Typology of civic identity.
civic identity
community of citizens
dimensions of identity
game interaction
role of citizen
state
Journal
Current issues in personality psychology
ISSN: 2353-561X
Titre abrégé: Curr Issues Personal Psychol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101694413
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
10
01
2022
revised:
03
03
2022
accepted:
29
04
2022
medline:
28
11
2023
pubmed:
28
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Civic identity is considered a kind of organizational identity, which is a value-semantic experience of the individual's identity with themself as a citizen of the state. It is manifested in the institutional, community, and individual dimensions. Each of the mentioned dimensions of civic identity can be differently developed (actualized) in a particular individual, which suggests the existence of certain types of civic identity. The article aims to empirically verify the typology of the civic identity of an individual and identify both the most common and least common types among Ukrainian citizens. The study involved 965 citizens of Ukraine aged 16-60, of whom 377 were men (39.1%) and 588 women (60.9%). To assess the dimensions of civic identity and establish the development degree of each of them, the author's questionnaire "Diagnosis of maturity and type of civic identity" was used. The existence of 8 main types of civic identity inherent in Ukrainians has been empirically established, namely Institutional-community (17%), Latent (16%), Game (16%), Community-game (15%), Institutional-game (12%), Community (11%), Versatile (8%), and Institutional (5%). Most citizens of Ukraine tend to engage in game interaction with the state, which is dominated by subject-object paradigms. The orientation of the game interaction with the state is also societal, which indicates that games and scenarios are borrowed from others and conditioned mainly by conformity rather than conscious choice. The prevalence of the Latent (indeterminate) type of civic identity coincides with the study subjects' relatively low level of civic identity maturity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Civic identity is considered a kind of organizational identity, which is a value-semantic experience of the individual's identity with themself as a citizen of the state. It is manifested in the institutional, community, and individual dimensions. Each of the mentioned dimensions of civic identity can be differently developed (actualized) in a particular individual, which suggests the existence of certain types of civic identity. The article aims to empirically verify the typology of the civic identity of an individual and identify both the most common and least common types among Ukrainian citizens.
PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE
METHODS
The study involved 965 citizens of Ukraine aged 16-60, of whom 377 were men (39.1%) and 588 women (60.9%). To assess the dimensions of civic identity and establish the development degree of each of them, the author's questionnaire "Diagnosis of maturity and type of civic identity" was used.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The existence of 8 main types of civic identity inherent in Ukrainians has been empirically established, namely Institutional-community (17%), Latent (16%), Game (16%), Community-game (15%), Institutional-game (12%), Community (11%), Versatile (8%), and Institutional (5%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Most citizens of Ukraine tend to engage in game interaction with the state, which is dominated by subject-object paradigms. The orientation of the game interaction with the state is also societal, which indicates that games and scenarios are borrowed from others and conditioned mainly by conformity rather than conscious choice. The prevalence of the Latent (indeterminate) type of civic identity coincides with the study subjects' relatively low level of civic identity maturity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38013935
doi: 10.5114/cipp.2022.116324
pii: 149597
pmc: PMC10654344
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
150-161Informations de copyright
Copyright © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk.
Références
Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;49(Pt 2):305-20
pubmed: 19558752
Educ Citizsh Soc Justice. 2013 Mar 1;8(1):43-57
pubmed: 24847376