Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plant knowledge among three ethnic groups in peri-urban areas of south-central Ethiopia.
Ethiopia
Ethnobotanical knowledge
Medicinal plants
Peri-urban
South-central Ethiopia
Journal
Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
ISSN: 1746-4269
Titre abrégé: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Nov 2023
23 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
10
09
2023
accepted:
08
11
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
24
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Documenting traditional knowledge on plant use among ethnic groups has enabled researchers to obtain a better understanding of how indigenous flora is seen and used in daily life. Their therapeutic applications will also encourage future conservation and phytochemical research, potentially leading to the development of novel drugs. However, past ethnobotanical studies conducted in Ethiopia mainly focused on rural areas, and limited coverage to document the ethnobotanical knowledge at the rural‒urban interface. Therefore, this study was conducted to document and analyze traditional ethnobotanical knowledge on medicinal plants among three selected ethnic groups in peri-urban areas of south-central Ethiopia. In addition, we attempted to investigate the range of cultural similarity and disparity between the studied ethnic groups in relation to traditional medicinal plants and diseases treated. Data were collected using semistructured questionnaires and in-depth interviews of 189 key informants, floristic species inventories, and field observations. Several cultural importance indices and Rahman's similarity indices were applied to analyze the relevance of medicinal plants and cultural similarity among the ethnic groups. A total of 189 therapeutic plants representing 159 genera and 69 families were identified and documented across the three studied ethnic groups. Of these, the Sidama, Gedeo, and Oromo ethnic groups reported 28, 34, and 38%, respectively. Most medicinal plants were represented by herbs (36%), followed by shrubs (31%), trees (27%), and herbaceous climbers (7%). Rahman's similarity index (RSI) revealed considerable ethnobotanical knowledge variation among ethnic groups. Oromo and Sidama showed the highest disparity (63.8%), followed by Gedeo and Oromo (63.2%). Of the total collected therapeutic plants, 78 most important medicinal plants were selected for the cultural importance analysis, which revealed that Croton macrostachyus Hochst. ex Delile scored the highest point in the Gedeo and Oromo ethnic groups and Zingiber officinale Roscoe in the Sidama ethnic group. Whereas Cinnamomum verum J.Presl, Psidium guajava L., and Melia azedarach L. are the least. The present study revealed the presence of cultural differences in medicinal plant knowledge practices and therapeutic plant use among the studied ethnic groups in rural-urban interface areas of south-central Ethiopia. The diverse healing potential of plants would support future pharmacological investigations, emphasizing the need for adequate documentation of indigenous knowledge and versatile flora to prevent their further loss.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Documenting traditional knowledge on plant use among ethnic groups has enabled researchers to obtain a better understanding of how indigenous flora is seen and used in daily life. Their therapeutic applications will also encourage future conservation and phytochemical research, potentially leading to the development of novel drugs. However, past ethnobotanical studies conducted in Ethiopia mainly focused on rural areas, and limited coverage to document the ethnobotanical knowledge at the rural‒urban interface. Therefore, this study was conducted to document and analyze traditional ethnobotanical knowledge on medicinal plants among three selected ethnic groups in peri-urban areas of south-central Ethiopia. In addition, we attempted to investigate the range of cultural similarity and disparity between the studied ethnic groups in relation to traditional medicinal plants and diseases treated.
METHODS
METHODS
Data were collected using semistructured questionnaires and in-depth interviews of 189 key informants, floristic species inventories, and field observations. Several cultural importance indices and Rahman's similarity indices were applied to analyze the relevance of medicinal plants and cultural similarity among the ethnic groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 189 therapeutic plants representing 159 genera and 69 families were identified and documented across the three studied ethnic groups. Of these, the Sidama, Gedeo, and Oromo ethnic groups reported 28, 34, and 38%, respectively. Most medicinal plants were represented by herbs (36%), followed by shrubs (31%), trees (27%), and herbaceous climbers (7%). Rahman's similarity index (RSI) revealed considerable ethnobotanical knowledge variation among ethnic groups. Oromo and Sidama showed the highest disparity (63.8%), followed by Gedeo and Oromo (63.2%). Of the total collected therapeutic plants, 78 most important medicinal plants were selected for the cultural importance analysis, which revealed that Croton macrostachyus Hochst. ex Delile scored the highest point in the Gedeo and Oromo ethnic groups and Zingiber officinale Roscoe in the Sidama ethnic group. Whereas Cinnamomum verum J.Presl, Psidium guajava L., and Melia azedarach L. are the least.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The present study revealed the presence of cultural differences in medicinal plant knowledge practices and therapeutic plant use among the studied ethnic groups in rural-urban interface areas of south-central Ethiopia. The diverse healing potential of plants would support future pharmacological investigations, emphasizing the need for adequate documentation of indigenous knowledge and versatile flora to prevent their further loss.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37996915
doi: 10.1186/s13002-023-00629-w
pii: 10.1186/s13002-023-00629-w
pmc: PMC10668360
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
55Subventions
Organisme : Sokoine University of Agriculture
ID : Sida Grant Number 13394
Organisme : Sokoine University of Agriculture
ID : Sida Grant Number 13394
Organisme : Sokoine University of Agriculture
ID : Sida Grant Number 13394
Organisme : Sokoine University of Agriculture
ID : Sida Grant Number 13394
Organisme : Sokoine University of Agriculture
ID : Sida Grant Number 13394
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151693
pubmed: 26986077
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Oct 03;2018:6274021
pubmed: 30402131
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 12;281(1780):20132768
pubmed: 24523269
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006 Apr 25;2:21
pubmed: 16638119
Trop Med Health. 2022 Nov 9;50(1):85
pubmed: 36352467
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Jun 21;18(1):48
pubmed: 35729583
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2017 May;30(3):729-745
pubmed: 28653916
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0243151
pubmed: 33439877
J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Jun 20;168:201-7
pubmed: 25666425
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020 Oct 27;16(1):65
pubmed: 33109243
J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Feb 3;151(2):921-30
pubmed: 24342778
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020 May 24;16(1):29
pubmed: 32448334
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2021 Oct 18;17(1):61
pubmed: 34663365
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Jul 09;9:48
pubmed: 23837693
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Sep 14;9(1):66
pubmed: 24034131
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 01;12:633921
pubmed: 34140888
Nat Plants. 2015 Feb 02;1:14021
pubmed: 27246758
J Ethnopharmacol. 2007 Apr 4;110(3):516-25
pubmed: 17101251
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Jan 13;12:5
pubmed: 26762159
J Ethnopharmacol. 2018 Jun 28;220:87-93
pubmed: 29601979
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Dec 14;2021:6748052
pubmed: 34950215
Data Brief. 2018 Mar 22;18:747-752
pubmed: 29900231
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020 May 24;16(1):27
pubmed: 32448337
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 May 09;10:43
pubmed: 24885937
Foods. 2020 May 08;9(5):
pubmed: 32397112
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169373
pubmed: 28076407
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Oct 4;13(1):55
pubmed: 28978342
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005 Sep;57(9):1127-52
pubmed: 16105234
Biology (Basel). 2021 Aug 26;10(9):
pubmed: 34571704
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Jun 11;14(1):40
pubmed: 29890995
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Aug 28;9(1):63
pubmed: 23984919
Biomolecules. 2020 Jan 07;10(1):
pubmed: 31936168
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171896
pubmed: 28192466
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24):
pubmed: 34103398
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019 Feb 5;15(1):8
pubmed: 30722779
Foods. 2019 May 30;8(6):
pubmed: 31151279
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019 May 24;15(1):25
pubmed: 31126296
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Mar 18;2018:4630371
pubmed: 29743923
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009 Nov 13;5:34
pubmed: 19912633
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 10;12:790567
pubmed: 35082673
Heliyon. 2021 Sep 30;7(9):e08095
pubmed: 34632154