Prospective, Randomized Study of Fibrinogen Concentrate Versus Cryoprecipitate for Correcting Hypofibrinogenemia in Cardiac Surgery Patients.


Journal

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
ISSN: 1532-8422
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110208

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 16 06 2023
revised: 18 10 2023
accepted: 23 10 2023
medline: 29 11 2023
pubmed: 29 11 2023
entrez: 28 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with hypofibrinogenemia and severe bleeding requiring transfusion. Guidelines recommend cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the treatment of acquired hypofibrinogenemia. This study compared cryoprecipitate and FC for the correction of acquired hypofibrinogenemia and the associated costs. A single-center, prospective, randomized study evaluating patients with hypofibrinogenemia after cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was direct treatment cost. Secondary endpoints included the change in fibrinogen level after FC and/or cryoprecipitate dosing. A single-center study in Astana, Kazakhstan. Participants who underwent CPB from 2021 to 2022 and developed clinically significant bleeding and hypofibrinogenemia. Patients were randomized to receive cryoprecipitate or FC. Eighty-eight adult patients with acquired hypofibrinogenemia (<2.0 g/L) after CPB were randomized to receive cryoprecipitate (N = 40) or FC (N = 48), with similar demographics between groups. Overall, mean ± SD 9.33 ± 0.94 units (range, 8-10) cryoprecipitate or 1.40 ± 0.49 g (1-2) FC was administered to the 2 groups. From before administration to 24 hours after, mean plasma fibrinogen increased by a mean ± SD of 125 ± 65 and 96 ± 65 mg/dL in the cryoprecipitate and FC groups, respectively. At 48 hours after administration, there was no significant difference in fibrinogen levels between groups. The mean direct cost of treatment with FC was significantly lower than with cryoprecipitate (p < 0.0001): $1,505.06 ± $152.40 and $631.75 ± $223.67 per patient for cryoprecipitate and FC, respectively. Analysis of plasma fibrinogen concentration showed that cryoprecipitate and FC had comparable effectiveness. However, FC is advantageous over cryoprecipitate due to its ease of handling, lower cost, and high purity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38016817
pii: S1053-0770(23)00894-7
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.10.031
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Dauren Ayaganov (D)

NJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.

Aidyn Kuanyshbek (A)

NJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.

Ivan Vakhrushev (I)

NJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.

Tatyana Li (T)

NJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan. Electronic address: leeanestrean@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH