The potential benefits of long-acting injectable cabotegravir in pregnant and breastfeeding women and their infants: a modelling study.


Journal

AIDS (London, England)
ISSN: 1473-5571
Titre abrégé: AIDS
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8710219

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Nov 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 28 11 2023
medline: 28 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBW) in sub-Saharan Africa have high HIV incidence rates and associated risk of vertical transmission to their infants. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and injectable PrEP (long-acting cabotegravir, or CAB-LA) can potentially reduce this HIV transmission, but population-level impacts are uncertain. We extended a previously-developed model of HIV and PrEP in South Africa to allow for variable PrEP duration and preference in PBW. We considered three potential scenarios for PrEP provision to PBW: oral PrEP only, CAB-LA only and allowing oral/CAB-LA choice, with uptake and retention assumptions informed by South African data, each compared to a 'base' scenario without PrEP for PBW. Without PrEP for PBW, the model estimates 1.31 million new infections will occur between 2025 and 2035 in South African adults and children, including 100,000 in PBW, 16,800 in infants at/before birth, and 35,200 in children through breastmilk. In the oral PrEP only scenario, these numbers would reduce by 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7-1.7%), 8.6% (4.8-12.9%), 4.0% (2.1-5.8%) and 5.3% (3.0-8.2%) respectively. In the CAB-LA only scenario, the corresponding reductions would be 6.1% (2.9-9.6%), 41.2% (19.8-65.0%), 12.6% (6.0-19.4%) and 29.5% (13.9-46.8%) respectively, and in the oral/CAB-LA choice scenario, similar reductions would be achieved (5.6% [3.4-8.0%], 39.0% [23.4-55.9%], 12.4% [7.4-16.8%] and 27.6% [16.5-39.9%] respectively). CAB-LA has the potential to be substantially more effective than oral PrEP in preventing HIV acquisition in PBW and vertical transmission, and can also modestly reduce HIV incidence at a population level.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBW) in sub-Saharan Africa have high HIV incidence rates and associated risk of vertical transmission to their infants. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and injectable PrEP (long-acting cabotegravir, or CAB-LA) can potentially reduce this HIV transmission, but population-level impacts are uncertain.
METHODS METHODS
We extended a previously-developed model of HIV and PrEP in South Africa to allow for variable PrEP duration and preference in PBW. We considered three potential scenarios for PrEP provision to PBW: oral PrEP only, CAB-LA only and allowing oral/CAB-LA choice, with uptake and retention assumptions informed by South African data, each compared to a 'base' scenario without PrEP for PBW.
RESULTS RESULTS
Without PrEP for PBW, the model estimates 1.31 million new infections will occur between 2025 and 2035 in South African adults and children, including 100,000 in PBW, 16,800 in infants at/before birth, and 35,200 in children through breastmilk. In the oral PrEP only scenario, these numbers would reduce by 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7-1.7%), 8.6% (4.8-12.9%), 4.0% (2.1-5.8%) and 5.3% (3.0-8.2%) respectively. In the CAB-LA only scenario, the corresponding reductions would be 6.1% (2.9-9.6%), 41.2% (19.8-65.0%), 12.6% (6.0-19.4%) and 29.5% (13.9-46.8%) respectively, and in the oral/CAB-LA choice scenario, similar reductions would be achieved (5.6% [3.4-8.0%], 39.0% [23.4-55.9%], 12.4% [7.4-16.8%] and 27.6% [16.5-39.9%] respectively).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
CAB-LA has the potential to be substantially more effective than oral PrEP in preventing HIV acquisition in PBW and vertical transmission, and can also modestly reduce HIV incidence at a population level.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38016171
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003803
pii: 00002030-990000000-00404
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Auteurs

Leigh F Johnson (LF)

Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Landon Myer (L)

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Lise Jamieson (L)

Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
The South African Department of Science and Innovation/National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Gesine Meyer-Rath (G)

Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
The South African Department of Science and Innovation/National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Department of Global Health, Boston University, Boston, USA.

Sinead Delany-Moretlwe (S)

Wits RHI, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Dvora Joseph Davey (DJ)

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

Classifications MeSH