A Review of Bacterial Colonization on Dental Implants With Various Hygiene Instruments.
bacterial colonization
biofilm formation
dental implant
hygiene instruments
peri-implant diseases
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
accepted:
21
10
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
29
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Peri-implant diseases can still develop despite oral hygiene practices being maintained. Consequently, regular debridement must be carried out to ensure the implant is sustained. This review evaluated bacterial colonization on implants following the use of different hygiene instruments. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases for articles published from 2012 to 2022. A total of 19 full-text papers were selected. The number of bacteria colonized was most commonly evaluated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or by colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, crystal violet assays, plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, turbidity test, and live-dead assays. Rubber cup polishing with an abrasive paste showed a significantly greater reduction in biofilm formation compared with air abrasion with glycine powder, while the air abrasion treatment was found to be more efficient than piezoelectric, carbon, and stainless steel scalers. Surface treatment with Er, Cr: YSGG laser, and Er: YAG laser resulted in statistically significant superior dental biofilm removal compared with titanium curettes and photodynamic therapy. Air abrasion, plastic curette, titanium curette, and ultrasonic scaler showed no significant differences in bacterial colonization, but air abrasion and plastic curette were safer for zirconia implant decontamination. Furthermore, the titanium brush showed better results in decontaminating the implant surface than the Er: YAG laser. Although no single instrument or method could be considered as offering a gold standard in treating peri-implant diseases, the use of air abrasion with glycine powder, laser therapies, rubber cup polishing with an abrasive paste, and a titanium brush had high levels of cleaning efficacy and acceptance by patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38021779
doi: 10.7759/cureus.47483
pmc: PMC10663103
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e47483Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Chen et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Materials (Basel). 2018 Dec 06;11(12):
pubmed: 30563297
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Dec 27;48(6):373-382
pubmed: 30619638
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):419-28
pubmed: 24552131
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Jul 09;2014:908534
pubmed: 27437506
Am J Dent. 2017 Aug;30(4):190-196
pubmed: 29178700
Biofouling. 2013;29(4):369-79
pubmed: 23574038
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Aug;82(8):643-650
pubmed: 31305347
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):483-490
pubmed: 27000771
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:791725
pubmed: 26436097
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Sep;9(5):516-21
pubmed: 23559913
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;12(13):
pubmed: 31252629
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 Nov 2;14(4):401-416
pubmed: 34726849
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Oct;75(7):542-549
pubmed: 28715944
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):313-321
pubmed: 34599862
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Apr 12;11(4):1580-678
pubmed: 20480036
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):1013-1021
pubmed: 27392811
Cureus. 2022 Oct 30;14(10):e30884
pubmed: 36465763
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):238-250
pubmed: 35943293
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1192-200
pubmed: 22925048
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Dec;43(6):429-436
pubmed: 28972812
Quintessence Int. 2019;50(9):722-730
pubmed: 31286118
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1921-1930
pubmed: 30232627
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0171086
pubmed: 28125700