Current state of preoperative embolization for spinal metastasis - A survey by the EANS spine section.
Angiography
Blood loss
Complications
Metastasis
Preoperative embolization
Spine tumor
Journal
Brain & spine
ISSN: 2772-5294
Titre abrégé: Brain Spine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918470888906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
10
2023
accepted:
07
11
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
29
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preoperative embolization (PE) for spinal metastasis can be used to reduce tumor blood supply in selected patients. The decision whether and when to perform PE varies largely among spine surgeons and centers. The aim was to understand the current decision-making process in European spine centers. The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) spine section designed a 13-item online survey. It was distributed to neurosurgical residents and board-certified neurosurgeons between 7th of February and May 5, 2023. We analyzed 120 survey responses. Most participants were board-certified neurosurgeons (71%) or residents (26%) in university hospitals (76%). Routinely performed PE was stated not a common practice in 62%. Of those using PE, 25% indicated to perform it in selected cases requiring vertebral body replacement. Reasons for not performing PE included lack of time (44%), unclear benefits (25%), no significant bleeding without PE (19%), and significant bleeding despite PE (8%). Most participants opted for PE < 24h before surgery, but in a separate anesthesia (54%). More experienced participants were more likely to observe reduced blood loss (BL) after PE (p = 0.014). The most common reported complications were neurological deterioration due to spinal cord infarction (n = 15) and swelling due to tumor necrosis (n = 13). PE is still not a routine among European spine surgeons and is considered mostly for elective cases with hypervascularized tumors scheduled in a separate anesthesia <24h before tumor resection. Most participants noted reduced intraoperative BL, but also a risk of procedure-related complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38021014
doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102712
pii: S2772-5294(23)01000-7
pmc: PMC10668085
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102712Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Orthopedics. 2012 Sep;35(9):e1389-95
pubmed: 22955407
Eur Spine J. 2021 Oct;30(10):2839-2851
pubmed: 34415449
J Neurosurg. 2003 Mar;98(2 Suppl):156-64
pubmed: 12650400
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22):1964-9
pubmed: 23917645
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1334-1344
pubmed: 35263662
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Dec;42(4):951-959
pubmed: 29971580
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Nov;150(11):1177-81; discussion 1181
pubmed: 18958386
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:362-71
pubmed: 26704206
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):402-12.e1
pubmed: 25636672
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2638-2646
pubmed: 36449062
Eur Spine J. 2005 Apr;14(3):263-8
pubmed: 15378414
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 15;33(24):2651-61; discussion 2662
pubmed: 18981957
Neurointervention. 2021 Mar;16(1):52-58
pubmed: 33657312
Eur Spine J. 2016 Dec;25(12):3962-3970
pubmed: 26968873
World Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;143:374-388
pubmed: 32805465
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jul;41(3):861-867
pubmed: 29189958
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023 Jul;66(4):438-445
pubmed: 37315576
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e745-e757
pubmed: 34153484
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Jan;62(1):106-113
pubmed: 30630297
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Aug;18(8):449-53
pubmed: 20675637