A Comparison Between Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) Microscopy and Culture for the Detection of Post-COVID-19 Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis.

diagnostic accuracy fungal culture koh microscopy mucorales post covid rocm

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
accepted: 26 10 2023
medline: 29 11 2023
pubmed: 29 11 2023
entrez: 29 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background and objective Mucormycosis is an emerging and serious angioinvasive infection caused by filamentous fungi related to the order of Mucorales and the class of Mucormycetes. There was a marked increase in the number of cases of mucormycosis in India following the second wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the year 2021. In this study, we aimed to compare potassium hydroxide (KOH) microscopy with culture for the detection of post-COVID-19 rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM). Materials and methods The KOH microscopy was performed with a 10% or 20% KOH-mounted slide with specimens collected from suspected cases of post-COVID-19 ROCM. Simultaneously, the culture was done on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA). These were incubated at 37 ℃ and 25 ℃ for 28 days. Diagnostic parameters were calculated by comparing KOH with gold standard culture. Results KOH mount was positive for broad aseptate fungal hyphae in 322 (54.1%) cases, while it was negative in 244 (41.0%) cases. KOH mount was positive for other fungi in 29 (4.8%) samples. The diagnostic accuracy of the KOH mount for Mucorales was 70.3%. KOH mount had a sensitivity of 84.9%, specificity of 61.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 56.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.2%. Conclusions Based on our findings, the KOH microscopy positivity rate was higher in tissue samples compared to nasal swabs, with a sensitivity of 84.9%, specificity of 61.5%, PPV of 56.9%, and NPV of 87.2%. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the KOH mount for Mucorales was 70.3%.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38022015
doi: 10.7759/cureus.47707
pmc: PMC10674886
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e47707

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Hasan et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jul 18;12:937481
pubmed: 35923801
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Nov 1;:1-9
pubmed: 36337300
Surv Ophthalmol. 1994 Jul-Aug;39(1):3-22
pubmed: 7974189
Cureus. 2021 Nov 10;13(11):e19455
pubmed: 34926028
Future Microbiol. 2014;9(5):683-95
pubmed: 24957094
Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 04;9(3):
pubmed: 33806386
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 20;13:895989
pubmed: 35794908
Med Mycol. 2018 Apr 1;56(suppl_1):93-101
pubmed: 29538730
Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:764843
pubmed: 20672004
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;54 Suppl 1:S55-60
pubmed: 22247446
Medicine (Baltimore). 1986 Mar;65(2):113-23
pubmed: 3951358

Auteurs

Saqib Hasan (S)

Microbiology, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, IND.

Prashant Gupta (P)

Microbiology, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, IND.

Diksha Shukla (D)

Microbiology, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, IND.

Gopa Banerjee (G)

Microbiology, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, IND.

Classifications MeSH