Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord oscillations are the cardinal pathophysiological change in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

degenerative cervical myelopathy phase contrast MRI spinal cord motion spinal cord oscillations spinal stenosis

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 09 05 2023
accepted: 16 10 2023
medline: 29 11 2023
pubmed: 29 11 2023
entrez: 29 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of non-traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury, but its pathophysiology is poorly understood. As spinal cord compression observed in standard MRI often fails to explain a patient's status, new diagnostic techniques to assess DCM are one of the research priorities. Minor cardiac-related cranio-caudal oscillations of the cervical spinal cord are observed by phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) in healthy controls (HCs), while they become pathologically increased in patients suffering from degenerative cervical myelopathy. Whether transversal oscillations (i.e., anterior-posterior and right-left) also change in DCM patients is not known. We assessed spinal cord motion simultaneously in all three spatial directions (i.e., cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior, and right-left) using sagittal PC-MRI and compared physiological oscillations in 18 HCs to pathological changes in 72 DCM patients with spinal canal stenosis. The parameter of interest was the amplitude of the velocity signal (i.e., maximum positive to maximum negative peak) during the cardiac cycle. Most patients suffered from mild DCM (mJOA score 16 (14-18) points), and the majority (68.1%) presented with multisegmental stenosis. The spinal canal was considerably constricted in DCM patients in all segments compared to HCs. Under physiological conditions in HCs, the cervical spinal cord oscillates in the cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions, while right-left motion was marginal [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: cranio-caudal: 0.40 (0.27-0.48) cm/s; anterior-posterior: 0.18 (0.16-0.29) cm/s; right-left: 0.10 (0.08-0.13) cm/s]. Compared to HCs, DCM patients presented with considerably increased cranio-caudal oscillations due to the cardinal pathophysiologic change in non-stenotic [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: 0.79 (0.49-1.32) cm/s] and stenotic segments [.g., segment C5 amplitudes: 0.99 (0.69-1.42) cm/s]). In contrast, right-left [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: non-stenotic segment: 0.20 (0.13-0.32) cm/s; stenotic segment: 0.11 (0.09-0.18) cm/s] and anterior-posterior oscillations [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: non-stenotic segment: 0.26 (0.15-0.45) cm/s; stenotic segment: 0.11 (0.09-0.18) cm/s] remained on low magnitudes comparable to HCs. Increased cranio-caudal oscillations of the cervical cord are the cardinal pathophysiologic change and can be quantified using PC-MRI in DCM patients. This study addresses spinal cord oscillations as a relevant biomarker reflecting dynamic mechanical cord stress in DCM patients, potentially contributing to a loss of function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38020663
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1217526
pmc: PMC10663304
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1217526

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Pfender, Rosner, Zipser, Friedl, Schubert, Sutter, Klarhoefer, Spirig, Betz, Freund, Farshad, Curt and Hupp.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

MK was employed by the Siemens Healthineers AG. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):151-8
pubmed: 10669242
Radiology. 1992 Dec;185(3):653-60
pubmed: 1438741
Global Spine J. 2022 Feb;12(1_suppl):130S-146S
pubmed: 34797993
Acta Radiol. 1997 Sep;38(5):803-9
pubmed: 9332234
Brain. 2011 May;134(Pt 5):1259-61
pubmed: 21596766
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 15;39(26):2136-42
pubmed: 25271503
Neurology. 2023 Feb 14;100(7):e651-e660
pubmed: 36357188
J Neurosurg. 1978 Jun;48(6):975-9
pubmed: 660249
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1990-1991;16(1):3-7; discussion 7
pubmed: 2133407
J Neurosurg. 1984 Apr;60(4):707-11
pubmed: 6707739
Sci Rep. 2019 May 15;9(1):7415
pubmed: 31092891
Radiology. 1994 Jul;192(1):117-21
pubmed: 8208922
Spinal Cord. 2021 Nov;59(11):1216-1218
pubmed: 34628477
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018 Jan;29(1):13-19
pubmed: 29173425
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2344-54
pubmed: 24462810
Br J Neurosurg. 2001 Feb;15(1):17-21
pubmed: 11303655
Radiology. 1988 Dec;169(3):773-8
pubmed: 3186999
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jul;58(1):185-189
pubmed: 17659610
J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1521-31
pubmed: 16394936
Neuroradiology. 1994;36(2):125-9
pubmed: 8183451
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 25;10(17):
pubmed: 34501236
J Neuroimaging. 2022 Nov;32(6):1121-1133
pubmed: 35962464
Spinal Cord. 1996 Jul;34(7):422-6
pubmed: 8963998
Neuroradiology. 1992;35(1):1-9
pubmed: 1289731
Neuroscientist. 2013 Aug;19(4):409-21
pubmed: 23204243
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Mar;42(3):597-609
pubmed: 33541903
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Feb;20(2):98-106
pubmed: 33357512
Neurology. 1995 Sep;45(9):1746-53
pubmed: 7675239
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 1;38(1):4-10
pubmed: 22673181
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1 Supp1 1):S35-41
pubmed: 17204884
Ultrasound Q. 2020 Dec 9;38(1):49-52
pubmed: 33298792
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Aug;15(7):1299-308
pubmed: 7976942
Brain. 1972;95(1):87-100
pubmed: 5023093
Neuroradiology. 1992;34(5):370-80
pubmed: 1407513
Brain Spine. 2023 Apr 13;3:101743
pubmed: 37383476
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 2:132-8
pubmed: 24626958
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22(3):115-9
pubmed: 7786803
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 02;10(4):e0123022
pubmed: 25837285
Neurosurgery. 2020 Nov 16;87(6):1157-1166
pubmed: 32497210
Spinal Cord. 2018 Aug;56(8):769-776
pubmed: 29497178
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 May 21;35(1):18-24
pubmed: 34020423
Invest Radiol. 1998 Mar;33(3):141-5
pubmed: 9525752
Neurobiol Dis. 2013 Jun;54:43-58
pubmed: 23466695
Acta Radiol. 2000 Nov;41(6):578-83
pubmed: 11092479
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102580
pubmed: 33578322

Auteurs

Nikolai Pfender (N)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Jan Rosner (J)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

Carl M Zipser (CM)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Susanne Friedl (S)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Martin Schubert (M)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Reto Sutter (R)

Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Markus Klarhoefer (M)

Siemens Healthineers AG, Zurich, Switzerland.

José M Spirig (JM)

University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Michael Betz (M)

University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Patrick Freund (P)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Mazda Farshad (M)

University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Armin Curt (A)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Markus Hupp (M)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH