The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
01
02
2022
accepted:
07
11
2023
medline:
30
11
2023
pubmed:
28
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The widely used Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 (REI-40) assesses Rational and Experiential thinking styles. Recently, the authors have distinguished three aspects of the Experiential style: Intuition, Emotionality and Imagination and developed the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory (REIm). In this study, we examined the internal consistency, structural/factorial, discriminant and known-groups validity of both REI-40 and REIm, in two samples of Serbian students. Participants in Study 1 (N = 819, mean age M = 19.81, 31% males) completed REI-40 and HEXACO Personality Inventory (HEXACO-PI-R), while participants in Study 2 (N = 304, mean age M = 19.47, 29% males) completed REIm, HEXACO-PI-R and Disintegration inventory DELTA. The internal consistency of both REI version subscales was acceptable to good. The results of CFA analyses indicated an acceptable fit for REI-40, while the structural validity of REIm was poor. Both REI-40 subscales (Rationality and Experientiality), as well as REIm Intuition demonstrated only a small content overlap with basic personality traits, while REIm Experientiality, Emotionality and Imagination correlated highly with Openness and Emotionality. We also observed some gender differences in the expected direction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38015870
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294705
pii: PONE-D-22-02800
pmc: PMC10684000
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0294705Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Purić, Jokić. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):543-556
pubmed: 27411678
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Oct;49(5):439-46
pubmed: 18452500
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110771
pubmed: 33612906
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):972-87
pubmed: 10402681
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):120-139
pubmed: 30915177
Psychol Bull. 2016 Mar;142(3):260-90
pubmed: 26436538
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):140-158
pubmed: 30915178
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jan-Feb;101(1):25-31
pubmed: 28980831
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):905-19
pubmed: 17484612
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):150-66
pubmed: 18453460
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78
pubmed: 18154502
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
pubmed: 17835457
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):390-405
pubmed: 8765488
J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1043-79
pubmed: 21241307
Psychol Rep. 2016 Aug;119(1):242-62
pubmed: 27401067