National trends in technique use for esophagectomy: Does primary surgeon specialty matter?


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
revised: 04 10 2023
accepted: 24 10 2023
medline: 30 11 2023
pubmed: 30 11 2023
entrez: 29 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons (including surgical oncologists) perform most esophagectomies. The purpose of this study was to explore whether specialty-driven differences in surgical techniques and the use of minimally invasive surgical approaches exist and are associated with postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy. This was a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophagectomy-targeted participant user file (2016-2018). Patients who underwent esophagectomy were sorted into cardiothoracic and general surgeon cohorts based on surgeon specialty. Perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using the χ Of 3,247 patients included, 1,792 (55.2%) underwent esophagectomy by cardiothoracic surgeons and 1,455 (44.5%) by general surgeons as the primary surgeon. Cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely to use traditional minimally invasive surgical (P = .0004) or open approaches (P < .0001) and less likely to use robotic (P = .04) or a hybrid robotic and traditional approaches (P < .0001). Cardiothoracic surgeons performed more Ivor Lewis esophagectomies and fewer transhiatal and McKeown esophagectomies (P < .0001). After risk adjustment, there were no differences in rates of postesophagectomy complications, such as anastomotic leaks or positive margins, between cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons (all P > .05). However, cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely than general surgeons to treat anastomotic leaks with surgery rather than procedural interventions (odds ratio = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.52). Cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons use minimally invasive surgical subtypes differently when performing esophagectomy. However, there were no risk-adjusted differences in postoperative complications when compared by surgical subspecialty. Esophagectomy is being performed safely by surgeons with different specialties and training pathways.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons (including surgical oncologists) perform most esophagectomies. The purpose of this study was to explore whether specialty-driven differences in surgical techniques and the use of minimally invasive surgical approaches exist and are associated with postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy.
METHODS METHODS
This was a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophagectomy-targeted participant user file (2016-2018). Patients who underwent esophagectomy were sorted into cardiothoracic and general surgeon cohorts based on surgeon specialty. Perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using the χ
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 3,247 patients included, 1,792 (55.2%) underwent esophagectomy by cardiothoracic surgeons and 1,455 (44.5%) by general surgeons as the primary surgeon. Cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely to use traditional minimally invasive surgical (P = .0004) or open approaches (P < .0001) and less likely to use robotic (P = .04) or a hybrid robotic and traditional approaches (P < .0001). Cardiothoracic surgeons performed more Ivor Lewis esophagectomies and fewer transhiatal and McKeown esophagectomies (P < .0001). After risk adjustment, there were no differences in rates of postesophagectomy complications, such as anastomotic leaks or positive margins, between cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons (all P > .05). However, cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely than general surgeons to treat anastomotic leaks with surgery rather than procedural interventions (odds ratio = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.52).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons use minimally invasive surgical subtypes differently when performing esophagectomy. However, there were no risk-adjusted differences in postoperative complications when compared by surgical subspecialty. Esophagectomy is being performed safely by surgeons with different specialties and training pathways.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38030524
pii: S0039-6060(23)00802-4
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Adam R Dyas (AR)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: adam.dyas@cuanschutz.edu.

Benedetto Mungo (B)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Michael R Bronsert (MR)

Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Christina M Stuart (CM)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Alison H Mungo (AH)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

John D Mitchell (JD)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Simran K Randhawa (SK)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Elizabeth David (E)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Camille L Stewart (CL)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Martin D McCarter (MD)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Robert A Meguid (RA)

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Classifications MeSH