Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 in Karnataka state, India.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
13
02
2023
accepted:
25
08
2023
medline:
30
11
2023
pubmed:
28
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Women's birthing experience is a sensitive indicator of the quality of childbirth care and can impact the physical and mental health of both women and their neonates. Negligible evidence exists on Indian women's birth experiences and-to the best of authors' knowledge-no questionnaire has been tested in India for measuring women's birthing experiences. This study aimed to test the construct validity and reliability of the Kannada-translated Revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. A cross-sectional survey was carried out among postnatal women (n = 251, up to six months postpartum, with a live healthy neonate) who had given birth at a public or private health facility using the Kannada-translated CEQ2 in two districts of Karnataka. Data were collected at participants' homes after seeking written informed consent. Model fit was determined by Confirmatory Factor Analyses. The 4-factor model of the CEQ2 showed good fit after deletion of one item (item 8, subcategory "participation") with CMIN = 1.33; SRMR = 0.04; GFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.037 and p value 0.002). The Cronbach alpha values were acceptable for the four subscales (0.92, 0.93, 0.97, 0.91) as well as for the overall 21-item scale (0.84). The Kannada-translated CEQ2 is a reliable tool to measure the childbirth experiences among Kannada-speaking women and can serve as a reliable ongoing evaluation of women's birth experiences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Women's birthing experience is a sensitive indicator of the quality of childbirth care and can impact the physical and mental health of both women and their neonates. Negligible evidence exists on Indian women's birth experiences and-to the best of authors' knowledge-no questionnaire has been tested in India for measuring women's birthing experiences. This study aimed to test the construct validity and reliability of the Kannada-translated Revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.
METHODOLOGY
METHODS
A cross-sectional survey was carried out among postnatal women (n = 251, up to six months postpartum, with a live healthy neonate) who had given birth at a public or private health facility using the Kannada-translated CEQ2 in two districts of Karnataka. Data were collected at participants' homes after seeking written informed consent. Model fit was determined by Confirmatory Factor Analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The 4-factor model of the CEQ2 showed good fit after deletion of one item (item 8, subcategory "participation") with CMIN = 1.33; SRMR = 0.04; GFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.037 and p value 0.002). The Cronbach alpha values were acceptable for the four subscales (0.92, 0.93, 0.97, 0.91) as well as for the overall 21-item scale (0.84).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Kannada-translated CEQ2 is a reliable tool to measure the childbirth experiences among Kannada-speaking women and can serve as a reliable ongoing evaluation of women's birth experiences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38015907
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291591
pii: PONE-D-23-04234
pmc: PMC10684018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0291591Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Jha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Midwifery. 2021 Dec;103:103141
pubmed: 34560375
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1386932
pubmed: 29087240
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199
pubmed: 32252679
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104
pubmed: 15804318
BMJ Open. 2014 May 22;4(5):e004401
pubmed: 24852297
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):226-32
pubmed: 15495491
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Nov 13;13(1):534
pubmed: 33187541
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Oct;17(5):411-21
pubmed: 24663684
Midwifery. 2012 Apr;28(2):265-74
pubmed: 21489665
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 18;15:97
pubmed: 25928085
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jun;19(2):84-97
pubmed: 9638601
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134
pubmed: 35180852
Midwifery. 2016 Aug;39:78-86
pubmed: 27321724
Aust Occup Ther J. 2016 Apr;63(2):130-3
pubmed: 26450767
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81
pubmed: 21143961
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Dec;71(Suppl 2):84-89
pubmed: 34924719
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1552-1561
pubmed: 34427637
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;24(4):296-300
pubmed: 31333745
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 03;5:100097
pubmed: 32021972
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 03;14:622
pubmed: 25465053
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Jan;88(1):34-7
pubmed: 12495957
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):126
pubmed: 35168552
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan 21;10:20503121211068249
pubmed: 35083043
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0230992
pubmed: 32722725
Midwifery. 2016 May;36:70-9
pubmed: 27106946
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215373
pubmed: 31017927
Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):99-111
pubmed: 30115515
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014 Dec;5(4):199-204
pubmed: 25433832
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 20;15(1):51
pubmed: 29559000
Infant Behav Dev. 2018 May;51:24-32
pubmed: 29544195
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 24;14:45
pubmed: 24456544
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 21;15:182
pubmed: 26294064
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;19(13):
pubmed: 35805298