Essential content for teaching implementation practice in healthcare: a mixed-methods study of teams offering capacity-building initiatives.
Capacity-building initiatives
Implementation practice
Mixed-methods
Training content and curriculum
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2023
27 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
24
07
2023
accepted:
02
11
2023
medline:
28
11
2023
pubmed:
28
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Applying the knowledge gained through implementation science can support the uptake of research evidence into practice; however, those doing and supporting implementation (implementation practitioners) may face barriers to applying implementation science in their work. One strategy to enhance individuals' and teams' ability to apply implementation science in practice is through training and professional development opportunities (capacity-building initiatives). Although there is an increasing demand for and offerings of implementation practice capacity-building initiatives, there is no universal agreement on what content should be included. In this study we aimed to explore what capacity-building developers and deliverers identify as essential training content for teaching implementation practice. We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study with participants who had developed and/or delivered a capacity-building initiative focused on teaching implementation practice. Participants completed an online questionnaire to provide details on their capacity-building initiatives; took part in an interview or focus group to explore their questionnaire responses in depth; and offered course materials for review. We analyzed a subset of data that focused on the capacity-building initiatives' content and curriculum. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and conventional content analysis for qualitative data, with the data sets merged during the analytic phase. We presented frequency counts for each category to highlight commonalities and differences across capacity-building initiatives. Thirty-three individuals representing 20 capacity-building initiatives participated. Study participants identified several core content areas included in their capacity-building initiatives: (1) taking a process approach to implementation; (2) identifying and applying implementation theories, models, frameworks, and approaches; (3) learning implementation steps and skills; (4) developing relational skills. In addition, study participants described offering applied and pragmatic content (e.g., tools and resources), and tailoring and evolving the capacity-building initiative content to address emerging trends in implementation science. Study participants highlighted some challenges learners face when acquiring and applying implementation practice knowledge and skills. This study synthesized what experienced capacity-building initiative developers and deliverers identify as essential content for teaching implementation practice. These findings can inform the development, refinement, and delivery of capacity-building initiatives, as well as future research directions, to enhance the translation of implementation science into practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Applying the knowledge gained through implementation science can support the uptake of research evidence into practice; however, those doing and supporting implementation (implementation practitioners) may face barriers to applying implementation science in their work. One strategy to enhance individuals' and teams' ability to apply implementation science in practice is through training and professional development opportunities (capacity-building initiatives). Although there is an increasing demand for and offerings of implementation practice capacity-building initiatives, there is no universal agreement on what content should be included. In this study we aimed to explore what capacity-building developers and deliverers identify as essential training content for teaching implementation practice.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study with participants who had developed and/or delivered a capacity-building initiative focused on teaching implementation practice. Participants completed an online questionnaire to provide details on their capacity-building initiatives; took part in an interview or focus group to explore their questionnaire responses in depth; and offered course materials for review. We analyzed a subset of data that focused on the capacity-building initiatives' content and curriculum. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and conventional content analysis for qualitative data, with the data sets merged during the analytic phase. We presented frequency counts for each category to highlight commonalities and differences across capacity-building initiatives.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty-three individuals representing 20 capacity-building initiatives participated. Study participants identified several core content areas included in their capacity-building initiatives: (1) taking a process approach to implementation; (2) identifying and applying implementation theories, models, frameworks, and approaches; (3) learning implementation steps and skills; (4) developing relational skills. In addition, study participants described offering applied and pragmatic content (e.g., tools and resources), and tailoring and evolving the capacity-building initiative content to address emerging trends in implementation science. Study participants highlighted some challenges learners face when acquiring and applying implementation practice knowledge and skills.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study synthesized what experienced capacity-building initiative developers and deliverers identify as essential content for teaching implementation practice. These findings can inform the development, refinement, and delivery of capacity-building initiatives, as well as future research directions, to enhance the translation of implementation science into practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38012798
doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00525-0
pii: 10.1186/s43058-023-00525-0
pmc: PMC10680357
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
151Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN# 143237
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
Pays : Canada
Investigateurs
Sally Bennett
(S)
Agnes T Black
(AT)
Ashley E Cameron
(AE)
Rachel Davis
(R)
Shauna Kingsnorth
(S)
Julia E Moore
(JE)
Christine Provvidenza
(C)
Sharon E Straus
(SE)
Ashleigh Townley
(A)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):830
pubmed: 35761251
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):92-8
pubmed: 18416914
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Jul 06;3(2):1165
pubmed: 26290892
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24
pubmed: 16557505
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):212
pubmed: 35927615
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:307-23
pubmed: 25581153
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 1;16(1):257
pubmed: 27716230
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):881-921
pubmed: 37186312
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158
pubmed: 31275915
Front Health Serv. 2023 Apr 13;3:1139788
pubmed: 37125222
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 28;2(1):84
pubmed: 34321107
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):857
pubmed: 30428882
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):428-44
pubmed: 22618024
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Nov 6;:
pubmed: 37939744
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663
pubmed: 33129763
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28
pubmed: 33740999
J Allied Health. 2020 Winter;49(4):258-262
pubmed: 33259570
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 5;14(1):1
pubmed: 30611302
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
J Community Psychol. 2021 Jul;49(5):1228-1248
pubmed: 33778968
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 30;15(1):97
pubmed: 33126909
Implement Sci. 2008 Jan 07;3:1
pubmed: 18179688
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 20;14(1):66
pubmed: 31221201
Implement Sci. 2019 May 9;14(1):50
pubmed: 31072409
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:136
pubmed: 26416302
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):169
pubmed: 32590940
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 7;19(1):287
pubmed: 31064362
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:1-22
pubmed: 28384085
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 30;16(1):63
pubmed: 29706132
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 3;15(1):54
pubmed: 32620129
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 01;20(1):368
pubmed: 32357877
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20
pubmed: 22179294
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 05;5(1):e147
pubmed: 34527287
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):876-84
pubmed: 22543475
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:92-102
pubmed: 29660481
Implement Sci. 2018 Apr 25;13(1):63
pubmed: 29695267
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 27;16(1):145
pubmed: 27788671
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 02;8:117
pubmed: 24088228
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679
pubmed: 34344699
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75
pubmed: 36309746
Front Health Serv. 2023 Feb 17;3:1103997
pubmed: 36926495
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jun;14(3):175-182
pubmed: 28632931
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):624-635
pubmed: 27142266
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Oct;16(5):332-334
pubmed: 31603625
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58
pubmed: 31171014
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):110
pubmed: 28865479
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 23;8:35
pubmed: 23522377
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 15;9:166
pubmed: 25398428
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;28(6):991-1002
pubmed: 34268832
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81
pubmed: 18302018
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):479-493
pubmed: 29851092
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0131712
pubmed: 26110842
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7
pubmed: 10474547
Med Care. 1996 Sep;34(9):873-89
pubmed: 8792778
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Feb 08;6(5):299-300
pubmed: 28812820
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Dec 25;3:26334895221146261
pubmed: 37091073
Implement Sci. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):106
pubmed: 30081921
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1118-24
pubmed: 24872341
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):445-59
pubmed: 22538406
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2017 Oct-Dec;38(4):392-406
pubmed: 27775487
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Mar;26(1):19-35
pubmed: 32372393
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:331-353
pubmed: 34982585
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 May 14;20(1):91
pubmed: 32408909
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Front Health Serv. 2023 Mar 23;3:1168559
pubmed: 37033898
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):558
pubmed: 34098952
Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Jun;36(2):89-103
pubmed: 15369167
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Nov 29;20(1):3-9
pubmed: 34845166
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 22;13(1):143
pubmed: 30466450
J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Jul;46(4):614-631
pubmed: 35262473
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56
pubmed: 24279835
Implement Sci. 2022 Aug 13;17(1):55
pubmed: 35964095
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):793-802
pubmed: 25130323
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):462-80
pubmed: 22644083