Typology of civic identity.

civic identity community of citizens dimensions of identity game interaction role of citizen state

Journal

Current issues in personality psychology
ISSN: 2353-561X
Titre abrégé: Curr Issues Personal Psychol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101694413

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 10 01 2022
revised: 03 03 2022
accepted: 29 04 2022
medline: 28 11 2023
pubmed: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Civic identity is considered a kind of organizational identity, which is a value-semantic experience of the individual's identity with themself as a citizen of the state. It is manifested in the institutional, community, and individual dimensions. Each of the mentioned dimensions of civic identity can be differently developed (actualized) in a particular individual, which suggests the existence of certain types of civic identity. The article aims to empirically verify the typology of the civic identity of an individual and identify both the most common and least common types among Ukrainian citizens. The study involved 965 citizens of Ukraine aged 16-60, of whom 377 were men (39.1%) and 588 women (60.9%). To assess the dimensions of civic identity and establish the development degree of each of them, the author's questionnaire "Diagnosis of maturity and type of civic identity" was used. The existence of 8 main types of civic identity inherent in Ukrainians has been empirically established, namely Institutional-community (17%), Latent (16%), Game (16%), Community-game (15%), Institutional-game (12%), Community (11%), Versatile (8%), and Institutional (5%). Most citizens of Ukraine tend to engage in game interaction with the state, which is dominated by subject-object paradigms. The orientation of the game interaction with the state is also societal, which indicates that games and scenarios are borrowed from others and conditioned mainly by conformity rather than conscious choice. The prevalence of the Latent (indeterminate) type of civic identity coincides with the study subjects' relatively low level of civic identity maturity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Civic identity is considered a kind of organizational identity, which is a value-semantic experience of the individual's identity with themself as a citizen of the state. It is manifested in the institutional, community, and individual dimensions. Each of the mentioned dimensions of civic identity can be differently developed (actualized) in a particular individual, which suggests the existence of certain types of civic identity. The article aims to empirically verify the typology of the civic identity of an individual and identify both the most common and least common types among Ukrainian citizens.
PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE METHODS
The study involved 965 citizens of Ukraine aged 16-60, of whom 377 were men (39.1%) and 588 women (60.9%). To assess the dimensions of civic identity and establish the development degree of each of them, the author's questionnaire "Diagnosis of maturity and type of civic identity" was used.
RESULTS RESULTS
The existence of 8 main types of civic identity inherent in Ukrainians has been empirically established, namely Institutional-community (17%), Latent (16%), Game (16%), Community-game (15%), Institutional-game (12%), Community (11%), Versatile (8%), and Institutional (5%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Most citizens of Ukraine tend to engage in game interaction with the state, which is dominated by subject-object paradigms. The orientation of the game interaction with the state is also societal, which indicates that games and scenarios are borrowed from others and conditioned mainly by conformity rather than conscious choice. The prevalence of the Latent (indeterminate) type of civic identity coincides with the study subjects' relatively low level of civic identity maturity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38013935
doi: 10.5114/cipp.2022.116324
pii: 149597
pmc: PMC10654344
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

150-161

Informations de copyright

Copyright © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk.

Références

Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;49(Pt 2):305-20
pubmed: 19558752
Educ Citizsh Soc Justice. 2013 Mar 1;8(1):43-57
pubmed: 24847376

Auteurs

Inha Petrovska (I)

Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.

Classifications MeSH