Modeling a Fluid-Coupled Single Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Using the Finite Difference Method.

MEMS PMUT characterization finite difference method lumped-element ultrasound vibrometry

Journal

Micromachines
ISSN: 2072-666X
Titre abrégé: Micromachines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101640903

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 29 09 2023
revised: 02 11 2023
accepted: 09 11 2023
medline: 25 11 2023
pubmed: 25 11 2023
entrez: 25 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A complete model was developed to simulate the behavior of a circular clamped axisymmetric fluid-coupled Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT). Combining Finite Difference and Boundary Element Matrix (FD-BEM), this model is based on the discretization of the partial differential equation used to translate the mechanical behavior of a PMUT. In the model, both the axial and the transverse displacements are preserved in the equation of motion and used to properly define the neutral line position. To introduce fluid coupling, a Green's function dedicated to axisymmetric circular radiating sources is employed. The resolution of the behavioral equations is used to establish the equivalent electroacoustic circuit of a PMUT that preserves the average particular velocity, the mechanical power, and the acoustic power. Particular consideration is given to verifying the validity of certain assumptions that are usually made across various steps of previously reported analytical models. In this framework, the advantages of the membrane discretization performed in the FD-BEM model are highlighted through accurate simulations of the first vibration mode and especially the cutoff frequency that many other models do not predict. This high cutoff frequency corresponds to cases where the spatial average velocity of the plate is null and is of great importance for PMUT design because it defines the upper limit above which the device is considered to be mechanically blocked. These modeling results are compared with electrical and dynamic membrane displacement measurements of AlN-based (500 nm thick) PMUTs in air and fluid. The first resonance frequency confrontation showed a maximum relative error of 1.13% between the FD model and Finite Element Method (FEM). Moreover, the model perfectly predicts displacement amplitudes when PMUT vibrates in a fluid, with less than 5% relative error. Displacement amplitudes of 16 nm and 20 nm were measured for PMUT with 340 µm and 275 µm diameters, respectively. This complete PMUT model using the FD-BEM approach is shown to be very efficient in terms of computation time and accuracy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38004946
pii: mi14112089
doi: 10.3390/mi14112089
pmc: PMC10673182
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021 Mar;68(3):718-733
pubmed: 32746207
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Jan;65(1):50-59
pubmed: 29283347
Ultrasonics. 2004 Apr;42(1-9):465-71
pubmed: 15047330
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jul 26;13(8):9624-34
pubmed: 23896705
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 Apr;62(4):744-65
pubmed: 25881352
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 Sep;62(9):1704-16
pubmed: 26415131
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002 May;49(5):573-84
pubmed: 12046933
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Dec;52(12):2199-210
pubmed: 16463486
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 Oct;54(10):2110-9
pubmed: 18019249
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Apr 03;15(4):8020-41
pubmed: 25855038
Micromachines (Basel). 2019 Feb 23;10(2):
pubmed: 30813447
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012 May;59(5):990-8
pubmed: 22622984
Ultrasonics. 2013 Feb;53(2):328-34
pubmed: 22959848
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;22(15):
pubmed: 35957175
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1998;45(3):678-90
pubmed: 18244219
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;22(23):
pubmed: 36501852
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Sep;65(9):1680-1694
pubmed: 29994333
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 Nov;66(11):1760-1776
pubmed: 31295111
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 May;60(5):1016-24
pubmed: 23661137
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):
pubmed: 36671890
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 14;17(6):
pubmed: 28613242
Micromachines (Basel). 2023 Feb 02;14(2):
pubmed: 36838074
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Mar;63(3):432-47
pubmed: 26863658
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):2549-61
pubmed: 21110553
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2000;47(4):903-15
pubmed: 18238624
Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023 Jul 21;9:95
pubmed: 37484500
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Sep;63(9):1441-1454
pubmed: 27392351
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Aug;60(8):1756-67
pubmed: 25004545

Auteurs

Valentin Goepfert (V)

GREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.
MODULEUS SAS, 37100 Tours, France.

Audren Boulmé (A)

MODULEUS SAS, 37100 Tours, France.

Franck Levassort (F)

GREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.

Tony Merrien (T)

MODULEUS SAS, 37100 Tours, France.

Rémi Rouffaud (R)

GREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.

Dominique Certon (D)

GREMAN UMR7347, CNRS, INSA CVL, University of Tours, 37100 Tours, France.

Classifications MeSH