Alternative routes of surfactant application - An update.


Journal

Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
ISSN: 1878-0946
Titre abrégé: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101240003

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 2 12 2023
medline: 2 12 2023
entrez: 1 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Non-invasive modes of respiratory support have been shown to be the preferable way of primary respiratory support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation can be beneficial for preterm infants in reduction of morbidity and even mortality. However, it is well-established that some infants managed with non-invasive respiratory support from the outset have symptomatic RDS to a degree that warrants surfactant administration. Infants for whom non-invasive respiratory support ultimately fails are prone to adverse outcomes, occurring at a frequency on par with the group intubated primarily. This raises the question how to combine non-invasive respiratory support with surfactant therapy. Several methods of less or minimally invasive surfactant therapy have been developed to address the dilemma between avoidance of mechanical ventilation and administration of surfactant. This paper describes the different methods of less invasive surfactant application, reports the existing evidence from clinical studies, discusses the limitations of each of the methods and the open and future research questions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38040586
pii: S1744-165X(23)00072-0
doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101496
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101496

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statements AK received support for attending meetings from Chiesi Farmaceutici and served as a consultant on advisory boards established by Chiesi. KR is paid consultant for ONY Biotech for device development. DT has no conflict. COD has no conflict of interest to declare. Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italia, manufacturers of poractant alfa (Curosurf), the investigational medicinal product studied in the POPART trial, provided the oropharyngeal surfactant free of charge for the study. They had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or the decisions to present or publish the results. PD received support for attending meetings from Chiesi Farmaceutici; served as a consultant on advisory boards established by Chiesi and AbbVie; holds (without royalty claims) a design patent for a catheter for surfactant instillation. Received support for the OPTIMIST-A trial from Chiesi (provision of surfactant at reduced cost). The OPTIMIST-A trial funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study.

Auteurs

Angela Kribs (A)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: angela.kribs@uk-koeln.de.

Kari D Roberts (KD)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Daniele Trevisanuto (D)

Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Colm O' Donnell (C)

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: codonnell@nmh.ie.

Peter A Dargaville (PA)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.

Classifications MeSH