Enhancing Diagnostic Decision-Making: Ensemble Learning Techniques for Reliable Stress Level Classification.
academic
boosting
conventional
metrics
mitigate
model
performance
practical analysis
routine
stress
students
tension
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Nov 2023
16 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
17
09
2023
revised:
30
10
2023
accepted:
08
11
2023
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
24
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An intense level of academic pressure causes students to experience stress, and if this stress is not addressed, it can cause adverse mental and physical effects. Since the pandemic situation, students have received more assignments and other tasks due to the shift of classes to an online mode. Students may not realize that they are stressed, but it may be evident from other factors, including sleep deprivation and changes in eating habits. In this context, this paper presents a novel ensemble learning approach that proposes an architecture for stress level classification. It analyzes certain factors such as the sleep hours, productive time periods, screen time, weekly assignments and their submission statuses, and the studying methodology that contribute to stress among the students by collecting a survey from the student community. The survey data are preprocessed to categorize stress levels into three categories: highly stressed, manageable stress, and no stress. For the analysis of the minority class, oversampling methodology is used to remove the imbalance in the dataset, and decision tree, random forest classifier, AdaBoost, gradient boost, and ensemble learning algorithms with various combinations are implemented. To assess the model's performance, different metrics were used, such as the confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results showed that the efficient ensemble learning academic stress classifier gave an accuracy of 93.48% and an F1 score of 93.14%. Fivefold cross-validation was also performed, and an accuracy of 93.45% was achieved. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) value gave an accuracy of 98% for the no-stress category, while providing a 91% true positive rate for manageable and high-stress classes. The proposed ensemble learning with fivefold cross-validation outperformed various state-of-the-art algorithms to predict the stress level accurately. By using these results, students can identify areas for improvement, thereby reducing their stress levels and altering their academic lifestyles, thereby making our stress prediction approach more effective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37998591
pii: diagnostics13223455
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223455
pmc: PMC10670633
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Smart Health (Amst). 2022 Mar;23:100242
pubmed: 34926779
Br J Health Psychol. 2007 Feb;12(Pt 1):125-44
pubmed: 17288670
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 19;9(10):
pubmed: 33086558
WMJ. 1998 Dec;97(11):34-8
pubmed: 9894438
Health Psychol Open. 2015 Jul 30;2(2):2055102915596714
pubmed: 28070363
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e22817
pubmed: 32897868
Int Conf Affect Comput Intell Interact Workshops. 2015 Sep;2015:222-228
pubmed: 28515966
Data Brief. 2021 Dec;39:107659
pubmed: 34869802
J Health Popul Nutr. 2021 Nov 27;40(1):50
pubmed: 34838133