Judgments of learning in bilinguals: Does studying in a L2 hinder learning monitoring?


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 14 11 2022
accepted: 17 05 2023
medline: 4 12 2023
pubmed: 1 12 2023
entrez: 1 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Nowadays, use of a second language (L2) has taken a central role in daily activities. There are numerous contexts in which people have to process information, acquire new knowledge, or make decisions via a second language. For example, in academia and higher education, English is commonly used as the language of instruction and communication even though English might not be students' native or first language (L1) and they might not be proficient in it. Such students may face different challenges when studying and learning in L2 relative to contexts in which they study and learn in their L1, and this may affect their metamemory strategies. However, little is yet known about whether metamemory processes undergo significant changes when learning is carried out in L2. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible consequences on learning derived from studying materials in L2 and, more specifically, to explore whether the interplay between monitoring and control (metamemory processes) changes as a function of the language involved. In three experiments, we explored whether font type (Experiment 1), concreteness (Experiment 2), and relatedness (Experiment 3) affected judgments of learning (JOLs) and memory performance in both L1 and L2. JOLs are considered the result of metacognitive strategies involved in the monitoring of learning and have been reported to vary with the difficulty of the material. The results of this study showed that people were able to monitor their learning in both L1 and L2, even though they judged L2 learning as more difficult than L1. Interestingly, self-perceived difficulty did not hinder learning, and people recognized L2 materials as well or better than L1 materials. We suggest that this might be an example of a desirable difficulty for memory.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38039293
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286516
pii: PONE-D-22-31354
pmc: PMC10691729
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0286516

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Reyes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):229-41
pubmed: 22976883
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):174-9
pubmed: 18605499
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Feb;61(2):292-323
pubmed: 17853203
J Gerontol. 1981 Nov;36(6):707-14
pubmed: 7299087
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):973-8
pubmed: 21626231
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11
pubmed: 24142837
J Neurolinguistics. 2010 Nov 1;23(6):564-579
pubmed: 21057658
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013 Aug;25(5):515-530
pubmed: 25077013
Psychol Bull. 1984 Jan;95(1):109-33
pubmed: 6544431
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1236-42
pubmed: 21574750
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(7):1376-96
pubmed: 22524495
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1217-1224
pubmed: 27815819
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Aug;47(8):1103-1112
pubmed: 34516216
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2356-2364
pubmed: 29611141
Brain Res. 2017 Jun 15;1665:50-64
pubmed: 28372943
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jun;73(6):891-907
pubmed: 32065046
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):836-847
pubmed: 31259565
Memory. 2014;22(8):1060-9
pubmed: 24303779
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jun 19;:
pubmed: 29917244
Memory. 2020 Apr;28(4):537-552
pubmed: 32216583
Metacogn Learn. 2021;16(3):749-768
pubmed: 34867119
Memory. 2002 May;10(3):161-77
pubmed: 11958721
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):496-503
pubmed: 22086650
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(10):1257-1272
pubmed: 28626775
Annu Rev Linguist. 2015;1:377-394
pubmed: 28642932
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):935-41
pubmed: 22638985
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):902-10
pubmed: 25159692
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1022-1047
pubmed: 31580119
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1180-91
pubmed: 11550746
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Nov;137(4):615-25
pubmed: 18999356
Psychol Res. 2004 Dec;69(1-2):138-46
pubmed: 14722769
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):940-67
pubmed: 17675598
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;16(4):240-50
pubmed: 22464592
Psychol Aging. 2006 Dec;21(4):790-803
pubmed: 17201498
Memory. 2006 Feb;14(2):253-61
pubmed: 16484114
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23474
pubmed: 34873258
Conscious Cogn. 2000 Jun;9(2 Pt 1):288-307
pubmed: 10924249
Memory. 2021 Apr;29(4):444-455
pubmed: 33783316
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1296-303
pubmed: 23606134
Memory. 2016;24(3):409-22
pubmed: 25730660
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 28;8:422
pubmed: 28503157
Memory. 2000 Nov;8(6):377-92
pubmed: 11145069
Cognition. 2011 Jan;118(1):111-5
pubmed: 21040910
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun 1;18(3):159-163
pubmed: 19750138
J Mem Lang. 2012 Jul;67(1):
pubmed: 24222718
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 02;9(9):e106468
pubmed: 25180974
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407
pubmed: 31016684
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1781-92
pubmed: 23647380
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):665-71
pubmed: 16629300
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014 Jun 1;23(3):159-163
pubmed: 25309055
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Nov 13;2:2398212818810591
pubmed: 30542659
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0216779
pubmed: 31141531
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jan;29(1):22-34
pubmed: 12549580
Psychol Bull. 1985 Jul;98(1):185-99
pubmed: 4034817
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):979-993
pubmed: 29725876
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):233-262
pubmed: 28230411
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Neuropsychol Rev. 2005 Sep;15(3):105-30
pubmed: 16328731
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Feb;37(1):65-70
pubmed: 16097345
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30009
pubmed: 22242196
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):743-9
pubmed: 22585362
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):1-11
pubmed: 24001021
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1407-1425
pubmed: 33140376
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jan;52:102-16
pubmed: 24144955
Mem Cognit. 2017 May;45(4):639-650
pubmed: 27987115
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):378-84
pubmed: 23188739
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1477-1508
pubmed: 31916838
Mem Cognit. 2015 May;43(4):647-58
pubmed: 25388520
Exp Aging Res. 2001 Jan-Mar;27(1):41-65
pubmed: 11205529
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):507-519
pubmed: 29327336
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:27-38
pubmed: 29689481

Auteurs

Marta Reyes (M)

Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Mª Julia Morales (MJ)

Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.

Mª Teresa Bajo (MT)

Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH