The association between of placenta previa and congenital abnormalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Congenital Abnormalities
Meta-analysis
Placenta previa
Systematic review
Journal
BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Nov 2023
30 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
15
10
2023
accepted:
18
11
2023
medline:
1
12
2023
pubmed:
30
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Congenital abnormalities, as one of the fetal complications of placenta previa, may cause health problems or disability of the child throughout life. This study aimed to determine the relationship between placenta previa and congenital abnormalities. Potential articles were retrieved from three electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Sciences) up to 21 May 2023 without limit of time and language. A random effect model was applied for meta-analysis. The heterogeneity was calculated based on I In the initial search, 829 articles were retrieved. Finally, according to the inclusion criteria, eight studies were analyzed in the meta-analysis. A significant association was reported between placenta previa and risk of congenital abnormalities based on crude form (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.28) and adjusted studies (OR = 6.38, 95% CI = 1.47 to 11.30). The high heterogeneity was observed among the studies reported based on adjusted and crude form, respectively (I Our study provides evidence that there is a positive and significant association between placenta previa and congenital malformations, including all structural anomalies, chromosomal defects, and congenital hypothyroidisms. Therefore, monitoring congenital abnormalities in the fetus of a mother with placenta previa is necessary.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Congenital abnormalities, as one of the fetal complications of placenta previa, may cause health problems or disability of the child throughout life. This study aimed to determine the relationship between placenta previa and congenital abnormalities.
METHODS
METHODS
Potential articles were retrieved from three electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Sciences) up to 21 May 2023 without limit of time and language. A random effect model was applied for meta-analysis. The heterogeneity was calculated based on I
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the initial search, 829 articles were retrieved. Finally, according to the inclusion criteria, eight studies were analyzed in the meta-analysis. A significant association was reported between placenta previa and risk of congenital abnormalities based on crude form (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.28) and adjusted studies (OR = 6.38, 95% CI = 1.47 to 11.30). The high heterogeneity was observed among the studies reported based on adjusted and crude form, respectively (I
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study provides evidence that there is a positive and significant association between placenta previa and congenital malformations, including all structural anomalies, chromosomal defects, and congenital hypothyroidisms. Therefore, monitoring congenital abnormalities in the fetus of a mother with placenta previa is necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38031046
doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04433-z
pii: 10.1186/s12887-023-04433-z
pmc: PMC10687781
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
606Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2151-61
pubmed: 22579125
Placenta. 2009 Jul;30(7):613-8
pubmed: 19447490
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 May;93(2):110-7
pubmed: 16563394
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015 Jun;103(6):527-35
pubmed: 25808834
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jul 15;882:163613
pubmed: 37087019
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Jun;18(6):712-24
pubmed: 23551357
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):927-41
pubmed: 16582134
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1045-9
pubmed: 16157109
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160
pubmed: 33781993
Circ Res. 1966 Sep;19(3):544-51
pubmed: 5925152
Isr J Med Sci. 1980 Jun;16(6):429-32
pubmed: 7399874
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Placenta. 2022 Jan;117:21-27
pubmed: 34768164
Fetal Ther. 1989;4(2-3):138-40
pubmed: 2486886
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973 Apr;80(4):311-5
pubmed: 4704676
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;93(4):541-4
pubmed: 10214830
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000 Jun;79(6):502-7
pubmed: 10857876
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1305-9
pubmed: 12748503
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
pubmed: 7786990
J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Dec;10(6):414-9
pubmed: 11798453
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128
pubmed: 23245604
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;284(1):47-51
pubmed: 20652281
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):654-668
pubmed: 26244528
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 16;102(24):e34052
pubmed: 37327290
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):345-352
pubmed: 30318981
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2055-8
pubmed: 23245598
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Mar;13(3):175-90
pubmed: 12820840
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Sep 15;132(2):180-91
pubmed: 686107
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Feb;31(2):126-31
pubmed: 19327211
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
J Perinat Med. 2010 May;38(3):275-9
pubmed: 20146660
J Pregnancy. 2020 Jan 06;2020:5630296
pubmed: 32395343