SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Response in People Living with HIV According to CD4 Count and CD4/CD8 Ratio.
CD4 count
CD4/CD8 ratio
HIV
PLWH
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine
humoral response
Journal
Vaccines
ISSN: 2076-393X
Titre abrégé: Vaccines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101629355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2023
30 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
08
09
2023
revised:
19
10
2023
accepted:
24
10
2023
medline:
25
11
2023
pubmed:
25
11
2023
entrez:
25
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our aim was to estimate the rates of not achieving a robust/above-average humoral response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH) who received ≥2 doses and to investigate the role of the CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio in predicting the humoral response. We evaluated the humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 response 1-month after the second and third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine as a proportion of not achieving a robust/above-average response using two criteria: (i) a humoral threshold identified as a correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 (<90% vaccine efficacy): anti-RBD < 775 BAU/mL or anti-S < 298 BAU/mL, (ii) threshold of binding antibodies equivalent to average neutralization activity from the levels of binding (nAb titer < 1:40): anti-RBD < 870 BAU/mL or anti-S < 1591 BAU/mL. PLWH were stratified according to the CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio at first dose. Logistic regression was used to compare the probability of not achieving robust/above-average responses. A mixed linear model was used to estimate the mean anti-RBD titer at various time points across the exposure groups. a total of 1176 PLWH were included. The proportions of participants failing to achieve a robust/above-average response were significantly higher in participants with a lower CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio, specifically, a clearer gradient was observed for the CD4 count. The CD4 count was a better predictor of the humoral response of the primary cycle than ratio. The third dose was pivotal in achieving a robust/above-average humoral response, at least for PLWH with CD4 > 200 cells/mm A robust humoral response after a booster dose has not been reached by 50% of PLWH with CD4 < 200 cells mm
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Our aim was to estimate the rates of not achieving a robust/above-average humoral response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH) who received ≥2 doses and to investigate the role of the CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio in predicting the humoral response.
METHODS
METHODS
We evaluated the humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 response 1-month after the second and third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine as a proportion of not achieving a robust/above-average response using two criteria: (i) a humoral threshold identified as a correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 (<90% vaccine efficacy): anti-RBD < 775 BAU/mL or anti-S < 298 BAU/mL, (ii) threshold of binding antibodies equivalent to average neutralization activity from the levels of binding (nAb titer < 1:40): anti-RBD < 870 BAU/mL or anti-S < 1591 BAU/mL. PLWH were stratified according to the CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio at first dose. Logistic regression was used to compare the probability of not achieving robust/above-average responses. A mixed linear model was used to estimate the mean anti-RBD titer at various time points across the exposure groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
a total of 1176 PLWH were included. The proportions of participants failing to achieve a robust/above-average response were significantly higher in participants with a lower CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio, specifically, a clearer gradient was observed for the CD4 count. The CD4 count was a better predictor of the humoral response of the primary cycle than ratio. The third dose was pivotal in achieving a robust/above-average humoral response, at least for PLWH with CD4 > 200 cells/mm
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A robust humoral response after a booster dose has not been reached by 50% of PLWH with CD4 < 200 cells mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 38005996
pii: vaccines11111664
doi: 10.3390/vaccines11111664
pmc: PMC10675416
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : European Union's Horizon 2020
ID : 101016167
Références
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 17;13:988304
pubmed: 36325346
PLoS Med. 2022 Oct 27;19(10):e1003979
pubmed: 36301821
J Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 28;226(11):1913-1923
pubmed: 36200261
Lancet HIV. 2020 Aug;7(8):e554-e564
pubmed: 32473657
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 5;12(1):5839
pubmed: 34611163
HIV Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):40-9
pubmed: 24007533
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;11(1):
pubmed: 36679927
Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:141-55
pubmed: 21090961
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e2095-e2106
pubmed: 33095853
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 23;9(4):ofac089
pubmed: 35355894
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 22;13(1):4922
pubmed: 35995780
Nat Aging. 2022 Oct;2(10):896-905
pubmed: 37118289
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1964-e1972
pubmed: 32905581
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 26;13:994173
pubmed: 36091014
Cell. 2020 Jun 25;181(7):1489-1501.e15
pubmed: 32473127
AIDS Rev. 2021 Jun 02;24(1):32-40
pubmed: 34077404
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 15;387(24):2203-2206
pubmed: 36507702
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 17;12(1):5061
pubmed: 34404775
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2023 Apr;20(2):51-75
pubmed: 36680700
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 30;8(7):ofab353
pubmed: 34337100
Vaccine. 2022 Jun 9;40(26):3633-3637
pubmed: 35568588
Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Feb;29(2):381-388
pubmed: 36692375
Immunity. 2021 Sep 14;54(9):2133-2142.e3
pubmed: 34453880
Infection. 2022 Jun;50(3):617-623
pubmed: 34694595
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jan;43:101226
pubmed: 34901799
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
Viruses. 2022 Feb 02;14(2):
pubmed: 35215903
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1784-1786
pubmed: 33720292
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e916-e919
pubmed: 34864962
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e552-e563
pubmed: 35366316
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Nov;28(11):1492-1498
pubmed: 35640840