Effectiveness of aerobic exercise in the prevention and treatment of postpartum depression: Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
19
02
2023
accepted:
05
10
2023
medline:
1
12
2023
pubmed:
29
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aerobic exercise is widely recognized for improving mental health and reducing negative emotions, including anxiety. However, research on its role in preventing and treating postpartum depression (PPD) has yielded inconsistent results. Some studies show positive effects on PPD symptoms, while others find limited impact, suggesting various factors at play, such as exercise type, intensity, and individual differences. To address this gap, our study aims to comprehensively gather evidence on the preventive and therapeutic effects of aerobic exercise for PPD. We'll focus on differences in exercise program design and implementation, exploring how these factors impact intervention outcomes. By identifying effective exercise approaches, we aim to provide more comprehensive exercise prescription recommendations for this vulnerable population. We conducted a quantitative systematic review of the study in 5 representative databases for the effect of aerobic exercise on PPD. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed with Review-Manager.5.4 and Stata.16.0 software, respectively. This study has been registered on the official Prospero website, and the registration code is CRD42023398221. Twenty-six studies with 2,867 participants were eventually included and the efficacy of aerobic exercise in preventing and treating postpartum depression is significant compared to standard care. (MD = -1.90; 95%CL: -2.58 to -1.21; I2 = 86%). Subgroup analysis suggests that the intervention objective (prevention vs. treatment) of exercise could potentially be a source of heterogeneity in this study, as the "Test for subgroup difference" revealed the presence of significant distinctions (p = 0.02<0.05). The "Test for subgroup difference" yielded non-significant results for both the supervised vs. unsupervised subgroup comparison (p = 0.55 > 0.05) and the individual vs. team subgroup comparison (p = 0.78 > 0.05). Nonetheless, when assessing their effect sizes [Subtotal (95%CL)], the supervised exercise group [-1.66 (-2.48, -0.85)] exhibited a slightly better performance than the unsupervised exercise group [-1.37 (-1.86, -0.88)], while the team exercise group [-1.43 (-1.94, -0.93)] slightly outperformed the individual exercise group [-1.28 (-2.23, -0.33)]. Network meta-analysis indicated that moderate intensity (35~45 min) group demonstrated a more pronounced intervention effect compared to low intensity (50~60 min) group [-2.63 (-4.05, -1.21)] and high intensity (20~30 min) group [-2.96 (-4.51, -1.41)], while the 3~4 times/week group had a more significant intervention effect compared to 1~2 times/week groups [-2.91 (-3.99, -1.83)] and 5~6 times/week groups [-3.28 (-4.75, -1.81)]. No significant differences were observed in pairwise comparisons of intervention effects among the five common types of aerobic exercises. (95%CL including 0). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) results align with the findings mentioned above and will not be reiterated here. The efficacy of aerobic exercise in preventing and treating postpartum depression is significant compared to standard care, with a greater emphasis on prevention. The optimal prescribed exercise volume for intervention comprises a frequency of 3~4 exercise sessions per week, moderate intensity (35~45 minutes). Currently, several uncharted internal factors influence the optimal intervention effect of aerobic exercise, such as the potential enhancement brought by team-based and supervised exercise. Given the absence of significant differences in certain results and the limitations of the study, it is essential to exercise caution when interpreting the outcomes. Further research is needed in the future to provide a more comprehensive understanding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Aerobic exercise is widely recognized for improving mental health and reducing negative emotions, including anxiety. However, research on its role in preventing and treating postpartum depression (PPD) has yielded inconsistent results. Some studies show positive effects on PPD symptoms, while others find limited impact, suggesting various factors at play, such as exercise type, intensity, and individual differences. To address this gap, our study aims to comprehensively gather evidence on the preventive and therapeutic effects of aerobic exercise for PPD. We'll focus on differences in exercise program design and implementation, exploring how these factors impact intervention outcomes. By identifying effective exercise approaches, we aim to provide more comprehensive exercise prescription recommendations for this vulnerable population.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a quantitative systematic review of the study in 5 representative databases for the effect of aerobic exercise on PPD. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed with Review-Manager.5.4 and Stata.16.0 software, respectively. This study has been registered on the official Prospero website, and the registration code is CRD42023398221.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies with 2,867 participants were eventually included and the efficacy of aerobic exercise in preventing and treating postpartum depression is significant compared to standard care. (MD = -1.90; 95%CL: -2.58 to -1.21; I2 = 86%). Subgroup analysis suggests that the intervention objective (prevention vs. treatment) of exercise could potentially be a source of heterogeneity in this study, as the "Test for subgroup difference" revealed the presence of significant distinctions (p = 0.02<0.05). The "Test for subgroup difference" yielded non-significant results for both the supervised vs. unsupervised subgroup comparison (p = 0.55 > 0.05) and the individual vs. team subgroup comparison (p = 0.78 > 0.05). Nonetheless, when assessing their effect sizes [Subtotal (95%CL)], the supervised exercise group [-1.66 (-2.48, -0.85)] exhibited a slightly better performance than the unsupervised exercise group [-1.37 (-1.86, -0.88)], while the team exercise group [-1.43 (-1.94, -0.93)] slightly outperformed the individual exercise group [-1.28 (-2.23, -0.33)]. Network meta-analysis indicated that moderate intensity (35~45 min) group demonstrated a more pronounced intervention effect compared to low intensity (50~60 min) group [-2.63 (-4.05, -1.21)] and high intensity (20~30 min) group [-2.96 (-4.51, -1.41)], while the 3~4 times/week group had a more significant intervention effect compared to 1~2 times/week groups [-2.91 (-3.99, -1.83)] and 5~6 times/week groups [-3.28 (-4.75, -1.81)]. No significant differences were observed in pairwise comparisons of intervention effects among the five common types of aerobic exercises. (95%CL including 0). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) results align with the findings mentioned above and will not be reiterated here.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of aerobic exercise in preventing and treating postpartum depression is significant compared to standard care, with a greater emphasis on prevention. The optimal prescribed exercise volume for intervention comprises a frequency of 3~4 exercise sessions per week, moderate intensity (35~45 minutes). Currently, several uncharted internal factors influence the optimal intervention effect of aerobic exercise, such as the potential enhancement brought by team-based and supervised exercise. Given the absence of significant differences in certain results and the limitations of the study, it is essential to exercise caution when interpreting the outcomes. Further research is needed in the future to provide a more comprehensive understanding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38019729
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287650
pii: PONE-D-23-04024
pmc: PMC10686497
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0287650Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Jan;140:110295
pubmed: 33227552
JACC CardioOncol. 2022 Oct 18;4(4):491-503
pubmed: 36444224
Phys Ther. 2010 Mar;90(3):348-55
pubmed: 20056720
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e028252
pubmed: 31753866
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:214-23
pubmed: 25285751
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Feb;36(2):220-7
pubmed: 20692101
Front Physiol. 2021 Jun 28;12:640024
pubmed: 34262468
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):112-121
pubmed: 29490560
Body Image. 2020 Dec;35:41-52
pubmed: 32892146
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1997 Dec;37(4):287-91
pubmed: 9509828
J Hepatol. 2015 Jul;63(1):174-82
pubmed: 25863524
Health Care Women Int. 2017 Jun;38(6):635-639
pubmed: 28278021
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1292-1302
pubmed: 31095086
PEC Innov. 2022 Sep 29;1:100088
pubmed: 37213720
Birth. 2008 Mar;35(1):60-5
pubmed: 18307489
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186861
pubmed: 30646198
Int J Nurs Pract. 2004 Aug;10(4):177-94
pubmed: 15265228
Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):343-51
pubmed: 21683171
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2015 May;21(2):94-100
pubmed: 25886805
Int J Nurs Pract. 2015 Oct;21(5):478-85
pubmed: 24620734
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 15;321:304-319
pubmed: 36374719
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020 Oct;56(4):844-850
pubmed: 32187390
J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 1;298(Pt A):26-42
pubmed: 34728280
Prev Med. 2022 Sep;162:107142
pubmed: 35803356
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec;102(12):2283-2290
pubmed: 34283997
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Apr;18(2):190-9
pubmed: 24725785
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019 Feb;22(1):37-53
pubmed: 29882074
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jul;70:15-23
pubmed: 29747048
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:540-550
pubmed: 34979183
Psychol Med. 2015 Aug;45(11):2413-25
pubmed: 25804297
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Mar;48(3):101034
pubmed: 34718034
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 19;14:971
pubmed: 25233867
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:1-7
pubmed: 28950158
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;54(7):597-606
pubmed: 9236543
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Mar;58(548):178-83
pubmed: 18399022
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Jan;16(1):139-48
pubmed: 21153759
Birth. 2017 Sep;44(3):200-208
pubmed: 28589648
Midwifery. 2021 Feb;93:102898
pubmed: 33290891
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Sep;30(3):191-200
pubmed: 19728220
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jan;12(1):30-6
pubmed: 24732977