Locked Tension Band Wiring: A Modified Technique for Olecranon Fractures-A Multicenter Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Complications with Conventional Methods.
Complication
Implant irritation
Mayo Elbow Performance Index
Modified surgical technique
Olecranon fracture
Tension band wiring
Journal
Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
18
12
2022
accepted:
07
10
2023
pmc-release:
29
10
2024
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
27
11
2023
entrez:
27
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tension band wiring is the standard treatment for olecranon fractures, but it is associated with high rate of implant-related complication. To reduce this high complication rate, we developed a modified technique, locked tension band wiring (LTBW). The aim of this study was to investigate whether LTBW reduces complication and reoperation rates compared to conventional methods (CTBW). We identified 213 olecranon fractures treated with tension band wiring: 183 were treated with CTBW, and 30 were treated with LTBW, and patients in each group were selected using propensity score matching. We evaluated operation time, intraoperative bleeding, complication and reoperation rates, the amount of Kirschner's wire (K-wire) back-out, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Complications included nonunion, loss of fracture reduction, implant failure, infection, neurological impairment, heterotopic ossification, and implant irritation. Implant removal included at the patient's request with no symptoms. We finally investigated 29 patients in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the LTBW (106.7 ± 17.5 vs. 79.7 ± 21.1 min; Our modified TBW significantly increased operation time compared to conventional method, but reduced the complication and removal rate and had equivalent functional outcomes in this retrospective study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38009177
doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01017-y
pii: 1017
pmc: PMC10673746
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2024-2030Informations de copyright
© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestNo benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Références
J Nucl Med. 2002 Mar;43(3):346-53
pubmed: 11884494
Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:175-85
pubmed: 7797857
J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Feb 22;3:9
pubmed: 18294381
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(RR-1):1-20
pubmed: 22237112
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Aug;103(2):155-160
pubmed: 30006804
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1181-6
pubmed: 24875733
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Oct;10(10):863-870
pubmed: 36452422
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 2;99(15):1261-1273
pubmed: 28763412
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1282-1288
pubmed: 32284308
Am J Infect Control. 1992 Oct;20(5):271-4
pubmed: 1332552
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 Sep-Dec;29(3):23094990211059231
pubmed: 34872400
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):2347-2352
pubmed: 32569869
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;27(1):133-139
pubmed: 30206356
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2412-2417
pubmed: 33774170
J Int Med Res. 2012;40(3):1055-66
pubmed: 22906278
Neth J Surg. 1983 Mar;35(1):27-9
pubmed: 6843868
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119(7-8):432-4
pubmed: 10613234
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Apr;28(2):205-213
pubmed: 37120308
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245-51
pubmed: 7722560