Evaluation of patient satisfaction using the validated French version of the SSIPI questionnaire after inflatable penile implantation.

assessment erectile dysfunction outcomes penile prosthesis questionnaire satisfaction

Journal

The journal of sexual medicine
ISSN: 1743-6109
Titre abrégé: J Sex Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101230693

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 04 08 2023
revised: 21 10 2023
accepted: 23 10 2023
medline: 28 11 2023
pubmed: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Penile prothesis (PP) is a recommended treatment for erectile dysfunction that is refractory to less invasive treatments, but there are few validated tools to assess patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction after PP implantation using the French Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) questionnaire. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were collected from all consecutive patients who underwent PP implantation in our center between 2016 and 2021. The French SSIPI questionnaire was completed during a telephone call with each patient by an independent investigator. A good functional result was considered when the total SSIPI score was >48, corresponding to a score of >3 for each item. The median global SSIPI score for the cohort was 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73), and 53 (89.8%) patients were satisfied. The appearance of the penis with the PP was the item that had the lowest score for satisfaction (median score 23 [IQR, 19-26]), while the patients reported almost no pain (median score 10 [IQR, 9-10]). When patients with a total score of ≤64 were compared with those with a score of >64, PP size was significantly greater in the group with better functional results (P = .03). Assessment of patient satisfaction with a PP is important because this is the main criterion used to judge the success of surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with a PP using the French-validated version of SSIPI questionnaire. However, patients came from a single center and the population size was small. Almost 90% of patients with a PP were satisfied with the device when satisfaction was assessed using the SSIPI questionnaire.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Penile prothesis (PP) is a recommended treatment for erectile dysfunction that is refractory to less invasive treatments, but there are few validated tools to assess patient satisfaction.
AIM OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction after PP implantation using the French Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) questionnaire.
METHODS METHODS
Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were collected from all consecutive patients who underwent PP implantation in our center between 2016 and 2021. The French SSIPI questionnaire was completed during a telephone call with each patient by an independent investigator.
OUTCOMES RESULTS
A good functional result was considered when the total SSIPI score was >48, corresponding to a score of >3 for each item.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median global SSIPI score for the cohort was 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73), and 53 (89.8%) patients were satisfied. The appearance of the penis with the PP was the item that had the lowest score for satisfaction (median score 23 [IQR, 19-26]), while the patients reported almost no pain (median score 10 [IQR, 9-10]). When patients with a total score of ≤64 were compared with those with a score of >64, PP size was significantly greater in the group with better functional results (P = .03).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Assessment of patient satisfaction with a PP is important because this is the main criterion used to judge the success of surgery.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with a PP using the French-validated version of SSIPI questionnaire. However, patients came from a single center and the population size was small.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Almost 90% of patients with a PP were satisfied with the device when satisfaction was assessed using the SSIPI questionnaire.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38014798
pii: 7451798
doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad154
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society of Sexual Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Jeanne Beirnaert (J)

GRC 5 Prédictive Onco-Uro, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, F-75013 Paris, France.
Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1080 Brussels, Belgium.

Ugo Pinar (U)

GRC 5 Prédictive Onco-Uro, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, F-75013 Paris, France.

Davy Benarroche (D)

GRC 5 Prédictive Onco-Uro, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, F-75013 Paris, France.

William Akakpo (W)

Service d'Urologie, Clinique Ambroise Paré, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

Morgan Rouprêt (M)

GRC 5 Prédictive Onco-Uro, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, F-75013 Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH