Music production and its role in coalition signaling during foraging contexts in a hunter-gatherer society.

coalition signaling foraging hunter-gatherer less familiar music predation

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 07 05 2023
accepted: 06 09 2023
medline: 29 11 2023
pubmed: 29 11 2023
entrez: 29 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Music is a cultural activity universally present in all human societies. Several hypotheses have been formulated to understand the possible origins of music and the reasons for its emergence. Here, we test two hypotheses: (1) the coalition signaling hypothesis which posits that music could have emerged as a tool to signal cooperative intent and signal strength of alliances and (2) music as a strategy to deter potential predators. In addition, we further explore the link between tactile cues and the propensity of mothers to sing toward infants. For this, we investigated the singing behaviors of hunter-gatherer mothers during daily foraging trips among the Mbendjele BaYaka in the Republic of the Congo. Although singing is a significant component of their daily activities, such as when walking in the forest or collecting food sources, studies on human music production in hunter-gatherer societies are mostly conducted during their ritual ceremonies. In this study, we collected foraging and singing behavioral data of mothers by using focal follows of five BaYaka women during their foraging trips in the forest. In accordance with our predictions for the coalition signaling hypothesis, women were more likely to sing when present in large groups, especially when group members were less familiar. However, predictions of the predation deterrence hypothesis were not supported as the interaction between group size and distance from the village did not have a significant effect on the likelihood of singing. The latter may be due to limited variation in predation risk in the foraging areas, because of the intense bush meat trade, and hence, future studies should include foraging areas with higher densities of wild animals. Lastly, we found that mothers were more likely to sing when they were carrying infants compared to when infants were close, but carried by others, supporting the prediction that touch plays an important prerequisite role in musical interaction between the mother and child. Our study provides important insight into the role of music as a tool in displaying the intent between or within groups to strengthen potentially conflict-free alliances during joint foraging activities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38022909
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218394
pmc: PMC10646562
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1218394

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Chittar, Jang, Samuni, Lewis, Honing, Loon and Janmaat.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Dev Psychol. 1998 Jul;34(4):653-61
pubmed: 9681257
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jan 05;14:613378
pubmed: 33584178
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Jan;65(1):47-55
pubmed: 21297852
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140096
pubmed: 25646519
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 10;285(1888):
pubmed: 30305438
Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):133-41
pubmed: 21054526
Am J Primatol. 2022 Jul;84(7):e23382
pubmed: 35383993
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Apr;153(4):513-25
pubmed: 24452414
Curr Biol. 2013 May 6;23(9):739-45
pubmed: 23602481
Curr Biol. 2010 Aug 10;20(15):1359-61
pubmed: 20598541
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;6(11):1545-1556
pubmed: 35851843
Infant Behav Dev. 2020 Nov;61:101494
pubmed: 32966905
Science. 2019 Nov 22;366(6468):
pubmed: 31753969
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Oct;142(4):2464
pubmed: 29092547
Front Psychol. 2014 May 08;5:392
pubmed: 24847296
Behav Ecol. 2009 Mar;20(2):416-420
pubmed: 19461866
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1837-46
pubmed: 22641822
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 18;111(46):16343-8
pubmed: 25349399
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e108
pubmed: 34588042
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1286-9
pubmed: 21393537
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013 Mar 1;67(3):373-381
pubmed: 23459197
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;930:43-61
pubmed: 11458859
Birth. 2010 Sep;37(3):192-201
pubmed: 20887535
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 21;112(29):8987-92
pubmed: 26124105
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e78
pubmed: 34588038
Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Aug;27(4):491-503; discussion 503-83
pubmed: 15773427
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):21-51
pubmed: 26189987
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20190934
pubmed: 31337316
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 30;9(1):11066
pubmed: 31363113
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e121
pubmed: 34588076
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;289(1987):20221407
pubmed: 36382518
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316
pubmed: 20668659
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e85
pubmed: 34588015
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 31;9(1):11080
pubmed: 31367002
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0137806
pubmed: 26381883
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;930:1-16
pubmed: 11458822
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e117
pubmed: 34588056
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e122
pubmed: 34588071
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1587-93
pubmed: 12656393
Hum Nat. 2022 Sep;33(3):261-279
pubmed: 35986877
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;44:e68
pubmed: 34588025
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov/Dec;26(6):518-533
pubmed: 27867282
Hum Nat. 2011 Sep;22(3):281-302
pubmed: 22388877
Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1347-51
pubmed: 17823344
Ann Hum Biol. 2014 Jul-Aug;41(4):368-80
pubmed: 24932750
Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):380-91
pubmed: 22285934
Attach Hum Dev. 2002 Apr;4(1):3-24
pubmed: 12065027
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):49-53
pubmed: 21668129
Evol Hum Behav. 2016 Mar 1;37(2):152-158
pubmed: 27158219

Auteurs

Chirag Rajendra Chittar (CR)

Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Haneul Jang (H)

Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Liran Samuni (L)

Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Cooperative Evolution Lab, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.

Jerome Lewis (J)

Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Henkjan Honing (H)

Music Cognition Group, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

E Emiel van Loon (EE)

Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Karline R L Janmaat (KRL)

Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
ARTIS Amsterdam Royal Zoo, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH