Cost of Exempting Sole Orphan Drugs From Medicare Negotiation.
Journal
JAMA internal medicine
ISSN: 2168-6114
Titre abrégé: JAMA Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2023
27 Nov 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
27
11
2024
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
27
11
2023
entrez:
27
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) requires Medicare to negotiate prices for some high-spending drugs but exempts drugs approved solely for the treatment of a single rare disease. To estimate Medicare spending and global revenues for drugs that might have been exempt from negotiation from 2012 to 2021. This cross-sectional study analyzed drugs that met the IRA threshold for price negotiation (Medicare spending >$200 million/y) in any year from 2012 to 2021 and had an Orphan Drug Act designation. We stratified drugs into 4 mutually exclusive categories: approved for a single rare disease (sole orphan), approved for multiple rare diseases (multiorphan), initially approved for a rare disease and subsequently approved for a nonrare disease (orphan first), and initially approved for a nonrare disease and subsequently approved for a rare disease (non-orphan first). The primary outcomes were the number of sole orphan drugs, estimated Medicare spending on those drugs from 2012 to 2021, and global revenue since launch. Among 282 drugs, 95 (34%) were approved to treat at least 1 rare disease, including 25 sole orphan drugs (26%), 20 multiorphan drugs (21%), 13 orphan first drugs (14%), and 37 non-orphan first drugs (39%). From 2012 to 2021, Medicare spending on sole orphan drugs increased from $3.4 billion to $10.0 billion. Each year, a median (IQR) of $2.5 ($1.9-$2.6) billion in Medicare spending would have been excluded from price negotiation because of the sole orphan exemption. The cumulative global revenue of the median (IQR) sole orphan drug was $11 ($6.6-$19.2) billion. The sole orphan exemption will exclude billions of dollars of Medicare drug spending from price negotiation. The high level of global revenues achieved by these drugs, however, suggests that special exemption is unnecessary for them to achieve financial success. Congress could consider removing the sole orphan exemption to obtain additional savings for patients and taxpayers and to eliminate any potential disincentive for developing additional indications for these drugs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38010643
pii: 2811802
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6293
pmc: PMC10682941
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2022 Mar 1;9(11-12):265-272
pubmed: 35548705
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Oct;38(10):1115-1121
pubmed: 32533523
J Health Econ. 2009 Sep;28(5):950-62
pubmed: 19671480
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 4;363(19):1855-62
pubmed: 21047231
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):453-460
pubmed: 33646878
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1243-1269
pubmed: 34368939
Food Drug Law J. 2000;55(1):125-43
pubmed: 12322720
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4125-4131
pubmed: 27863194
J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Oct;11(14):999-1010
pubmed: 35946484
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Nov;6(9):589-98
pubmed: 24991385
JAMA. 2023 May 9;329(18):1607-1608
pubmed: 37159041
JAMA. 2020 Mar 03;323(9):844-853
pubmed: 32125404
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):106-108
pubmed: 31291512
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Feb;109(2):367-371
pubmed: 32654122
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):183
pubmed: 30348193