Angioplasty Guidewire-Assisted vs. Conventional Transseptal Puncture for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Angioplasty guidewire Atrial fibrillation Left atrial appendage occlusion Transseptal puncture

Journal

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 11 08 2023
accepted: 02 11 2023
pubmed: 27 11 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
entrez: 27 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study was performed to compare the usability, efficiency, and safety of a modified angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture (TSP) technique vs. the conventional approach in facilitating access into the left atrium during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The ADVANCE-LAAO trial (Angioplasty Guidewire-Assisted vs. Conventional Transseptal Puncture for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion) was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (NCT05125159). Patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO were prospectively enrolled from four centres and randomly assigned to an angioplasty guidewire-assisted TSP group (n = 131) or to a conventional Brockenbrough needle TSP group (n = 132). The primary endpoint was the one-time success rate of TSP. We also analysed the TSP procedure time, failure rate of the assigned TSP type, radiation dose, contrast dose, and procedural complications in both groups. All patients in the guidewire-assisted group underwent successful TSP, whereas five in the standard conventional group switched to the guidewire-assisted approach. The guidewire-assisted puncture improved the one-time success rate (92.4 vs. 77.3%, P = 0.001), shortened the TSP procedure time (109.2 ± 48.2 vs. 120.5 ± 57.6 s, P = 0.023), and tended to have a higher rate of good coaxial orientation of the sheath with the left atrial appendage during the LAAO procedure (66.4 vs. 54.5%, P = 0.059). No TSP-related complications occurred in the guidewire-assisted TSP group, whereas two complications occurred in the conventional TSP group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of the assigned TSP type, the total procedure time, the total radiation dose, the rate of successful LAAO implantation, or the procedural complication rate between the two groups (all P > 0.05). This study confirmed that angioplasty guidewire-assisted puncture can effectively improve the success rate of TSP during LAAO procedures. This novel technique has high potential for application in interventional therapies requiring TSP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38011331
pii: 7451232
doi: 10.1093/europace/euad349
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
ID : SHSMU-ZDCX20210700
Organisme : Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
ID : 22DZ2292400

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Auteurs

Feng Hu (F)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Bin Xu (B)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Zhiqing Qiao (Z)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Fuyu Cheng (F)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Zien Zhou (Z)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Zhiguo Zou (Z)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Minhua Zang (M)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Song Ding (S)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Jun Hong (J)

Department of Cardiology, Ningbo Hangzhou Bay Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Yuquan Xie (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
Department of Cardiology, Ningbo Hangzhou Bay Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Yong Zhou (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
Department of Cardiology, Punan Hospital, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China.

JianFeng Huang (J)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.
Department of Cardiology, Dachang Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China.

Jun Pu (J)

Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160# PuJian Road, Shanghai 200127, China.

Classifications MeSH