Long-term risk of reoperation after modular hemiarthroplasty : Any differences between uni- or bipolar design?

Bipolar Dislocation Femoral neck fractures Hemiarthroplasty Periprosthetic Infection Unipolar

Journal

BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 02 05 2023
accepted: 11 11 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 25 11 2023
entrez: 24 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

It is unclear whether unipolar (UHA) or bipolar (BHA) hemiarthroplasty should be the preferred treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). We investigated the reoperation rate at 13 years post-fracture after BHA and UHA as treatment of FNF, including a subgroup analysis of individuals who survived 5 years or more, and described the reasons for reoperation after BHA and UHA respectively. In an observational cohort study on prospectively collected national register data, 16,216 BHA and 22,186 UHA were available for matching. A propensity score for treatment with bipolar HA was estimated using logistic regression. Matching was done using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement. Of the 16,216 BHA patients, 12,280 were matched to a UHA control. A subgroup analysis based on the matched sample excluded individuals who died within 5 years and comprised 3,637 individuals with BHA and 3,537 with UHA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 92% of the BHA group was free from reoperation at 13 years (95% CI 0.91-0.93), compared to 92% in the UHA group (CI 0.89-0.94). BHA was associated with more reoperations until 3 years. Reoperation due to infection was most common after BHA, n = 212 (1.7%) compared to n = 141 (1.1%) after UHA. Dislocation led to reoperation in 192 of the BHA cases (1.6%) and in 157 of the UHA cases (1.3%). Acetabular erosion/pain occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%. Amongst those surviving ≥ 5 years, 93% of the BHA group was free from reoperation (CI 0.92-0.94) at 13 years, 92% after UHA (CI 0.90-0.94). BHA had more reoperations during the 1st year only. The causes for reoperations showed similar rates except for acetabular erosion/pain. Here the BHA group had 2 cases (0.1%), the UHA had 39 (1.1%). With a modular hemiarthroplasty relatively few patients need a reoperation. During the first years, there is a higher reoperation rate after BHA compared to UHA. Thereafter, no differences are seen. In patients who survive ≥ 5 years after the fracture there are more reoperations due to acetabular erosion after UHA, but crude numbers are extremely low, and the total reoperation rate is not affected.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether unipolar (UHA) or bipolar (BHA) hemiarthroplasty should be the preferred treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF).
AIM OBJECTIVE
We investigated the reoperation rate at 13 years post-fracture after BHA and UHA as treatment of FNF, including a subgroup analysis of individuals who survived 5 years or more, and described the reasons for reoperation after BHA and UHA respectively.
METHODS METHODS
In an observational cohort study on prospectively collected national register data, 16,216 BHA and 22,186 UHA were available for matching. A propensity score for treatment with bipolar HA was estimated using logistic regression. Matching was done using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement. Of the 16,216 BHA patients, 12,280 were matched to a UHA control. A subgroup analysis based on the matched sample excluded individuals who died within 5 years and comprised 3,637 individuals with BHA and 3,537 with UHA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used.
RESULTS RESULTS
In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 92% of the BHA group was free from reoperation at 13 years (95% CI 0.91-0.93), compared to 92% in the UHA group (CI 0.89-0.94). BHA was associated with more reoperations until 3 years. Reoperation due to infection was most common after BHA, n = 212 (1.7%) compared to n = 141 (1.1%) after UHA. Dislocation led to reoperation in 192 of the BHA cases (1.6%) and in 157 of the UHA cases (1.3%). Acetabular erosion/pain occurred in 0.1% and 0.4%. Amongst those surviving ≥ 5 years, 93% of the BHA group was free from reoperation (CI 0.92-0.94) at 13 years, 92% after UHA (CI 0.90-0.94). BHA had more reoperations during the 1st year only. The causes for reoperations showed similar rates except for acetabular erosion/pain. Here the BHA group had 2 cases (0.1%), the UHA had 39 (1.1%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
With a modular hemiarthroplasty relatively few patients need a reoperation. During the first years, there is a higher reoperation rate after BHA compared to UHA. Thereafter, no differences are seen. In patients who survive ≥ 5 years after the fracture there are more reoperations due to acetabular erosion after UHA, but crude numbers are extremely low, and the total reoperation rate is not affected.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38001417
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07035-z
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-07035-z
pmc: PMC10668427
doi:

Types de publication

Observational Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

911

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Sep;134(9):1251-9
pubmed: 25055754
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):401-410
pubmed: 31773262
Int Orthop. 2013 Dec;37(12):2457-64
pubmed: 24122045
Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):503-508
pubmed: 29790397
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):768-74
pubmed: 18555648
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar;37(3):601-608.e1
pubmed: 34915132
Injury. 2020 Mar;51(3):663-669
pubmed: 31987605
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):721-4
pubmed: 26632499
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 3;103(3):195-204
pubmed: 33208595
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2583-9
pubmed: 17142407
Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):459-66
pubmed: 22998529
Int Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1277-82
pubmed: 25557759

Auteurs

Dennis Lind (D)

Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. dennis.lind@med.lu.se.

Jonatan Nåtman (J)

Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Maziar Mohaddes (M)

Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Cecilia Rogmark (C)

Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH