COVID-19 pandemic and capital markets: the role of government responses.

Behavioral finance COVID-19 Capital market Government policies Investor sentiment Sales revenue

Journal

Journal of business economics
ISSN: 1861-8928
Titre abrégé: J Bus Econ
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918680586406676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
accepted: 07 06 2022
medline: 28 11 2023
pubmed: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper analyzes the moderation effect of government responses on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, proxied by the daily growth in COVID-19 cases and deaths, on the capital market, i.e., the S&P 500 firm's daily returns. Using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, we monitor 16 daily indicators for government actions across the fields of containment and closure, economic support, and health for 180 countries in the period from January 1, 2020 to March 15, 2021. We find that government responses mitigate the negative stock market impact and that investors' sentiment is sensitive to a firm's country-specific revenue exposure to COVID-19. Our findings indicate that the mitigation effect is stronger for firms that are highly exposed to COVID-19 on the sales side. In more detail, containment and closure policies and economic support mitigate negative stock market impacts, while health system policies support further declines. For firms with high revenue exposure to COVID-19, the mitigation effect is stronger for government economic support and health system initiatives. Containment and closure policies do not mitigate stock price declines due to growing COVID-19 case numbers. Our results hold even after estimating the spread of the pandemic with an epidemiological standard model, namely, the susceptible-infectious-recovered model.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38013855
doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01103-x
pii: 1103
pmc: PMC9261242
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

11-57

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Références

Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:708537
pubmed: 34354650
J R Soc Interface. 2012 Aug 7;9(73):1797-808
pubmed: 22337627
Adv Dis Control Prev. 2017;2(1):1-7
pubmed: 28845481
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101512
pubmed: 32562472
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538
pubmed: 33686204
J Behav Exp Finance. 2021 Mar;29:100428
pubmed: 33269212
J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100341
pubmed: 32427215
J Bus Finance Account. 2021 Mar-Apr;48(3-4):433-462
pubmed: 34230747
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101716
pubmed: 32837385
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101597
pubmed: 32550842
Infect Dis Model. 2020 Jan 08;5:129-141
pubmed: 31956741
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101528
pubmed: 32837360
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Oct;57:101419
pubmed: 34744246
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 18;17(8):
pubmed: 32325710
J financ econ. 2021 Aug;141(2):802-830
pubmed: 34580557
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101671
pubmed: 32837375
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101838
pubmed: 36569651

Auteurs

Christian Beer (C)

TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Janine Maniora (J)

Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Christiane Pott (C)

TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Classifications MeSH