Synthetic Megavoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Generation for Improved Contouring Accuracy of Cardiac Pacemakers.
CT/CBCT artifacts
generative adversarial networks
machine learning
pacemaker visualization
Journal
Journal of imaging
ISSN: 2313-433X
Titre abrégé: J Imaging
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101698819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
20
09
2023
revised:
31
10
2023
accepted:
02
11
2023
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
24
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we aimed to enhance the contouring accuracy of cardiac pacemakers by improving their visualization using deep learning models to predict MV CBCT images based on kV CT or CBCT images. Ten pacemakers and four thorax phantoms were included, creating a total of 35 combinations. Each combination was imaged on a Varian Halcyon (kV/MV CBCT images) and Siemens SOMATOM CT scanner (kV CT images). Two generative adversarial network (GAN)-based models, cycleGAN and conditional GAN (cGAN), were trained to generate synthetic MV (sMV) CBCT images from kV CT/CBCT images using twenty-eight datasets (80%). The pacemakers in the sMV CBCT images and original MV CBCT images were manually delineated and reviewed by three users. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD) were used to compare contour accuracy. Visual inspection showed the improved visualization of pacemakers on sMV CBCT images compared to original kV CT/CBCT images. Moreover, cGAN demonstrated superior performance in enhancing pacemaker visualization compared to cycleGAN. The mean DSC, HD95, and MSD for contours on sMV CBCT images generated from kV CT/CBCT images were 0.91 ± 0.02/0.92 ± 0.01, 1.38 ± 0.31 mm/1.18 ± 0.20 mm, and 0.42 ± 0.07 mm/0.36 ± 0.06 mm using the cGAN model. Deep learning-based methods, specifically cycleGAN and cGAN, can effectively enhance the visualization of pacemakers in thorax kV CT/CBCT images, therefore improving the contouring precision of these devices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37998092
pii: jimaging9110245
doi: 10.3390/jimaging9110245
pmc: PMC10672228
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):285-292
pubmed: 28857407
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep;71:93-102
pubmed: 32464243
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:60-69
pubmed: 30292274
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Apr;217:106700
pubmed: 35228146
Technol Health Care. 2020;28(S1):273-287
pubmed: 32364160
Med Phys. 2023 Feb;50(2):879-893
pubmed: 36183234
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):e881-e912
pubmed: 32215937
Phys Med Biol. 2002 May 7;47(9):1485-92
pubmed: 12043814
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Jun;75(3):271-8
pubmed: 15890419
Radiother Oncol. 2006 May;79(2):198-202
pubmed: 16677729
J Nucl Med. 2005 Mar;46(3):436-43
pubmed: 15750156
Med Phys. 2019 Dec;46(12):e823-e834
pubmed: 31811792
Radiother Oncol. 2000 Apr;55(1):65-73
pubmed: 10788690
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Dec 23;11(1):3115
pubmed: 20160685
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jun;37(6):1348-1357
pubmed: 29870364
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):7151-7161
pubmed: 33630164
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 May;70(4):1-115
pubmed: 34029179
Rofo. 2018 Jan;190(1):31-41
pubmed: 28934809
Med Phys. 2023 Jul;50(7):4399-4414
pubmed: 36698291
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 10;12:1024160
pubmed: 36439465
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 7;58(21):7463-79
pubmed: 24099782