Benefits of Enacting and Observing Gestures on Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
embodied learning
gesture
language learning
sensorimotor simulation
Journal
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-328X
Titre abrégé: Behav Sci (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101576826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Nov 2023
10 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
13
09
2023
revised:
20
10
2023
accepted:
24
10
2023
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
24
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The integration of physical movements, such as gestures, into learning holds potential for enhancing foreign language (L2) education. Uncovering whether actively performing gestures during L2 learning is more, or equally, effective compared to simply observing such movements is central to deepening our understanding of the efficacy of movement-based learning strategies. Here, we present a meta-analysis of seven studies containing 309 participants that compares the effects of gesture self-enactment and observation on L2 vocabulary learning. The results showed that gesture observation was just as effective for L2 learning as gesture enactment, based on free recall, cued L2 recognition, and cued native language recognition performance, with a large dispersion of true effect across studies. Gesture observation may be sufficient for inducing embodied L2 learning benefits, in support of theories positing shared mechanisms underlying enactment and observation. Future studies should examine the effects of gesture-based learning over longer time periods with larger sample sizes and more diverse word classes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37998667
pii: bs13110920
doi: 10.3390/bs13110920
pmc: PMC10669578
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : Project ID 390696704-Cluster of Excellence "Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop
Références
Dev Psychol. 2020 Apr;56(4):686-698
pubmed: 32134293
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Mar;69:93-104
pubmed: 25619846
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e92002
pubmed: 24663967
J Cogn. 2020 Sep 29;3(1):31
pubmed: 33043241
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:487-510
pubmed: 29300688
Child Dev. 2013 Nov-Dec;84(6):1863-71
pubmed: 23551027
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 1;31(1):513-528
pubmed: 32959878
Child Dev. 2012 Mar-Apr;83(2):526-42
pubmed: 22304431
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130300
pubmed: 25092668
Cortex. 2013 Oct;49(9):2553-68
pubmed: 23357203
PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3690
pubmed: 18997869
Prog Brain Res. 2013;207:121-40
pubmed: 24309253
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 28;7:953
pubmed: 27445918
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Nov;137(4):706-23
pubmed: 18999362
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2090-101
pubmed: 25088127
Br J Educ Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;:
pubmed: 37722845
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2139-2154
pubmed: 31168699
Trends Neurosci. 2016 Feb;39(2):114-123
pubmed: 26774345
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):652-665
pubmed: 27604493
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Nov;94:31-44
pubmed: 30098990
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):201-10
pubmed: 17645161
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 01;10:2098
pubmed: 31632311
J Exp Psychol. 1968 Jan;76(1):Suppl:1-25
pubmed: 5672258
J Neurosci. 2021 Oct 13;41(41):8618-8631
pubmed: 34429380
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Jun;32(6):982-98
pubmed: 20645312
Dev Sci. 2012 Nov;15(6):876-84
pubmed: 23106741
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):153-168
pubmed: 34241539
J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):135-139
pubmed: 32307309
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):2
pubmed: 28203630
Hippocampus. 2018 Jun;28(6):406-415
pubmed: 29506316
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111
pubmed: 26061376
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):55-61
pubmed: 32336025
Neuropsychologia. 1995 Nov;33(11):1419-32
pubmed: 8584178
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S103-9
pubmed: 11373140
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92
pubmed: 15217330
Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):516-22
pubmed: 11760141
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):267-72
pubmed: 19222810
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):81-97
pubmed: 36456401
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 09;5:1467
pubmed: 25538671
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 01;5:673
pubmed: 25071646
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):658-70
pubmed: 10855424
Psychol Bull. 2019 Aug;145(8):765-784
pubmed: 31219263
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):495-514
pubmed: 18567247
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010247
pubmed: 27406637
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Sep;11(9):1109-16
pubmed: 19160510
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jun;207:103079
pubmed: 32422417
Cortex. 2018 Jul;104:1-11
pubmed: 29715581
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:1015
pubmed: 32670130
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 15;8:2136
pubmed: 29326617
Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;137(2):297-315
pubmed: 21355631
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jul;45(7):769-73
pubmed: 1619456
Curr Biol. 2015 Feb 16;25(4):530-5
pubmed: 25660537
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18
pubmed: 28058794
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):375-387
pubmed: 32298623
Memory. 2009 May;17(4):374-85
pubmed: 19221926
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 26;11(1):17278
pubmed: 34446772
Brain Res. 2006 Jul 26;1101(1):102-9
pubmed: 16782071