Automated office blood pressure measurement with the assistance of an instructional video in patients with hypertension.
Journal
Blood pressure monitoring
ISSN: 1473-5725
Titre abrégé: Blood Press Monit
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9606438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
24
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement often requires assistance. Accompanied by an instructional video, AOBP measurement could be performed independently by patients. Seventy-five patients with hypertension were enrolled. AOBP was measured three times at 1-min intervals after 5 min of rest by an automated BP measurement device with the assistance of an animated instructional video. The video was designed originally to instruct patients on the way to measure BP appropriately. Perceived stress was evaluated using a questionnaire after the AOBP measurement. Office BP was measured three times using the same device. Home BP measurement was performed on 5 consecutive days. The mean age of the patients was 74.5 ± 10.6 years, and 96% were taking antihypertensive drugs. Mean AOBP, office BP and home BP measurements were 135.2 ± 17.2/81.3 ± 11.1, 139.3 ± 16.3/78.6 ± 10.9 and 129.2 ± 16.7/72.7 ± 8.9 mmHg, respectively. Regarding SBP, the mean AOBP was significantly lower than office BP (P = 0.005) and higher than home BP (P = 0.004). The differences in SBP and DBP between AOBP and home BP measurements were significantly related to patients' perceived stress when performing AOBP measurements (r = 0.289; P = 0.013 and r = 0.328; P = 0.004). In a multivariate analysis, patients' perceived stress was a significant predictor of the difference between AOBP and home BP (P = 0.013), even after adjusting for age, sex, BMI and mean of AOBP and home BP. AOBP values measured with the assistance of an instructional video were between conventional office and home BP measurements. Perceived stress during AOBP measurement was related to the difference in AOBP from home BP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37997451
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000685
pii: 00126097-990000000-00087
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Ishikawa J, Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, McDoniel S, Feltheimer SD, Stergiou GS, et al. Automatic office blood pressure measured without doctors or nurses present. Blood Press Monit 2012; 17:96–102.
Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure - 15 years to sprint. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2016; 18:721–724.
Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:351–362.
Qi W, Wu Q, Wu Y, Peng Q, Li P, Cheng X, et al. Talking with a doctor during a visit elicits increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Blood Press Monit 2017; 22:265–267.
Andreadis EA, Geladari CV, Angelopoulos ET, Savva FS, Georgantoni AI, Papademetriou V. Attended and unattended automated office blood pressure measurements have better agreement with ambulatory monitoring than conventional office readings. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7:e008994.
Kollias A, Stambolliu E, Kyriakoulis KG, Gravvani A, Stergiou GS. Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019; 21:148–155.
Alpert BS. Validation of the A&D UM-212BLE monitor according to ISO 81060-2, 2018: a device with clinically important programmability. Blood Press Monit 2023; 28:113–115.
Alpert BS. Validation of the A&D UA-651 Plus/UA-651SL Plus automated sphygmomanometer according to the ISO 81060-2, 2018 and ISO 81060-2 Amendment 1, 2020, which resulted in the currently pending Amendment to Amendment 1. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2022; 24:513–518.
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press 2018; 27:314–340.
Pappaccogli M, Di Monaco S, Perlo E, Burrello J, D’Ascenzo F, Veglio F, et al. Comparison of automated office blood pressure with office and out-off-office measurement techniques. Hypertension 2019; 73:481–490.
Mizuno H, Hoshide S, Yano Y, Nozue R, Kario K. Comparison of brachial blood pressure and central blood pressure in attended, unattended, and unattended standing situations. Hypertens Res 2021; 44:1283–1290.
Toba A, Ishikawa J, Suzuki A, Harada K. Automated office blood pressure measurement by elderly patients in the waiting room. Blood Press Monit 2021; 26:321–327.
Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71:e127–e248.
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. [2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension]. Kardiol Pol 2019; 77:71–159.
Ward AM, Takahashi O, Stevens R, Heneghan C. Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Hypertens 2012; 30:449–456.
Nesti N, Pieraccioli M, Mossello E, Sgrilli F, Bulgaresi M, Crescioli E, et al. Tolerability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in cognitively impaired elderly. Blood Press 2014; 23:377–380.
Plichart M, Seux ML, Caillard L, Chaussade E, Vidal JS, Boully C, et al. Home blood pressure measurement in elderly patients with cognitive impairment: comparison of agreement between relative-measured blood pressure and automated blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit 2013; 18:208–214.
Cacciolati C, Tzourio C, Dufouil C, Alpérovitch A, Hanon O. Feasibility of home blood pressure measurement in elderly individuals: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based sample. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25:1279–1285.
Imai Y, Ohkubo T, Tsuji I, Hozawa A, Nagai K, Kikuya M, et al. Relationships among blood pressures obtained using different measurement methods in the general population of Ohasama, Japan. Hypertens Res 1999; 22:261–272.
Giannattasio C, Ferrari AU, Mancia G. Alterations in neural cardiovascular control mechanisms with ageing. J Hypertens Suppl 1994; 12:S13–S17.
Rutan GH, Hermanson B, Bild DE, Kittner SJ, LaBaw F, Tell GS. Orthostatic hypotension in older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Hypertension. 1992; 19:508–519.
Luciano GL, Brennan MJ, Rothberg MB. Postprandial hypotension. Am J Med 2010; 123:281.e1–281.e6.
McManus RJ, Mant J, Haque MS, Bray EP, Bryan S, Greenfield SM, et al. Effect of self-monitoring and medication self-titration on systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: the TASMIN-SR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312:799–808.
Myers MG, Kaczorowski J. Are automated office blood pressure readings more variable than home readings? Hypertension 2020; 75:1179–1183.
Andreadis EA, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Agaliotis GD, Kravvariti SD, Mousoulis GP. Automated office versus home measurement of blood pressure in the assessment of morning hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2012; 17:24–34.
Miao H, Yang S, Zhang Y. Differences of blood pressure measured at clinic versus at home in the morning and in the evening in Europe and Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2022; 24:677–688.
Gerin W, Marion RM, Friedman R, James GD, Bovbjerg DH, Pickering TG. How should we measure blood pressure in the doctor’s office? Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:257–262.
Swain A, Suls J. Reproducibility of blood pressure and heart rate reactivity: a meta-analysis. Psychophysiology 1996; 33:162–174.
Uchino BN, Birmingham W, Berg CA. Are older adults less or more physiologically reactive? a meta-analysis of age-related differences in cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory tasks. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010; 65B:154–162.
Koffer RE, Kamarck TW. A longitudinal study of age-based change in blood pressure reactivity and negative affect reactivity to natural stressors. Psychosom Med 2022; 84:612–620.
Kario K, Schwartz JE, Gerin W, Robayo N, Maceo E, Pickering TG. Psychological and physical stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity and diurnal blood pressure variation in women with different work shifts. Hypertens Res 2002; 25:543–551.
Flaa A, Eide IK, Kjeldsen SE, Rostrup M. Sympathoadrenal stress reactivity is a predictor of future blood pressure: an 18-year follow-up study. Hypertension 2008; 52:336–341.