Public willingness to receive chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis vaccines: a scoping review.
Chlamydia trachomatis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Treponema pallidum
Vaccine acceptability
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Nov 2023
23 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
10
06
2023
accepted:
16
11
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
23
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) like chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis contribute significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Researchers are pursuing vaccines for these STIs, and a clinical trial is currently underway for a chlamydia vaccine. However, there is little research available on individuals' willingness to receive chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis vaccines. The purpose of this analysis was to map the existing literature we have on individuals' willingness to receive these bacterial/parasitic STI vaccines and understand what information on vaccine acceptability is still needed. We searched seven databases for literature on STI vaccine acceptability, then conducted title/abstract and full-text reviews to assess eligibility. All reviews and abstractions were conducted blindly by two reviewers, with discrepancies settled by discussion or the input of a third reviewer. Eight of the original 2,259 texts of interest met inclusion criteria. After data abstraction, we found that gonorrhea was the most commonly examined, followed by chlamydia and syphilis. Trichomoniasis vaccine acceptability was not reported. Most texts reported high acceptability, but there did not appear to be data describing how vaccine characteristics affect acceptability. Similarly, while the literature covers a variety of populations, most of the study populations were based out of the United States or Canada and were patrons of healthcare facilities or participants from a larger health intervention study. Therefore, more information is needed on populations outside North America, and on groups with lower healthcare access and utilization. As the incidence of bacterial and parasitic STIs increase, and as we grow nearer vaccines for these illnesses, understanding how likely the public is to accept and receive these vaccines is crucial to their success. While the existing literature describes STI vaccine acceptability in a variety of populations, their overall number is small. More research into STI vaccine acceptability outside of North America, and especially examining how factors like number of doses, timing, and cost influence vaccine acceptability is needed to ensure effective future vaccine rollouts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) like chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis contribute significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Researchers are pursuing vaccines for these STIs, and a clinical trial is currently underway for a chlamydia vaccine. However, there is little research available on individuals' willingness to receive chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis vaccines. The purpose of this analysis was to map the existing literature we have on individuals' willingness to receive these bacterial/parasitic STI vaccines and understand what information on vaccine acceptability is still needed.
METHODS
METHODS
We searched seven databases for literature on STI vaccine acceptability, then conducted title/abstract and full-text reviews to assess eligibility. All reviews and abstractions were conducted blindly by two reviewers, with discrepancies settled by discussion or the input of a third reviewer.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eight of the original 2,259 texts of interest met inclusion criteria. After data abstraction, we found that gonorrhea was the most commonly examined, followed by chlamydia and syphilis. Trichomoniasis vaccine acceptability was not reported. Most texts reported high acceptability, but there did not appear to be data describing how vaccine characteristics affect acceptability. Similarly, while the literature covers a variety of populations, most of the study populations were based out of the United States or Canada and were patrons of healthcare facilities or participants from a larger health intervention study. Therefore, more information is needed on populations outside North America, and on groups with lower healthcare access and utilization.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
As the incidence of bacterial and parasitic STIs increase, and as we grow nearer vaccines for these illnesses, understanding how likely the public is to accept and receive these vaccines is crucial to their success. While the existing literature describes STI vaccine acceptability in a variety of populations, their overall number is small. More research into STI vaccine acceptability outside of North America, and especially examining how factors like number of doses, timing, and cost influence vaccine acceptability is needed to ensure effective future vaccine rollouts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37996885
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10334-9
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10334-9
pmc: PMC10668406
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1290Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K01 AI137123
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;17(8):e235-e279
pubmed: 28701272
Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Apr 1;48(4):208-214
pubmed: 33492089
J Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;192(10):1836-44
pubmed: 16235186
PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 7;14(7):e1002344
pubmed: 28686231
Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Jan;27(1):49-52
pubmed: 10654869
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 14;37(35):4896-4905
pubmed: 31301918
Sex Transm Infect. 2020 Nov;96(7):494-500
pubmed: 32457116
Value Health. 2023 Feb;26(2):261-268
pubmed: 36055920
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;9(8):
pubmed: 34452026
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;30(1):77-86
pubmed: 27922851
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 26;8(1):3640
pubmed: 29483541
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 May 9;:
pubmed: 35533697
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 01;97(8):548-562P
pubmed: 31384073
Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Oct;34(10):778-82
pubmed: 17551416
Can J Public Health. 2022 Oct;113(5):776-785
pubmed: 35616872
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Sep;37(3):179-86
pubmed: 16109336
Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;55(3):295-305
pubmed: 32762851
J Community Health. 2023 Aug;48(4):678-686
pubmed: 36920709
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Apr;76(2):73-9
pubmed: 10858706
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 2;38(27):4325-4335
pubmed: 32387013
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Mar 26;18:101082
pubmed: 35493405
Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1145-1150
pubmed: 33689190
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):1290
pubmed: 37996885
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(1):5-16
pubmed: 17394537
Sex Health. 2018 Jul;15(4):325-334
pubmed: 29925463
Pediatrics. 2021 Jun;147(6):
pubmed: 33941585
Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Jul 1;48(7):453-457
pubmed: 33201019
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;19(10):1091-1100
pubmed: 31416692
Sex Transm Dis. 2017 May;44(5):278-283
pubmed: 28407643
Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Mar;45(3):158-162
pubmed: 29420443
J Community Health Nurs. 2018 Jan-Mar;35(1):28-37
pubmed: 29323941
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018 Feb;30(1):137-143
pubmed: 29315111
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 11;6(3):e17713
pubmed: 21412418
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 26;33(36):4520-4525
pubmed: 26192351
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2023 Apr;70(2):211-226
pubmed: 36841591
Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Dec 1;48(12):e236-e240
pubmed: 34264905
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(7):1405-13
pubmed: 14759685
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Dec;35(12 Suppl):S13-8
pubmed: 18936725
Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr;41(2):507-31
pubmed: 16584462
Pathog Glob Health. 2022 Jun;116(4):236-243
pubmed: 34928187
Vaccine. 2023 Sep 22;41(41):6127-6133
pubmed: 37659897
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;9(7):
pubmed: 34358218
Vaccine. 2012 May 14;30(23):3445-52
pubmed: 22449423
Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Aug 1;48(8):e116-e118
pubmed: 33201020
J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(8):1060-71
pubmed: 18987079
Vaccine. 2021 Jun 16;39(27):3565-3581
pubmed: 34034949
Am J Public Health. 2002 Mar;92(3):378-81
pubmed: 11867314
BJOG. 2021 Nov;128(12):1907-1915
pubmed: 34036690
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 9;38(28):4362-4373
pubmed: 32359875
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002 Mar-Apr;47(2):80-96
pubmed: 12019990
Vaccine. 2023 Apr 6;41(15):2485-2494
pubmed: 36894397
Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Jan 1;49(1):76-80
pubmed: 34264906
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Nov;144(15):3244-3252
pubmed: 27477823
Health Soc Work. 2021 May 10;46(1):22-32
pubmed: 33637990
Int J STD AIDS. 2000 Mar;11(3):170-2
pubmed: 10726940
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):821
pubmed: 31238911