A multi-centric evaluation of self-learning GAN based pseudo-CT generation software for low field pelvic magnetic resonance imaging.
MRI
artificial intelligence
cycle GAN
pelvis
pseudo-CT
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
23
06
2023
accepted:
26
10
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
29
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An artificial intelligence-based pseudo-CT from low-field MR images is proposed and clinically evaluated to unlock the full potential of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy for pelvic cancer care. In collaboration with TheraPanacea (TheraPanacea, Paris, France) a pseudo-CT AI-model was generated using end-to-end ensembled self-supervised GANs endowed with cycle consistency using data from 350 pairs of weakly aligned data of pelvis planning CTs and TrueFisp-(0.35T)MRIs. The image accuracy of the generated pCT were evaluated using a retrospective cohort involving 20 test cases coming from eight different institutions (US: 2, EU: 5, AS: 1) and different CT vendors. Reconstruction performance was assessed using the organs at risk used for treatment. Concerning the dosimetric evaluation, twenty-nine prostate cancer patients treated on the low field MR-Linac (ViewRay) at Montpellier Cancer Institute were selected. Planning CTs were non-rigidly registered to the MRIs for each patient. Treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT with a clinical TPS fulfilling all clinical criteria and recalculated on the warped CT (wCT) and the pCT. Three different algorithms were used: AAA, AcurosXB and MonteCarlo. Dose distributions were compared using the global gamma passing rates and dose metrics. The observed average scaled (between maximum and minimum HU values of the CT) difference between the pCT and the planning CT was 33.20 with significant discrepancies across organs. Femoral heads were the most reliably reconstructed (4.51 and 4.77) while anal canal and rectum were the less precise ones (63.08 and 53.13). Mean gamma passing rates for 1%1mm, 2%/2mm, and 3%/3mm tolerance criteria and 10% threshold were greater than 96%, 99% and 99%, respectively, regardless the algorithm used. Dose metrics analysis showed a good agreement between the pCT and the wCT. The mean relative difference were within 1% for the target volumes (CTV and PTV) and 2% for the OARs. This study demonstrated the feasibility of generating clinically acceptable an artificial intelligence-based pseudo CT for low field MR in pelvis with consistent image accuracy and dosimetric results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38023165
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1245054
pmc: PMC10667706
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1245054Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Prunaretty, Güngör, Gevaert, Azria, Valdenaire, Balermpas, Boldrini, Chuong, De Ridder, Hardy, Kandiban, Maingon, Mittauer, Ozyar, Roque, Colombo, Paragios, Pennell, Placidi, Shreshtha, Speiser, Tanadini-Lang, Valentini and Fenoglietto.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
NP: Chief Executive Officer; Therapanacea. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Sep 10;63(18):185001
pubmed: 30109989
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Nov 1;105(3):479-492
pubmed: 31271829
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;14(8):
pubmed: 35454850
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1057-1060
pubmed: 30012525
Phys Med. 2018 Sep;53:80-85
pubmed: 30241758
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):28
pubmed: 28126030
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 08;18:98-101
pubmed: 31341983
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Jul;184:109692
pubmed: 37150446
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 09;9:16
pubmed: 24405515
Phys Med. 2021 Sep;89:265-281
pubmed: 34474325
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 23;12:969463
pubmed: 36212472
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb;64(1):163-177
pubmed: 31646742
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):151-9
pubmed: 24931085
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:205-212
pubmed: 33075394
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jun;22(6):191-197
pubmed: 34042268
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3788-3798
pubmed: 31220353
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Mar;24(3):e13838
pubmed: 36347050
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;15(7):
pubmed: 37046741
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):97-9
pubmed: 22234506
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Oct 02;7:58-64
pubmed: 33458406
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jan 1;100(1):199-217
pubmed: 29254773
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Aug;22(8):93-104
pubmed: 34184390
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Apr 21;62(8):2961-2975
pubmed: 27983520