Intraoperative Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Assess Vessel Flow in Neurosurgery: A Pilot Study.


Journal

Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 29 08 2023
accepted: 04 10 2023
medline: 30 11 2023
pubmed: 30 11 2023
entrez: 30 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) has emerged as a promising tool for assessment of vessel flow during neurosurgery. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of visualizing vessel flow in the macrocirculation with a new fully microscope-integrated LSCI system and assess the validity and objectivity of findings compared with fluorescence angiography (FA). This is a single-center prospective observational study enrolling adult patients requiring microsurgical treatment for brain vascular pathologies or brain tumors. Three independent raters, blinded toward findings of FA, reviewed regions of interest (ROIs) placed in exposed vessels and target structures. The primary end point was the validity of LSCI for assessment of vessel flow as measured by the agreement with FA. The secondary end point was objectivity, measured as the inter-rater agreement of LSCI findings. During 18 surgical procedures, 23 observations using FA and LSCI were captured simultaneously. Using LSCI, vessel flow was assessable in 62 (86.1%) and not assessable in 10 (13.9%) ROIs. The agreement between LSCI and FA was 86.1%, with an agreement coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.94). Disagreement between LSCI and FA was observed in the 10 ROIs that were not assessable. The agreement between ROIs that were assessable using LSCI and FA was 100%. The inter-rater agreement of LSCI findings was 87.9%, with an agreement coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.94). Fully microscope-integrated LSCI is feasible and has a high potential for clinical utility. Because of its characteristics, LSCI can be viewed as a full-field visual micro-Doppler that can be used as a complementary method to FA for assessing vessel flow during neurosurgery. Despite technical limitations related to the early development phase of the fully microscope-integrated system, we demonstrated reasonable validity and objectivity of findings compared with FA. Further research and refinement of the system may enhance its value in neurosurgical applications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) has emerged as a promising tool for assessment of vessel flow during neurosurgery. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of visualizing vessel flow in the macrocirculation with a new fully microscope-integrated LSCI system and assess the validity and objectivity of findings compared with fluorescence angiography (FA).
METHODS METHODS
This is a single-center prospective observational study enrolling adult patients requiring microsurgical treatment for brain vascular pathologies or brain tumors. Three independent raters, blinded toward findings of FA, reviewed regions of interest (ROIs) placed in exposed vessels and target structures. The primary end point was the validity of LSCI for assessment of vessel flow as measured by the agreement with FA. The secondary end point was objectivity, measured as the inter-rater agreement of LSCI findings.
RESULTS RESULTS
During 18 surgical procedures, 23 observations using FA and LSCI were captured simultaneously. Using LSCI, vessel flow was assessable in 62 (86.1%) and not assessable in 10 (13.9%) ROIs. The agreement between LSCI and FA was 86.1%, with an agreement coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.94). Disagreement between LSCI and FA was observed in the 10 ROIs that were not assessable. The agreement between ROIs that were assessable using LSCI and FA was 100%. The inter-rater agreement of LSCI findings was 87.9%, with an agreement coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.94).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Fully microscope-integrated LSCI is feasible and has a high potential for clinical utility. Because of its characteristics, LSCI can be viewed as a full-field visual micro-Doppler that can be used as a complementary method to FA for assessing vessel flow during neurosurgery. Despite technical limitations related to the early development phase of the fully microscope-integrated system, we demonstrated reasonable validity and objectivity of findings compared with FA. Further research and refinement of the system may enhance its value in neurosurgical applications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38032222
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002776
pii: 00006123-990000000-00974
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Carl Zeiss Meditec AG

Informations de copyright

Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.

Références

Richards LM, Towle EL, Fox DJ Jr, Dunn AK. Intraoperative laser speckle contrast imaging with retrospective motion correction for quantitative assessment of cerebral blood flow. Neurophotonics. 2014;1(1):015006.
Richards LM, Kazmi SS, Olin KE, Waldron JS, Fox DJ Jr, Dunn AK. Intraoperative multi-exposure speckle imaging of cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37(9):3097-3109.
Hecht N, Müller MM, Sandow N, Pinczolits A, Vajkoczy P, Woitzik J. Infarct prediction by intraoperative laser speckle imaging in patients with malignant hemispheric stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(6):1022-1032.
Hecht N, Schrammel M, Neumann K, et al. Perfusion-dependent cerebral autoregulation impairment in hemispheric stroke. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(2):358-368.
Hecht N, Woitzik J, Dreier JP, Vajkoczy P. Intraoperative monitoring of cerebral blood flow by laser speckle contrast analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(4):E11.
Hecht N, Woitzik J, König S, Horn P, Vajkoczy P. Laser speckle imaging allows real-time intraoperative blood flow assessment during neurosurgical procedures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(7):1000-1007.
Klijn E, Hulscher HC, Balvers RK, et al. Laser speckle imaging identification of increases in cortical microcirculatory blood flow induced by motor activity during awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(2):280-286.
Nomura S, Inoue T, Ishihara H, et al. Reliability of laser speckle flow imaging for intraoperative monitoring of cerebral blood flow during cerebrovascular surgery: comparison with cerebral blood flow measurement by single photon emission computed tomography. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6):e753-e757.
Parthasarathy AB, Weber EL, Richards LM, Fox DJ, Dunn AK. Laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow in humans during neurosurgery: a pilot clinical study. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15(6):066030.
Woitzik J, Hecht N, Pinczolits A, et al. Propagation of cortical spreading depolarization in the human cortex after malignant stroke. Neurology. 2013;80(12):1095-1102.
Woitzik J, Pinczolits A, Hecht N, et al. Excitotoxicity and metabolic changes in association with infarct progression. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1183-1185.
Miller DR, Ashour R, Sullender CT, Dunn AK. Continuous blood flow visualization with laser speckle contrast imaging during neurovascular surgery. Neurophotonics. 2022;9(2):021908.
Raabe A, Nakaji P, Beck J, et al. Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(6):982-989.
Zhao X, Belykh E, Cavallo C, et al. Application of fluorescein fluorescence in vascular neurosurgery. Front Surg. 2019;6:52.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-808.
Institute ANS. American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. Laser Institute of America; 2007.
Gwet KL. Testing the difference of correlated agreement coefficients for statistical significance. Educ Psychol Meas. 2016;76(4):609-637.
Klein D. Implementing a general framework for assessing interrater agreement in Stata. Stata J. 2018;18(4):871-901.

Auteurs

Johannes Goldberg (J)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

David R Miller (DR)

Dynamic Light Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.

Alexis Dimanche (A)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Cédric Kissling (C)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Timothy Müller (T)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Mandy D Müller (MD)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Christopher Marvin Jesse (CM)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Michael Murek (M)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

David Bervini (D)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Andrew K Dunn (AK)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Andreas Raabe (A)

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Research Center Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH