Diverse macrophage populations contribute to distinct manifestations of human cutaneous graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major life-threatening complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), limiting the broad application of HSCT for haematological malignancies. Cutaneous GvHD is described as a post-transplant inflammatory reaction by skin-infiltrating donor T cells and remaining recipient tissue-resident memory T cells. Despite the major influence of lymphocytes on GvHD pathogenesis, the complex role of mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs) in tissues affected by GvHD is increasingly appreciated.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the identity, origin and functions of MNPs in patients with acute cutaneous GvHD.

METHODS

Using single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex tissue immunofluorescence, we identified an increased abundance of MNPs in skin and blood from 36 patients with acute cutaneous GvHD. In cases of sex-mismatched transplantation, we used expression of X-linked genes to detect rapid tissue adaptation of newly recruited donor MNPs resulting in similar transcriptional states of host- and donor-derived macrophages within GvHD skin lesions.

RESULTS

We showed that cutaneous GvHD lesions harbour expanded CD163+ tissue-resident macrophage populations with anti-inflammatory and tissue-remodelling properties including interleukin-10 cytokine production. Cell-cell interaction analyses revealed putative signalling to strengthen regulatory T-cell responses. Notably, macrophage polarization in chronic cutaneous GvHD types was proinflammatory and drastically differed from acute GvHD, supporting the notion of distinct cellular players in different clinical GvHD subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our data reveal a surprisingly dynamic role of MNPs after HSCT. Specific and time-resolved targeting to repolarize this cell subset may present a promising therapeutic strategy in combatting GvHD skin inflammation.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.