Consideration of factors associated with inequalities in interventions that support health-care professionals' interaction with patients to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use: a systematic review.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 15 05 2023
revised: 07 09 2023
accepted: 22 09 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 24 11 2023
entrez: 24 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tackling the public health challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires promotion of appropriate antimicrobial use by health-care professionals. The objective of this review was to identify interventions that facilitate appropriate antimicrobial behaviours when health-care professionals interact with patients and any considerations for factors associated with health inequalities. For this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar) from Jan 31, 2023, to Feb 8, 2023. We included search terms such as antimicrobial use/prescribing, health-care professionals, and AMR programmes. We included any relevant primary study published from year 2010 and in English. We conducted forward and backward citation searching from included studies on March 27, 2023. We extracted information on the interventions following the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guideline and examined reports on how the interventions might impact on inequalities. We performed quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). We conducted descriptive synthesis. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023395642). After screening 4979 records, we included 59 studies. Most studies were randomised trials (n=25) and qualitative/mixed methods studies (n=16). Included studies covered 16 countries, particularly the UK (n=16) and the USA (n=13). Most studies (n=34) fulfilled at least 80% of the relevant quality criteria, but 12 studies fulfilled less than 50%. Many interventions were established strategies (eg, TARGET: Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education and Tools). Patient interaction elements of the interventions often involved using education materials (eg, digital/paper leaflets, and videos) and point-of-care testing. While many studies (n=49) included participants from disadvantaged groups, only three examined how outcomes differ between groups. In those studies, antimicrobial prescription was not associated with age, sex, and level of learning disability. Some other studies reported issues with language barriers and potential digital exclusion, especially for older people. We might have missed some relevant studies due to publication year and language restrictions. Notwithstanding, this review showed that the potential impact of factors associated with health inequalities are not routinely considered during the implementation and evaluation of interventions to improve health-care professionals' interaction with patients. Future work should routinely consider this to help mitigate potential inequalities. UK Health Security Agency.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Tackling the public health challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires promotion of appropriate antimicrobial use by health-care professionals. The objective of this review was to identify interventions that facilitate appropriate antimicrobial behaviours when health-care professionals interact with patients and any considerations for factors associated with health inequalities.
METHODS METHODS
For this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar) from Jan 31, 2023, to Feb 8, 2023. We included search terms such as antimicrobial use/prescribing, health-care professionals, and AMR programmes. We included any relevant primary study published from year 2010 and in English. We conducted forward and backward citation searching from included studies on March 27, 2023. We extracted information on the interventions following the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guideline and examined reports on how the interventions might impact on inequalities. We performed quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). We conducted descriptive synthesis. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023395642).
FINDINGS RESULTS
After screening 4979 records, we included 59 studies. Most studies were randomised trials (n=25) and qualitative/mixed methods studies (n=16). Included studies covered 16 countries, particularly the UK (n=16) and the USA (n=13). Most studies (n=34) fulfilled at least 80% of the relevant quality criteria, but 12 studies fulfilled less than 50%. Many interventions were established strategies (eg, TARGET: Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education and Tools). Patient interaction elements of the interventions often involved using education materials (eg, digital/paper leaflets, and videos) and point-of-care testing. While many studies (n=49) included participants from disadvantaged groups, only three examined how outcomes differ between groups. In those studies, antimicrobial prescription was not associated with age, sex, and level of learning disability. Some other studies reported issues with language barriers and potential digital exclusion, especially for older people.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
We might have missed some relevant studies due to publication year and language restrictions. Notwithstanding, this review showed that the potential impact of factors associated with health inequalities are not routinely considered during the implementation and evaluation of interventions to improve health-care professionals' interaction with patients. Future work should routinely consider this to help mitigate potential inequalities.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
UK Health Security Agency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37997065
pii: S0140-6736(23)02114-1
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02114-1
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Infective Agents 0

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S25

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Abimbola Ayorinde (A)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Electronic address: a.ayorinde.1@warwick.ac.uk.

Iman Ghosh (I)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Junaid Shaikh (J)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Victoria Adetunji (V)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Anna Brown (A)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Mary Jordan (M)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Ellie Gilham (E)

UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.

Daniel Todkill (D)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Diane Ashiru-Oredope (D)

UK Health Security Agency, London, UK; School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH