Hematological and biochemical markers influencing breast cancer risk and mortality: Prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank by multi-state models.

Biomarkers Breast cancer incidence Breast cancer mortality Multi-state model

Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 21 07 2023
revised: 29 10 2023
accepted: 13 11 2023
medline: 24 11 2023
pubmed: 24 11 2023
entrez: 24 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. However, evidence concerning hematological and biochemical markers influencing the natural history of breast cancer from in situ breast cancer to mortality is limited. In the UK Biobank cohort, 260,079 women were enrolled during 2006-2010 and were followed up until 2019 to test the 59 hematological and biochemical markers associated with breast cancer risk and mortality. The strengths of these associations were evaluated using the multivariable Cox regression models. To understand the natural history of breast cancer, multi-state survival models were further applied to examine the effects of biomarkers on transitions between different states of breast cancer. Eleven biomarkers were found to be significantly associated with the risk of invasive breast cancer, including mainly inflammatory-related biomarkers and endogenous hormones, while serum testosterone was also associated with the risk of in-situ breast cancer. Among them, C-reactive protein (CRP) was more likely to be associated with invasive breast cancer and its transition to death from breast cancer (HR for the highest quartile = 1.46, 95 % CI = 1.07-1.97), while testosterone and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) were more likely to impact the early state of breast cancer development (Testosterone: HR for the highest quartile = 1.31, 95 % CI = 1.12-1.53; IGF-1: HR for the highest quartile = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.38). Serum CRP, testosterone, and IGF-1 have different impacts on the transitions of different breast cancer states, confirming the role of chronic inflammation and endogenous hormones in breast cancer progression. This study further highlights the need of closer surveillance for these biomarkers during the breast cancer development course.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. However, evidence concerning hematological and biochemical markers influencing the natural history of breast cancer from in situ breast cancer to mortality is limited.
METHODS METHODS
In the UK Biobank cohort, 260,079 women were enrolled during 2006-2010 and were followed up until 2019 to test the 59 hematological and biochemical markers associated with breast cancer risk and mortality. The strengths of these associations were evaluated using the multivariable Cox regression models. To understand the natural history of breast cancer, multi-state survival models were further applied to examine the effects of biomarkers on transitions between different states of breast cancer.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eleven biomarkers were found to be significantly associated with the risk of invasive breast cancer, including mainly inflammatory-related biomarkers and endogenous hormones, while serum testosterone was also associated with the risk of in-situ breast cancer. Among them, C-reactive protein (CRP) was more likely to be associated with invasive breast cancer and its transition to death from breast cancer (HR for the highest quartile = 1.46, 95 % CI = 1.07-1.97), while testosterone and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) were more likely to impact the early state of breast cancer development (Testosterone: HR for the highest quartile = 1.31, 95 % CI = 1.12-1.53; IGF-1: HR for the highest quartile = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.38).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Serum CRP, testosterone, and IGF-1 have different impacts on the transitions of different breast cancer states, confirming the role of chronic inflammation and endogenous hormones in breast cancer progression. This study further highlights the need of closer surveillance for these biomarkers during the breast cancer development course.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38000092
pii: S0960-9776(23)00729-4
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103603
pmc: PMC10709613
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103603

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. HY reports receiving research funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province and Fujian Medical University, outside the submitted work. KC reports receiving research funding from the Swedish Research Council and Swedish Cancer Society, outside the submitted work. WH reports receiving research funding from Zhejiang University, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Références

Br J Cancer. 2021 Jul;125(1):126-134
pubmed: 33864017
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Dec;8(12):915-28
pubmed: 19029956
Chemotherapy. 2016;61(4):217-22
pubmed: 26905743
Anticancer Res. 2012 Aug;32(8):3223-8
pubmed: 22843896
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):807-816
pubmed: 31143958
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):1-11
pubmed: 23572296
J Perianesth Nurs. 2003 Apr;18(2):96-114; quiz 115-7
pubmed: 12710004
Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 15;80(18):4014-4021
pubmed: 32709735
J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Mar;10(3):
pubmed: 35292517
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):
pubmed: 32731638
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011 Jul-Aug;48(4):155-70
pubmed: 22035340
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Aug 2;31(8):1582-1592
pubmed: 35654356
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jul 05;17(7):
pubmed: 28678153
Arch Pharm Res. 2013 Dec;36(12):1419-31
pubmed: 24222504
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021 Dec;1876(2):188593
pubmed: 34280474
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51379
pubmed: 23300545
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 10;2(3):pky051
pubmed: 31360866
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;37(2):234-44
pubmed: 18381398
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;149(1):42-57
pubmed: 33567105
Nat Med. 2020 Feb;26(2):252-258
pubmed: 32042192
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 04;13(4):
pubmed: 33557316
World J Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb 06;9:18
pubmed: 21294915
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):102-7
pubmed: 14701771
Cancer Cell. 2020 Apr 13;37(4):496-513
pubmed: 32289273
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Oct 4;98(19):1406-15
pubmed: 17018787
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):1023-1034
pubmed: 32702310
Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769
pubmed: 33812473
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(10):2527-2533
pubmed: 23723293
Ann Oncol. 2020 May;31(5):641-649
pubmed: 32169310
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Nov;234(11):19480-19493
pubmed: 31025369
Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 03;13(3):R55
pubmed: 21639875
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;25(19):2685-90
pubmed: 17548841
Int J Cancer. 2016 Oct 1;139(7):1493-500
pubmed: 27194008
Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Apr;18(2):195-222
pubmed: 18562394
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Mar 03;2014:781857
pubmed: 24729754
Oncogene. 2018 Jan 4;37(1):28-38
pubmed: 28846105
Steroids. 2012 Jan;77(1-2):1-9
pubmed: 22015396
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779
pubmed: 25826379
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;174(1):209-218
pubmed: 30465158
Int J Cancer. 2021 Aug 1;149(3):573-584
pubmed: 33720423
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):1058-1066
pubmed: 32127398
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 May;56(3):200-223
pubmed: 30821186
Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):883-99
pubmed: 20303878
Phenomics. 2022;2(3):184-193
pubmed: 35578620
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(1):42
pubmed: 30890167
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22890
pubmed: 33120836

Auteurs

Yanyu Zhang (Y)

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health & Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122 China. Electronic address: zhangyanyu0716@163.com.

Xiaoxi Huang (X)

Department of Breast, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 350001, Fuzhou, China. Electronic address: 5558244@qq.com.

Xingxing Yu (X)

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health & Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122 China. Electronic address: yxx970104@fjmu.edu.cn.

Wei He (W)

Chronic Disease Research Institute, The Children's Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177 Sweden. Electronic address: wei.he@ki.se.

Kamila Czene (K)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177 Sweden. Electronic address: kamila.czene@ki.se.

Haomin Yang (H)

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health & Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122 China; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17177 Sweden. Electronic address: haomin.yang@ki.se.

Classifications MeSH