Robotic and laparoscopic right lobe living donation compared to the open approach. a multicenter study on 1194 donor hepatectomies.


Journal

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 13 04 2023
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 28 11 2023
pubmed: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Due to the success of minimally invasive liver surgery, laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive donor hepatectomies (MIDH) are increasingly performed worldwide. We conducted a retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis on right lobe MIDH by comparing the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches to assess the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of MIDHs. From January 2016 until December 2020, 1194 donors underwent a right donor hepatectomy performed with a robotic (n=92), laparoscopic (n=306), and open approach (n=796) at six high-volume centers. Donor and recipients were matched for different variables using propensity score matching (1:1:2). Donor outcomes were recorded and postoperative pain was measured through a visual analog scale. Recipients' outcomes were also analyzed. Ninety-two donors undergoing robotic surgery were matched and compared to 92 and 184 donors undergoing laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. Conversions to open surgery occurred during 1 (1.1%) robotic and 2 (2.2%) laparoscopic procedures. Robotic procedures had a longer operative time (493±96 min) compared to laparoscopic and open procedures (347±120 and 358±95 min; p<0.001) but were associated with reduced donor blood losses (p<0.001). No differences were observed in overall and major complications (≥ IIIa). Robotic hepatectomy donors had significantly less pain compared to the two other groups (p<0.001). Fifty recipients of robotic-procured grafts were matched to 50 and 100 recipients of laparoscopic and open surgery procured grafts, respectively. No differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications and recipients' survival was similar (p=0.455). In very few high-volume centers, robotic right lobe procurement has shown to be a safe procedure. Despite an increased operative and the first warm ischemia times, this approach is associated with reduced intraoperative blood losses and pain compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches. Further data are needed to confirm it as a valuable option for the laparoscopic approach in MIDH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38015444
doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000304
pii: 01445473-990000000-00293
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Auteurs

Roberto Ivan Troisi (RI)

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.

Hwui-Dong Cho (HD)

Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Mariano Cesare Giglio (MC)

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.

Jinsoo Rhu (J)

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Jai Young Cho (JY)

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Kazuanri Sasaki (K)

Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease, and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, US.

Dai Hoon Han (DH)

Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

David Kwon (D)

Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease, and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, US.

Ho-Seong Han (HS)

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Po-Da Chen (PD)

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.

Yao-Ming Wu (YM)

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.

Gi Hong Choi (GH)

Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Gyu Sung Choi (GS)

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Ki-Hun Kim (KH)

Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Classifications MeSH