Coagulopathy Parameters Predictive of Outcomes in Sepsis-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Sub-Analysis of the Two Prospective Multicenter Cohort Studies.


Journal

Shock (Augusta, Ga.)
ISSN: 1540-0514
Titre abrégé: Shock
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9421564

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 27 11 2023
entrez: 27 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although coagulopathy is often observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its clinical impact remains poorly understood. This study aimed to clarify the coagulopathy parameters that are clinically applicable for prognostication and to determine anticoagulant indications in sepsis-induced ARDS. This study enrolled patients with sepsis-derived ARDS from two nationwide multicenter, prospective observational studies. We explored coagulopathy parameters that could predict outcomes in the FORECAST cohort, and the defined coagulopathy criteria were validated in the SPICE-ICU cohort. The correlation between anticoagulant use and outcomes was also evaluated. A total of 181 patients with sepsis-derived ARDS in the FORECAST study and 61 patients in the SPICE-ICU study were included. In a preliminary study, we found the set of PT-INR ≥1.4 and platelets ≤12 × 104/μL, Thrombocytopenia and Elongated Prothrombin time, TEP, coagulopathy as the best coagulopathy parameters, and used for further analysis, of which odds ratio of TEP coagulopathy for in-hospital mortality adjusted for confounding was 3.84 (95% CI, 1.66-8.87; p = 0.005). In the validation cohort, the adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 32.99 (95% CI, 2.60-418.72; p = 0.002). Although patients without TEP coagulopathy showed significant improvements in oxygenation over the first 4 days, patients with TEP coagulopathy showed no significant improvement (ΔPaO2/FiO2 ratio, 24 ± 20 vs. 90 ± 9; p = 0.026). Furthermore, anticoagulant use was significantly correlated with mortality and oxygenation recovery in patients with TEP coagulopathy but not in patients without TEP coagulopathy. TEP coagulopathy is closely associated with better outcomes and responses to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-induced ARDS, and our coagulopathy criteria may be clinically useful.Trial registrationFORECAST study: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000019742. Registration date: November 11th, 2015.SPICE-ICU study: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000027258. Registration date: May 6th, 2017.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although coagulopathy is often observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its clinical impact remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to clarify the coagulopathy parameters that are clinically applicable for prognostication and to determine anticoagulant indications in sepsis-induced ARDS.
METHOD METHODS
This study enrolled patients with sepsis-derived ARDS from two nationwide multicenter, prospective observational studies. We explored coagulopathy parameters that could predict outcomes in the FORECAST cohort, and the defined coagulopathy criteria were validated in the SPICE-ICU cohort. The correlation between anticoagulant use and outcomes was also evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 181 patients with sepsis-derived ARDS in the FORECAST study and 61 patients in the SPICE-ICU study were included. In a preliminary study, we found the set of PT-INR ≥1.4 and platelets ≤12 × 104/μL, Thrombocytopenia and Elongated Prothrombin time, TEP, coagulopathy as the best coagulopathy parameters, and used for further analysis, of which odds ratio of TEP coagulopathy for in-hospital mortality adjusted for confounding was 3.84 (95% CI, 1.66-8.87; p = 0.005). In the validation cohort, the adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 32.99 (95% CI, 2.60-418.72; p = 0.002). Although patients without TEP coagulopathy showed significant improvements in oxygenation over the first 4 days, patients with TEP coagulopathy showed no significant improvement (ΔPaO2/FiO2 ratio, 24 ± 20 vs. 90 ± 9; p = 0.026). Furthermore, anticoagulant use was significantly correlated with mortality and oxygenation recovery in patients with TEP coagulopathy but not in patients without TEP coagulopathy.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
TEP coagulopathy is closely associated with better outcomes and responses to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-induced ARDS, and our coagulopathy criteria may be clinically useful.Trial registrationFORECAST study: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000019742. Registration date: November 11th, 2015.SPICE-ICU study: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000027258. Registration date: May 6th, 2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38010069
doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002269
pii: 00024382-990000000-00326
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by the Shock Society.

Auteurs

Tadashi Matsuoka (T)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

Seitaro Fujishima (S)

Center for Preventive Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Junchi Sasaki (J)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

Daizoh Saitoh (D)

Division of Traumatology, Research Institute, National Defense Medical College, Japan.

Shigeki Kushimoto (S)

Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Hiroshi Ogura (H)

Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Atsushi Shiraishi (A)

Emergency and Trauma Center, Kameda Medical Center, Japan.

Toshihiko Mayumi (T)

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.

Joji Kotani (J)

Division of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Naoshi Takeyama (N)

Advanced Critical Care Center, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Japan.

Ryosuke Tsuruta (R)

Advanced Medical Emergency & Critical Care Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Japan.

Kiyotsugu Takuma (K)

Emergency & Critical Care Center, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Japan.

Norio Yamashita (N)

Department of Emergency & Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Japan.

Shin-Ichiro Shiraishi (SI)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Aizu Chuo Hospital, Japan.

Hiroto Ikeda (H)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Resuscitation Center, Teikyo University School of Medicine.

Yasukazu Shiino (Y)

Department of Acute Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Japan.

Takehiko Tarui (T)

Department of Emergency Medical Care, Kyorin University Faculty Health Sciences, Japan.

Taka-Aki Nakada (TA)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Toru Hifumi (T)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Japan.

Yasuhiro Otomo (Y)

Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Medical Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.

Kohji Okamoto (K)

Department of Surgery, Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Kitakyushu City Yahata Hospital, Japan.

Yuichiro Sakamoto (Y)

Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Japan.

Akiyoshi Hagiwara (A)

Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Japan.

Tomohiko Masuno (T)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Japan.

Masashi Ueyama (M)

Department of Trauma, Critical Care Medicine, and Burn Center, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Chukyo Hospital, Japan.

Satoshi Fujimi (S)

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Japan.

Kazuma Yamakawa (K)

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Japan.

Yutaka Umemura (Y)

Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Classifications MeSH