Prevalence of targetable genomic alterations in young women with advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Advanced Breast cancer
Precision oncology
Young adults
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Nov 2023
24 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
09
08
2023
accepted:
04
11
2023
medline:
24
11
2023
pubmed:
24
11
2023
entrez:
24
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Approximately 5% of breast cancers each year are diagnosed in young women < 40 years who tend to have worse clinical outcomes. We compared genomic alterations using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumor tissue among very young women (< 30 years) and young women (30-39 years) compared to women ≥ 40 years at diagnosis. 2049 advanced breast cancer cases were submitted to Foundation Medicine within a 22-month window for CGP. Hybrid-capture based CGP was performed to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations. Tumor mutational burden was determined on at least 0.8 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability was determined on at least 95 loci. Immunocyte PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Of the total cases, 28 (1.37%) were < 30 years, 159 (7.76%) were 30-39 years, and 1862 (90.87%) were ≥ 40 at time of diagnosis. Breast tumors were less likely to be estrogen receptor positive in younger women (54% of < 30 years, p > 0.05; 60% of 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 69.4% of ≥ 40 years) and more likely to be triple negative (43%, p = 0.05; 33%, p = 0.05; 26.1% respectively). Young women had higher rates of BRCA1 mutations (17.9% <30 years, p < 0.001; 10.1% 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 2.6% ≥40 years), but lower rates of CDH1 (7.1% <30 years, p > 0.05; 5.0% 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 15.4% ≥40 years) and PIK3CA mutations (17.9% <30 years, p = 0.02; 17.6% 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 40.0% ≥40 years). Our findings contribute to the growing literature demonstrating unique genetic profiles among young women diagnosed with breast cancer, compared to older women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37999916
doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07179-5
pii: 10.1007/s10549-023-07179-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, based on 2021 submission data (1999–2019) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2022) ; [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dataviz
Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, Acharya CR, Foekens JA, Zhang Y et al (2008) Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3324–3330
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2471
pubmed: 18612148
Partridge AH, Hughes ME, Warner ET, Ottesen RA, Wong YN, Edge SB et al (2016) Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and Breast Cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 34(27):3308–3314
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8013
pubmed: 27480155
Liu Z, Sahli Z, Wang Y, Wolff AC, Cope LM, Umbricht CB (2018) Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the Luminal A Breast cancer subtype: a retrospective institutional cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 172(3):689–702
doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4950-4
pubmed: 30225619
pmcid: 6786966
Waks AG, Kim D, Jain E, Snow C, Kirkner GJ, Rosenberg SM et al (2022) Somatic and germline genomic alterations in very young women with Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 28(11):2339–2348
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2572
pubmed: 35101884
pmcid: 9359721
Lee E, McKean-Cowdin R, Ma H, Spicer DV, Van Den Berg D, Bernstein L et al (2011) Characteristics of triple-negative Breast cancer in patients with a BRCA1 mutation: results from a population-based study of young women. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4373–4380
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.6446
pubmed: 22010008
pmcid: 3221522
Villarreal-Garza C, Weitzel JN, Llacuachaqui M, Sifuentes E, Magallanes-Hoyos MC, Gallardo L et al (2015) The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young Mexican women with triple-negative Breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150(2):389–394
doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3312-8
pubmed: 25716084
pmcid: 4532439
Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B, Viale G, Fumagalli D, Rastogi P et al (2021) Adjuvant olaparib for patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 384(25):2394–2405
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105215
pubmed: 34081848
pmcid: 9126186
Luen SJ, Viale G, Nik-Zainal S, Savas P, Kammler R, Dell’Orto P et al (2023) Genomic characterisation of hormone receptor-positive Breast cancer arising in very young women. Ann Oncol.
Dossus L, Benusiglio PR (2015) Lobular Breast cancer: incidence and genetic and non-genetic risk factors. Breast Cancer Res 17:37
doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0546-7
pubmed: 25848941
pmcid: 4357148
Makki J (2015) Diversity of breast carcinoma: histological subtypes and clinical relevance. Clin Med Insights Pathol 8:23–31
doi: 10.4137/CPath.S31563
pubmed: 26740749
pmcid: 4689326
Agostinetto E, Nader-Marta G, Paesmans M, Ameye L, Veys I, Buisseret L et al (2022) ROSALINE: a phase II, neoadjuvant study targeting ROS1 in combination with endocrine therapy in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Future Oncol 18(22):2383–2392
doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0358
pubmed: 35695563
Andre F, Ciruelos EM, Juric D, Loibl S, Campone M, Mayer IA et al (2021) Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced Breast cancer: final overall survival results from SOLAR-1. Ann Oncol 32(2):208–217
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.011
pubmed: 33246021