Behavioral examination of the role of the primary visual cortex in the perceived size representation.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 14 07 2023
accepted: 28 11 2023
medline: 4 12 2023
pubmed: 1 12 2023
entrez: 30 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous research has shown that neural activity in the primary visual cortex (V1) and V1 surface area may be linked with subjective experience of size illusions. Here, we behaviorally measured the hallway illusion with experimental manipulations as a proxy of V1's influence on size perception. We first tested whether the hallway illusion can persist without further recurrent processing by using backward masking. Next, we examined relations among the hallway illusion magnitude and other perceptual measures that have been suggested to be correlated with V1 surface area. In Experiment 1, the magnitude of the hallway illusion was not affected by the stimulus duration and visual masking when the hallway context was previewed (i.e., complex depth information is already processed). It suggests that V1 activity could support the size illusion to some extent even when recurrent processing between V1 and higher areas is disturbed. In Experiment 2, the hallway illusion magnitude was correlated with the Vernier acuity threshold, but not with physical size discriminability. Our results provide converging evidence with the previous findings in that neural activity in V1 may contribute to size illusions and that V1 surface area is not the sole factor that mediates size perception and visual precision.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38036762
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48632-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-48632-1
pmc: PMC10689741
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

21134

Subventions

Organisme : National Research Foundation of Korea
ID : 2022R1I1A2067731

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Brain Cogn. 2012 Nov;80(2):201-13
pubmed: 22902306
Neuron. 2015 Feb 4;85(3):641-56
pubmed: 25619658
Science. 1969 Nov 28;166(3909):1174-6
pubmed: 17775578
J Neurosci. 2020 May 27;40(22):4410-4417
pubmed: 32350038
Cereb Cortex. 1997 Mar;7(2):181-92
pubmed: 9087826
Curr Biol. 2014 Jul 21;24(14):1653-1658
pubmed: 25017208
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Nov;223(3):367-75
pubmed: 23108368
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;12(4):231-42
pubmed: 21407245
Neuroscience. 2023 Mar 15;514:79-91
pubmed: 36736613
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3535-41
pubmed: 26314755
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 01;10(7):e0129377
pubmed: 26132106
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jul;20(7):1586-95
pubmed: 19875676
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Mar 11;15(4):540-2
pubmed: 22406550
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Feb;5(2):101-2
pubmed: 11788836
Psychol Res. 1999;62(2-3):81-92
pubmed: 10472196
Curr Biol. 2020 Sep 21;30(18):3680-3686.e5
pubmed: 32735814
Percept Psychophys. 1978 Mar;23(3):231-6
pubmed: 662574
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):273-85
pubmed: 25772166
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 26;35(34):12033-46
pubmed: 26311782
Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
pubmed: 7754376
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13604-12
pubmed: 21940451
Science. 1998 Jul 24;281(5376):552-5
pubmed: 9677196
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15999-6008
pubmed: 24089504
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 8;29(13):2237-2243.e4
pubmed: 31257140
BMC Neurosci. 2011 Mar 11;12:27
pubmed: 21396093
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;85(3):1309-14
pubmed: 11247999
Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20
pubmed: 6844102
Multisens Res. 2015;28(3-4):285-96
pubmed: 26288900
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2201
pubmed: 23887643
Neuron. 2003 May 22;38(4):659-71
pubmed: 12765616
Brain Res. 2011 May 4;1388:109-22
pubmed: 21329676
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60550
pubmed: 23536915
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Brain Cogn. 2020 Nov;145:105625
pubmed: 32932108
J Vis. 2018 Mar 1;18(3):16
pubmed: 29677332
Science. 1992 Aug 28;257(5074):1279-81
pubmed: 1519066
Science. 2002 Oct 11;298(5592):409-12
pubmed: 12376700
Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 11;18(21):1707-12
pubmed: 18993076
Neuron. 1998 Dec;21(6):1409-22
pubmed: 9883733
J Vis. 2019 Jun 3;19(6):8
pubmed: 31185096
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):429-34
pubmed: 16462737
Cereb Cortex. 2023 May 9;33(10):6345-6353
pubmed: 36562991
Neuroreport. 2009 May 27;20(8):809-14
pubmed: 19384256
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 30;7:12110
pubmed: 27357864
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jan;14(1):28-30
pubmed: 21131954
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:259-267
pubmed: 30096483
Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):366-83
pubmed: 17964252

Auteurs

Sang-Ah Yoo (SA)

Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Sung Jun Joo (SJ)

Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea. sungjun@pusan.ac.kr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH