The prognostic value of tumor-stroma ratio and a newly developed computer-aided quantitative analysis of routine H&E slides in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.


Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Nov 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 28 11 2023
medline: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) is prognostic in multiple cancers, while its role in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains unclear. Despite the prognostic insight gained from genetic profiles and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), the prognostic use of histology slides remains limited, while it enables the identification of tumor characteristics via computational pathology reducing scoring time and costs. To address this, this study aimed to assess TSR's prognostic role in HGSOC and its association with TILs. We additionally developed an algorithm, Ovarian-TSR (OTSR), using deep learning for TSR scoring, comparing it to manual scoring. 340 patients with advanced-stage who underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with interval debulking (IDS). TSR was assessed in both the most invasive (MI) and whole tumor (WT) regions through manual scoring by pathologists and quantification using OTSR. Patients were categorized as stroma-rich (≥ 50% stroma) or stroma-poor (< 50%). TILs were evaluated via immunohistochemical staining. In PDS, stroma-rich tumors were significantly associated with a more frequent papillary growth pattern (60% vs 34%), while In NACT stroma-rich tumors had a lower Tumor Regression Grading (TRG 4&5, 21% vs 57%) and increased pleural metastasis (25% vs 16%). Stroma-rich patients had significantly shorter overall and progression-free survival compared to stroma-poor (31 versus 45 months; P < 0.0001, and 15 versus 17 months; P = 0.0008, respectively). Combining stromal percentage and TILs led to three distinct survival groups with good (stroma-poor, high TIL), medium (stroma-rich, high TIL, or; stroma-poor, Low TIL), and poor(stroma-rich, low TIL) survival. These survival groups remained significant in CD8 and CD103 in multivariable analysis (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% Confidence-interval (CI) = 1.02-1.99; HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.01-2.18, and HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.05-2.08; HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.55-3.23, respectively). OTSR was able to recapitulate these results and demonstrated high concordance with expert pathologists (correlation = 0.83). TSR is an independent prognostic factor for survival assessment in HGSOC. Stroma-rich tumors have a worse prognosis and, in the case of NACT, a higher likelihood of pleural metastasis. OTSR provides a cost and time-efficient way of determining TSR with high reproducibility and reduced inter-observer variability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38014112
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3511087/v1
pmc: PMC10680933
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK118431
Pays : United States
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : R01 LM013864
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : U01 DK133090
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA248226
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA239055
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: GS reports institutional research support from Agendia, AstraZeneca, Biovica, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Seagen. HMH reports an advisory role for Roche with financial compensation paid to the institute. KVdV reports an advisory role for AstraZeneca, GSK, Owkin, and Exact Sciences, with financial compensation paid to the institute. AJ reports advisory roles for Roche, Merck, and Lunaphore. All other authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Références

Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):651-657
pubmed: 27864219
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 17;5:16317
pubmed: 26573438
Trends Cell Biol. 2013 Dec;23(12):593-602
pubmed: 24074947
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 18;7(42):68954-68965
pubmed: 27661111
Protein Cell. 2018 Aug;9(8):674-692
pubmed: 28929459
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 02;14(23):
pubmed: 36497449
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5198-208
pubmed: 18698038
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 11;13(1):835
pubmed: 35149709
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):644-651
pubmed: 24458470
Acta Clin Croat. ;56(1):73-79
pubmed: 29120138
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;5(8):1222-1224
pubmed: 31152668
Mol Cancer. 2022 Nov 2;21(1):208
pubmed: 36324128
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 8;111(1):157-65
pubmed: 24874480
Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(6):807-20
pubmed: 25894333
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 15;26(8):1915-1923
pubmed: 32139401
Gynecol Oncol. 1984 Jan;17(1):117-23
pubmed: 6693048
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 07;9:994467
pubmed: 36160147
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021 Feb;70(2):519-531
pubmed: 32852603
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;15(6):366-381
pubmed: 29651130
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:589301
pubmed: 26609529
J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan;123(1):517-25
pubmed: 23257362
Cancer. 1994 Jun 1;73(11):2680-6
pubmed: 8194005

Auteurs

Lilian van Wagensveld (L)

Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization.

Cedric Walker (C)

University of Bern.

Joyce Sanders (J)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Roy Kruitwagen (R)

Maastricht University Medical Centre.

Maaike van der Aa (M)

Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL).

Sven Rottenberg (S)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Koen Van de Vijver (K)

Ghent University Hospital.

Andrew Janowczyk (A)

Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology.

Hugo Horlings (H)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Classifications MeSH