Using genetic comparisons of populations from Arizona, Mexico, and Texas to investigate fall armyworm migration in the American southwest.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 04 2023
accepted: 10 07 2023
medline: 29 11 2023
pubmed: 27 11 2023
entrez: 27 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fall armyworm (FAW) is a global agricultural pest, causing substantial economic losses in corn and many other crops. Complicating efforts to control this pest is its capacity for long distance flights, which has been described in greatest detail for the central and eastern sections of the United States. FAW infestations are also routinely found in agricultural areas in southern Arizona, which lie beyond the western limits of the mapped migratory pathways. Climate suitability analysis found that the affected Arizona locations cannot support permanent FAW populations, indicating that these FAW most likely arise from annual migrations. A better understanding of this migration would provide insights into how large moth populations can move across desert habitats as well as the degree of gene flow occurring between FAW populations across the North American continent. In this study the Arizona populations were genetically characterized and compared to a selection of permanent and migratory FAW from multiple sites in the United States and Mexico. The results are consistent with migratory contributions from permanent populations in the states of Texas (United States) and Sinaloa (Mexico), while also providing evidence of significant barriers to gene flow between populations within Mexico. An unexpected finding was that two genetically distinct FAW subpopulations known as "host strains" have a differential distribution in the southwest that may indicate significant differences in their migration behavior in this region. These findings indicate that the combination of mitochondrial and Z-linked markers have advantages in comparing FAW populations that can complement and extend the findings from other methods.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38011106
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289060
pii: PONE-D-23-09901
pmc: PMC10681194
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0289060

Informations de copyright

Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Insect Sci. 2007;7:5
pubmed: 20334595
J Econ Entomol. 2008 Jun;101(3):742-9
pubmed: 18613574
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Oct;108(5):2305-15
pubmed: 26453719
Science. 2006 Aug 11;313(5788):794-6
pubmed: 16902129
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 11;17(11):e0277510
pubmed: 36367889
Int J Biometeorol. 2016 Feb;60(2):255-67
pubmed: 26045330
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):1421
pubmed: 31996745
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):539
pubmed: 35017586
Insect Sci. 2022 Apr;29(2):505-520
pubmed: 34050604
Ecol Lett. 2015 Mar;18(3):287-302
pubmed: 25611117
Insects. 2023 Jan 26;14(2):
pubmed: 36835696
BMC Genomics. 2021 Mar 12;22(1):179
pubmed: 33711916
J Econ Entomol. 2007 Jun;100(3):954-61
pubmed: 17598561
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Feb;76(2):454-463
pubmed: 31237729
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 18;18(4):e0284587
pubmed: 37071644
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0236759
pubmed: 32745105
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Feb;108(1):135-44
pubmed: 26470113
J Econ Entomol. 2022 Dec 14;115(6):1729-1743
pubmed: 36515110
Integr Comp Biol. 2008 Jul;48(1):99-106
pubmed: 21669776
PeerJ. 2021 Sep 24;9:e12195
pubmed: 34631319
Environ Entomol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1546-54
pubmed: 20021748
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Feb 9;111(1):120-126
pubmed: 29267899
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Feb;31:123-130
pubmed: 31109665
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
pubmed: 3447015
J Econ Entomol. 2012 Apr;105(2):573-82
pubmed: 22606829
Insects. 2022 Oct 16;13(10):
pubmed: 36292883
Ecol Evol. 2012 Jul;2(7):1458-67
pubmed: 22957154
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 5;9(1):8311
pubmed: 31165759
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Dec 5;110(6):2568-2575
pubmed: 29126215
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 27;11(10):e0165632
pubmed: 27788251
Insect Mol Biol. 2016 Jun;25(3):324-37
pubmed: 26991678

Auteurs

Rodney N Nagoshi (RN)

Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.

Ashley E Tessnow (AE)

Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Yves Carrière (Y)

Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.

Jeff Bradshaw (J)

Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.

Kyle Harrington (K)

Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.

Gregory A Sword (GA)

Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Robert L Meagher (RL)

Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH