Trueness, Precision, Time-Efficiency and Cost Analysis of Chairside Additive and Subtractive versus Lab-Based Workflows for the Manufacture of Single Crowns: an in Vitro Study.

Additive Technology Chairside Cost-Analysis Dental Laboratory Precision Single Crowns Subtractive Technology Time-Efficiency Trueness

Journal

Journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1879-176X
Titre abrégé: J Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0354422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 08 11 2023
revised: 21 11 2023
accepted: 23 11 2023
medline: 28 11 2023
pubmed: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the trueness, precision, time efficiency, and cost of three different workflows for manufacturing single crowns (SCs). A plaster model with a prepared tooth (#15) was scanned with an industrial scanner, and an SC was designed in computer-assisted-design (CAD) software. Ten SCs were printed with a hybrid composite (additive chairside) and a stereolithographic (SLA) printer (Dfab®), 10 SCs were milled in lithium disilicate (subtractive chairside) using a chairside milling unit (inLab MC XL®), and 10 SCs were milled in zirconia (lab-based) using a five-axis laboratory machine (DWX-52D®). All SCs were scanned with the same scanner after polymerization/sinterization. Each scan was superimposed to the marginal area of the original CAD file to evaluate trueness: absolute average (ABS AVG), root mean square (RMS), and (90˚-10˚)/2 percentile were calculated for each group. Marginal adaptation and quality of the occlusal and interproximal contact points were also investigated by two prosthodontists on 3D printed and plaster models. Finally, the three workflows' time efficiency and costs were evaluated. Additive chairside and subtractive lab-based SCs had significantly better marginal trueness than subtractive chairside SCs in all three parameters (ABS AVG, p < 0.01; RMS, p < 0.01; [90˚-10˚]/2, p < 0.01). However, the two prosthodontists found no significant differences between the three manufacturing procedures in the quality of the marginal closure (p = 0.186), interproximal (p = 0.319), and occlusal contacts (p = 0.218). Both time efficiency and cost show a trend favoring the chairside additive workflow. Chairside additive technology seems to represent a valid alternative for manufacturing definitive SCs, given the high marginal trueness, precision, workflow efficiency and low costs. Additive chairside manufacturing of definitive hybrid composite SCs is now possible and shows high accuracy, time efficiency, and competitive cost.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38013004
pii: S0300-5712(23)00378-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104792
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104792

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest related to this work. No grants, funding nor financial support was obtained for the preparation of the present study.

Auteurs

Francesco Guido Mangano (FG)

Department of Pediatric, Preventive Dentistry and Orthodontics, Sechenov First State Medical University, Moscow, Russia;. Electronic address: francescoguidomangano@gmail.com.

Dario Cianci (D)

Private Practice, Zelo Buon Persico (LO) Italy;. Electronic address: dario.cianci@gmail.com.

Nicola Pranno (N)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy;. Electronic address: nicola.pranno@uniroma1.it.

Henriette Lerner (H)

Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany;. Electronic address: h-lerner@web.de.

Fernando Zarone (F)

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy;. Electronic address: zarone@unina.it.

Oleg Admakin (O)

Department of Pediatric, Preventive Dentistry and Orthodontics, Sechenov First State Medical University, Moscow, Russia;. Electronic address: admakin1966@mail.ru.

Classifications MeSH