UK paediatric speech and language therapists' perceptions on the use of telehealth in current and future clinical practice: An application of the APEASE criteria.
APEASE
child
speech and language therapy
telehealth
Journal
International journal of language & communication disorders
ISSN: 1460-6984
Titre abrégé: Int J Lang Commun Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9803709
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2023
27 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
08
12
2022
accepted:
06
11
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
27
11
2023
entrez:
27
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Telehealth for paediatric speech and language therapy became one of the most salient modes of service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence for speech and language therapy services via telehealth in comparison to face-to-face delivery demonstrates promising outcomes, and studies have begun to explore practitioner and client experiences. However, across the literature, many critical elements of services are overlooked, and there is a need to frame the evidence base within a theoretical model that can draw out practical implications that consider the range of factors having an impact on clinical implementation in real-world contexts. The APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, and Equity) criteria offer such a model. The current study explored practising UK speech and language therapists' (SLTs) clinical experience of telehealth through the lens of the APEASE criteria and aimed to identify recommendations for future service provision from the practitioner perspective. An online survey structured using the APEASE criteria was developed in collaboration with the UK Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four hundred and thirty-eight qualified and practicing UK paediatric SLTs completed the survey. Telehealth was broadly acceptable and practicable to SLTs yet there remains some uncertainty about its efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared to face-to-face interventions and how equitable it is for different population groups. SLTs reported that effective implementation of telehealth services was dependent upon several contextual factors; affordability was a perceived barrier to clients having access to telehealth resources, intervention via telehealth was perceived as more acceptable than assessment, and whilst many SLTs welcomed aspects of telehealth, there were concerns about the physical and mental health consequences for practitioners. Six themes for the future development of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy were identified: (1) balanced and tailored services; (2) technology and equipment; (3) information and communication; (4) capacity building; (5) monitoring and evaluation; and (6) leadership and governance. Outcomes highlight promising, concerning and uncertain aspects of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy. SLTs value a flexible and tailored approach to service delivery and recommend that effective leadership, clear communication, ongoing policy and guidance development, upskilling of users and careful evaluation of impact are required to ensure optimal implementation. The APEASE criteria offer a valuable opportunity to enhance and streamline practice and research to ensure sustainable implementation of telehealth in the paediatric speech and language therapy services of tomorrow. What is already known on this subject The COVID-19 pandemic led to the increased use of telehealth as a main mode of service delivery in paediatric speech and language therapy. Pre-COVID-19, evidence for the use of telehealth in this field included small-scale experimental studies that reported on children with particular disorders and explored telehealth outcomes in comparison to face-to-face delivery. The realities of at-scale clinical practice were not well-represented, and critical elements of service such as cost-effectiveness were often overlooked in the paediatric literature. Furthermore, despite emerging global evidence for temporary telehealth responses to the crisis in speech and language therapy, the long-term and future use of telehealth remains unclear. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The current study applied the lens of the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, and Equity) criteria, which were used in this case to consider socioeconomic, ecological and cultural factors to capture an overarching understanding of the use of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy, and to inform the role of telehealth in future, longer-term and at-scale service development. Results indicated emerging trends in UK paediatric speech and language therapists' (SLTs') perceptions of telehealth and SLTs perceived a hybrid approach to service delivery, combining mostly face-to-face services with some telehealth, was likely to continue in the future. We identified six themes to guide the future development of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy services: (1) balanced and tailored services; (2) technology and equipment; (3) information and communication; (4) capacity building; (5) monitoring and evaluation; and (6) leadership and governance. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? UK SLTs believe that speech and language therapy services using telehealth should be reflective, tailored and flexible to meet the requirements and circumstances of the children, young people and families served, as well as the physical and emotional needs of practitioners. SLTs recommend that this service development is clearly communicated to all stakeholders and suggested that those using telehealth should be supported through appropriate training, and ongoing effectiveness should be monitored. Telehealth is here to stay and the APEASE criteria offer a unique opportunity to ensure sustainable models of service delivery; to support co-ordinated leadership at the local, national and international levels and the development of policy and clinical guidance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Telehealth for paediatric speech and language therapy became one of the most salient modes of service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence for speech and language therapy services via telehealth in comparison to face-to-face delivery demonstrates promising outcomes, and studies have begun to explore practitioner and client experiences. However, across the literature, many critical elements of services are overlooked, and there is a need to frame the evidence base within a theoretical model that can draw out practical implications that consider the range of factors having an impact on clinical implementation in real-world contexts. The APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, and Equity) criteria offer such a model. The current study explored practising UK speech and language therapists' (SLTs) clinical experience of telehealth through the lens of the APEASE criteria and aimed to identify recommendations for future service provision from the practitioner perspective.
METHODS
METHODS
An online survey structured using the APEASE criteria was developed in collaboration with the UK Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four hundred and thirty-eight qualified and practicing UK paediatric SLTs completed the survey. Telehealth was broadly acceptable and practicable to SLTs yet there remains some uncertainty about its efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared to face-to-face interventions and how equitable it is for different population groups. SLTs reported that effective implementation of telehealth services was dependent upon several contextual factors; affordability was a perceived barrier to clients having access to telehealth resources, intervention via telehealth was perceived as more acceptable than assessment, and whilst many SLTs welcomed aspects of telehealth, there were concerns about the physical and mental health consequences for practitioners. Six themes for the future development of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy were identified: (1) balanced and tailored services; (2) technology and equipment; (3) information and communication; (4) capacity building; (5) monitoring and evaluation; and (6) leadership and governance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Outcomes highlight promising, concerning and uncertain aspects of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy. SLTs value a flexible and tailored approach to service delivery and recommend that effective leadership, clear communication, ongoing policy and guidance development, upskilling of users and careful evaluation of impact are required to ensure optimal implementation. The APEASE criteria offer a valuable opportunity to enhance and streamline practice and research to ensure sustainable implementation of telehealth in the paediatric speech and language therapy services of tomorrow.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS
CONCLUSIONS
What is already known on this subject The COVID-19 pandemic led to the increased use of telehealth as a main mode of service delivery in paediatric speech and language therapy. Pre-COVID-19, evidence for the use of telehealth in this field included small-scale experimental studies that reported on children with particular disorders and explored telehealth outcomes in comparison to face-to-face delivery. The realities of at-scale clinical practice were not well-represented, and critical elements of service such as cost-effectiveness were often overlooked in the paediatric literature. Furthermore, despite emerging global evidence for temporary telehealth responses to the crisis in speech and language therapy, the long-term and future use of telehealth remains unclear. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The current study applied the lens of the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, and Equity) criteria, which were used in this case to consider socioeconomic, ecological and cultural factors to capture an overarching understanding of the use of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy, and to inform the role of telehealth in future, longer-term and at-scale service development. Results indicated emerging trends in UK paediatric speech and language therapists' (SLTs') perceptions of telehealth and SLTs perceived a hybrid approach to service delivery, combining mostly face-to-face services with some telehealth, was likely to continue in the future. We identified six themes to guide the future development of telehealth in paediatric speech and language therapy services: (1) balanced and tailored services; (2) technology and equipment; (3) information and communication; (4) capacity building; (5) monitoring and evaluation; and (6) leadership and governance. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? UK SLTs believe that speech and language therapy services using telehealth should be reflective, tailored and flexible to meet the requirements and circumstances of the children, young people and families served, as well as the physical and emotional needs of practitioners. SLTs recommend that this service development is clearly communicated to all stakeholders and suggested that those using telehealth should be supported through appropriate training, and ongoing effectiveness should be monitored. Telehealth is here to stay and the APEASE criteria offer a unique opportunity to ensure sustainable models of service delivery; to support co-ordinated leadership at the local, national and international levels and the development of policy and clinical guidance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38009588
doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12988
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.
Références
Boisvert, M., Lang, R.M., Andrianopoulos, M. & Boscardin, M.L. (2010) Tele-practice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 423-432.
Burns, C.L., Ward, E.C., Hill, A.J., Malcolm, K. & Bassett, L., et al. (2012) A pilot trial of a speech pathology telehealth service for head and neck cancer patients. J Telemed Telecare, 18, 443-446.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022) Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3-26.
Centre for Workforce Intelligence. (2014) Securing the future workforce supply. Speech and language therapy stocktake. Available: SLT stocktake report (hee.nhs.uk) [Accessed 24th May 2023].
Chadd, K., Moyse, K. & Enderby, P. (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on the speech and language therapy profession and their patients. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 1-11.
Cochrane, F., Siyambalapitiya, S. & Cornwell, P. (2018) Speech-language pathology services for Indigenous Australian adults with acquired communication disorders: a systematic quantitative literature review. Speech, Language and Hearing, 23, 1-12.
Edwards, M., Stredler-Brown, A. & Houston, K.T. (2012) Expanding use of tele-practice in speech -language pathology and audiology. Volta Review, 112, 27-242.
Eysenbach, G. (2004) Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 29, 1-6.
Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80-92.
Glueckauf, R.L., Whitton, J.D. & Nickelson, D.W. (2002) Telehealth: the new frontier in rehabilitation and health care. In: Scherer, M. J. (Ed.) Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. American Psychological Association, pp. 197-213.
Grogan-Johnson, S., Schmidt, A.M., Schenker, J., Alvares, R., Rowan, L.E. & Taylor, J.A. (2013) Comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34, 210-220.
Hodge, M.A., Sutherland, R., Jeng, K., Bale, G., Batta, P. et al. (2014) Agreement between telehealth and face-to-face assessment of intellectual ability in children with specific learning disorder. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 25, 431-437.
Keck, C.S. & Doarn, C.R. (2014) Telehealth technology applications in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine Journal and e-health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 20, 653-659.
Kraljević, J.K., Matić, A. & Dokoza, K.P. (2020) Telepractice as a reaction to the COVID-19 crisis: insights from croatian slp settings. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12, 93-104.
Law, J., Charlton, J., Dornstauder, M. & Gréaux, M. (2021) Tele-practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: employing the COM-B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 56, 415-434.
Leone, E., Eddison, N., Healy, A., Royse, C. & Chockalingam, N. (2021) Exploration of implementation, financial and technical considerations within allied health professional (AHP) telehealth consultation guidance: a scoping review including UK AHP professional bodies’ guidance. BMJ Open, 11, 1-16.
Lowe, R., O'brian, S. & Onslow, M. (2013) Review of telehealth for stuttering management folia. Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 65, 223-238.
Mcgill, M., Noureal, N. & Siegel, J. (2019) Tele-practice treatment of stuttering: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25, 359-368.
Michie, S., Atkins, L. & West, R. (2014) The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. London: Silverback Publishing.
Patel, R., Loraine, E. & Gréaux, M. (2022) Impact of COVID-19 on digital practice in UK paediatric speech and language therapy and implications for the future: a national survey. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 57, 1112-1129.
Peh, H.P., Yee, K. & Manatring, E.J.N. (2022) Changes in telepractice use and perspectives among speech and language therapists in Singapore through the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 58, 802-8012.
RCSLT. (2018) Email with 3rd Author, 24 May 2023.
RCSLT. (2021) Email with 3rd Author 24 May 2023.
Rettinger, L., Klupper, C., Werner, F. & Putz, P. (2021) Changing attitudes towards teletherapy in Austrian therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 29, 1-9.
Roberts, K., Dowell, A. & Nie, J.B. (2019) Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 1-8.
Speyer, R., Denman, D., Hons, B., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Chen, Y.W., Bogaardt, H., Kim, J., Heckathorn, D. & Cordierche, R. (2018) Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50, 225-235.
Sutherland, R., Trembath, D., Hodge, A., Drevensek, S., Lee, S., Silove, N. & Roberts, J. (2017) Telehealth language assessments using consumer grade equipment in rural and urban settings: feasible, reliable and well tolerated. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23, 106-115.
Sutherland, R., Trembath, D. & Roberts, J. (2018) Telehealth and autism: a systematic search and review of the literature. International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 20, 324-336.
Thomas, D., Mccabe, P., Ballard, K.J. & Lincoln, M. (2016) Telehealth delivery of Rapid Syllable Transitions (ReST) treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 51, 654-671.
Tucker, J.K. (2012a) Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: quantitative survey results. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 61-72.
Tucker, J.K. (2012b) Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: the qualitative view. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 47-60.
Waite, M.C., Theodoros, D.G., Russell, T.G. & Cahill, L.M. (2010) Internet-based telehealth assessment of language using the CELF-4. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 445-458.
Wales, D., Skinner, L. & Hayman, M. (2017) The efficacy of telehealth-delivered speech and language intervention for primary school-age children: a systematic review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9, 55-70.
Ward, E., Crombie, J., Trickey, M., Hill, A., Theodoros, D. & Russell, T. (2009) Assessment of communication and swallowing post-laryngectomy: a telerehabilitation trial. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 15, 232-237.
World Health Organisation. (2020) Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public. [online] Available: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public [Accessed 18th August 2022].
World Health Organisation. (2016) Global Health Observatory (GHO) data: Telehealth. [online] Available at: https://www.who.int/gho/goe/telehealth/en/ [Accessed 18th August 2022].
WHO-ITU. (2022) Global standard for accessibility of telehealth services. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Telecommunication Union, Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [online] Available: WHO-ITU global standard for accessibility of telehealth services [Accessed 5th June 2023].
Xu, W. & Zammit, K. (2020) Applying thematic analysis to education: a hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal or Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-9.