Association of the affordable care act with racial and ethnic disparities in uninsured emergency department utilization.
Affordable care act
Disparities
Emergency departments
Health care access
Health insurance
Racial/ ethnic
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Nov 2023
25 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
12
12
2022
accepted:
17
10
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
26
11
2023
entrez:
25
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Disparities in uninsured emergency department (ED) use are well documented. However, a comprehensive analysis evaluating how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may have reduced racial and ethnic disparities is lacking. The goal was to assess the association of the ACA with racial and ethnic disparities in uninsured ED use. This study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for Georgia, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York from 2011 to 2017. Participants include non-elderly adults between 18 and 64 years old. Outcomes include uninsured rates of ED visits by racial and ethnic groups and stratified by medical urgency using the New York University ED algorithm. Visits were aggregated to year-quarter ED visits per 100,000 population and stratified for non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic non-elderly adults. Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences and triple differences regression analyses to identify the effect of the ACA and the separate effect of the Medicaid expansion were used comparing uninsured ED visits by race and ethnicity groups pre-post ACA. The ACA was associated with a 14% reduction in the rate of uninsured ED visits per 100,000 population (from 10,258 pre-ACA to 8,877 ED visits per 100,000 population post-ACA) overall. The non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White disparity decreased by 12.4% (-275.1 ED visits per 100,000) post-ACA. About 60% of the decline in the Black-White disparity was attributed to disproportionate declines in ED visit rates for conditions classified as not-emergent (-93.2 ED visits per 100,000), and primary care treatable/preventable (-64.1 ED visits per 100,000), while the disparity in ED visit rates for injuries and not preventable conditions also declined (-106.57 ED visits per 100,000). All reductions in disparities were driven by the Medicaid expansion. No significant decrease in Hispanic-White disparity was observed. The ACA was associated with fewer uninsured ED visits and reduced the Black-White ED disparity, driven mostly by a reduction in less emergent ED visits after the ACA in Medicaid expansion states. Disparities between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White adults did not decline after the ACA. Despite the positive momentum of declining disparities in uninsured ED visits, disparities, especially among Black people, remain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Disparities in uninsured emergency department (ED) use are well documented. However, a comprehensive analysis evaluating how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may have reduced racial and ethnic disparities is lacking. The goal was to assess the association of the ACA with racial and ethnic disparities in uninsured ED use.
METHODS
METHODS
This study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for Georgia, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York from 2011 to 2017. Participants include non-elderly adults between 18 and 64 years old. Outcomes include uninsured rates of ED visits by racial and ethnic groups and stratified by medical urgency using the New York University ED algorithm. Visits were aggregated to year-quarter ED visits per 100,000 population and stratified for non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic non-elderly adults. Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences and triple differences regression analyses to identify the effect of the ACA and the separate effect of the Medicaid expansion were used comparing uninsured ED visits by race and ethnicity groups pre-post ACA.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The ACA was associated with a 14% reduction in the rate of uninsured ED visits per 100,000 population (from 10,258 pre-ACA to 8,877 ED visits per 100,000 population post-ACA) overall. The non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White disparity decreased by 12.4% (-275.1 ED visits per 100,000) post-ACA. About 60% of the decline in the Black-White disparity was attributed to disproportionate declines in ED visit rates for conditions classified as not-emergent (-93.2 ED visits per 100,000), and primary care treatable/preventable (-64.1 ED visits per 100,000), while the disparity in ED visit rates for injuries and not preventable conditions also declined (-106.57 ED visits per 100,000). All reductions in disparities were driven by the Medicaid expansion. No significant decrease in Hispanic-White disparity was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The ACA was associated with fewer uninsured ED visits and reduced the Black-White ED disparity, driven mostly by a reduction in less emergent ED visits after the ACA in Medicaid expansion states. Disparities between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White adults did not decline after the ACA. Despite the positive momentum of declining disparities in uninsured ED visits, disparities, especially among Black people, remain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38007468
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10168-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10168-5
pmc: PMC10676572
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1302Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Mar;(401):1-8
pubmed: 33814037
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2280-2282
pubmed: 32233337
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001 Oct;14(4):339-46
pubmed: 16369643
Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;51(5):1735-71
pubmed: 27265432
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192662
pubmed: 31002327
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jan;42(1):26-34
pubmed: 36623225
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):398-408
pubmed: 15757923
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Feb;76(1):32-55
pubmed: 29148341
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1774-8
pubmed: 26378026
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Dec;36(12):2115-2122
pubmed: 29200330
J Health Econ. 2017 May;53:72-86
pubmed: 28319791
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;29(3):333-45
pubmed: 20825838
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1):24-35
pubmed: 31132912
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Oct;30(10):1822-9
pubmed: 21976322
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55 Suppl 2:841-850
pubmed: 32869303
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1416-21
pubmed: 27196653
Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):140-6
pubmed: 26595227
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1:307-316
pubmed: 30378119
JAMA Surg. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):e175568
pubmed: 29365029
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 May;44(3):405-412
pubmed: 26961781
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216913
pubmed: 35699958
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):944-950
pubmed: 29863941
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):711-718
pubmed: 31828588
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 May;77(5):511-522
pubmed: 33715829
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):859-869
pubmed: 30143994
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1264-1276
pubmed: 28726238
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;77(1):76-81
pubmed: 32854964
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):586-593
pubmed: 28636831
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102541
pubmed: 34700139
Med Sci Monit. 2008 Mar;14(3):SR9-13
pubmed: 18301369
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Nov;10(11):1289-93
pubmed: 14597507
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):654-660
pubmed: 28614177
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 26;:
pubmed: 28747321
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jul 8;3(7):e221874
pubmed: 35977222
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):395-402
pubmed: 32119625
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3640-3656
pubmed: 29468669
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;28(6):666-674
pubmed: 33368833
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):588-590
pubmed: 28241266