Patient-reported outcome parameters and disability worsening in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Detection and prediction of disability progression is a significant unmet need in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (PwPMS). Government and health agencies have deemed the use of patient-reported outcomes measurements (PROMs) in clinical practice and clinical trials a major strategic priority. Nevertheless, data documenting the clinical utility of PROMs in neurological diseases is scarce. This study evaluates if assessment of PROMs could track progression in PwPMS. Emerging blood Biomarkers in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (EmBioProMS) investigated PROMs (Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II), multiple sclerosis impact scale-29 (MSIS-29), fatigue scale for motor and cognition (FSMC)) in PwPMS (primary [PPMS] and secondary progressive MS [SPMS]). PROMs were evaluated longitudinally and compared between participants with disability progression (at baseline; retrospective evidence of disability progression (EDP), and during follow up (FU); prospective evidence of confirmed disability progression (CDP)) and those without progression. In an independent cohort of placebo participants of the phase III ORATORIO trial in PPMS, the diagnostic and prognostic value of another PROMs score (36-Item Short Form Survey [SF-36]) regarding CDP was evaluated. EmBioProMS participants with EDP in the two years prior to inclusion (n = 136/227), or who suffered from CDP during FU (number of events= 88) had worse BDI-II, MSIS-29, and FSMC scores compared to PwPMS without progression. In addition, baseline MSIS29 PROMs could provide additional, practical, cost-efficient, and remotely accessible insight about disability progression in PMS through standardized, structured, and quantifiable patient feedback.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: AA received research funding from DMSG, AMSEL, Bavarian MS Trust. MK received travel funding, speaker honoraria and research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis and Roche, all not related to this manuscript. MS received consulting and/or speaker honoraria from Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Merck, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme; none related to this work. JH reports a grant for OCT research from the Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung and Merck, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck, Alexion, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Biogen, Bayer and Horizon and non-financial support of the Sumaira-Foundation and Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation, all outside the submitted work. UKZ has received speaking fees, travel support, and financial support for research activities from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Octapharm, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva as well as EU, BMBF, BMWi and DFG. None resulted in a conflict of interest. IK has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Hexal, Horizon, Merck, Neuraxpharm, Roche/Chugai and Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. AS has no personal pecuniary interests to disclose, other than being the lead of the German MS Registry, which receives project funding from a range of public and corporate sponsors, recently including The German Innovation Fund (G-BA), The German Retirement Insurance, The German MS Trust, The German MS Society, Biogen, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. All outside the submitted work. AH received travel funding, consulting and/or speaker honoraria from Alexion, Argenx and Horizon; none related to this manuscript. MCK has served on advisory boards and received speaker fees / travel grants from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Biogen, Jansen, Alexion, Celgene / Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche and received research grants from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme and Celgene / Bristol-Myers Squibb. SG reports research support from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Hannover Biomedical Research School (HBRS) and consulting and/or speaker honoraria from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Merck all outside the submitted work. HK was an employee and shareholder of F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd during completion of the work related to this manuscript. He is currently an employee and shareholder of UCB Farchim SA, Bulle, Switzerland. JO reports grants from Hoffmann La-Roche, Biogen, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Hoffmann La-Roche, Biogen, Teva, Novartis, Celgene, Medday Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Web MD Global and Allergan, employment from Hoffmann La-Roche and is a shareholder of Hoffmann La-Roche. QW, SC are employee and shareholder of F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd. TF reports personal fees for consultancies (including data monitoring committees) in the past three years from Bayer, BiosenseWebster, Cardialysis, CSL Behring, Enanta, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, IQVIA, Immunic, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, Liva Nova, Minoryx, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Vifor; all outside the submitted work. UZ received grants from the European Research Council (ERC), German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), German Research Foundation (DFG), Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., and consulting fees from CorTec GmbH, all not related to this work. TK has received speaker honoraria and/or personal fees for advisory boards from Bayer Healthcare, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Roche Pharma, Alexion/Astra Zeneca and Biogen as well as grant support from Novartis and Chugai Pharma in the past. HT received consulting and/or speaker honoraria from Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, GSK, Jannssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA; none related to this work. All other authors report no conflict of interest in relation to this work.