Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Nov 2023
28 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
19
07
2023
accepted:
16
11
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
29
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Different applications or industries use different systems for linear actuation, such as hydraulic, pneumatic or electric. Electric systems are becoming increasingly popular and are already replacing hydraulic systems in various applications. These are known to be potentially harmful to the environment, as large amounts of fluid can be released into the environment in the event of a pipe burst or other accident. This paper presents the results of a comparison between hydraulic, pneumatic and electric systems under variable conditions but with similar loads in all three systems. The common feature of all three systems is the input power, which was limited to 1.1 kW. There was no hydraulic accumulator in the hydraulic system and no pressure vessel in the pneumatic system, so no stored energy could influence the system behaviour or results. The main difference between the systems studied was the profile of displacement and power consumption. The most consistent response and lowest power consumption were obtained with the electric system, although both hydraulic and pneumatic systems can achieve consistent response with some modifications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38016978
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47602-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-47602-x
pmc: PMC10684514
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20938Subventions
Organisme : Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
ID : P2-0231
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 15;14(6):
pubmed: 33804082
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 03;22(11):
pubmed: 35684894
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 13;12(1):9807
pubmed: 35697715
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):60
pubmed: 36593305