo
(F)
Marco Di Nicola
(M)
Luca Di Paolo
(L)
Giampaolo Di Piazza
(G)
Gabriele Di Salvo
(G)
Monica Fiori
(M)
Alessandro Gentile
(A)
Matteo Lupi
(M)
Mirko Manchia
(M)
Matteo Marcatili
(M)
Livio Marchiaro
(L)
Vassilis Martiadis
(V)
Giulia Menculini
(G)
Giovanni Migliarese
(G)
Gaetano Nappi
(G)
Domenica Nucifora
(D)
Miriam Olivola
(M)
Claudia Palumbo
(C)
Elena Paschetta
(E)
Ettore Pasculli
(E)
Enrico Pessina
(E)
Federica Pinna
(F)
Marianna Pinto
(M)
Davide Piu
(D)
Donato Gerolamo Posadinu
(DG)
Fabiola Raffone
(F)
Valerio Ricci
(V)
Ilario Ritacco
(I)
Gianluca Rosso
(G)
Elisa Simonini
(E)
Antonio Ventriglio
(A)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 05;12:769693
pubmed: 34803777
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 May;215(1):143-8
pubmed: 21161184
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jul 05;13:629-635
pubmed: 34262308
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jul 1;290:334-344
pubmed: 34044256
World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):394-412
pubmed: 37713549
Lancet. 2023 Jun 24;401(10394):2110
pubmed: 37355287
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 15;283:115-122
pubmed: 33545659
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;26(4):352-362
pubmed: 35174754
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17
pubmed: 17074942
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;214(1):42-51
pubmed: 30457075
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 1;176(6):428-438
pubmed: 31109201
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;22(6):468-482
pubmed: 33138665
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Feb;41(2):209-225
pubmed: 36662417
J Affect Disord. 2022 Dec 15;319:646-654
pubmed: 36167246
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:195-210
pubmed: 30195173
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Mar;32:94-103
pubmed: 31973999
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:369-88
pubmed: 22654508